Literature DB >> 19345097

Audiovisual integration of speech in a bistable illusion.

K G Munhall1, M W ten Hove, M Brammer, M Paré.   

Abstract

Visible speech enhances the intelligibility of auditory speech when listening conditions are poor [1], and can modify the perception of otherwise perfectly audible utterances [2]. This audiovisual perception is our most natural form of communication and one of our most common multisensory phenomena. However, where and in what form the visual and auditory representations interact is still not completely understood. Although there are longstanding proposals that multisensory integration occurs relatively late in the speech-processing sequence [3], considerable neurophysiological evidence suggests that audiovisual interactions can occur in the brain stem and primary sensory cortices [4, 5]. A difficulty testing such hypotheses is that when the degree of integration is manipulated experimentally, the visual and/or auditory stimulus conditions are drastically modified [6, 7]; thus, the perceptual processing within a modality and the corresponding processing loads are affected [8]. Here, we used a bistable speech stimulus to examine the conditions under which there is a visual influence on auditory perception in speech. The results indicate that visual influences on auditory speech processing, at least for the McGurk illusion, necessitate the conscious perception of the visual speech gestures, thus supporting the hypothesis that multisensory speech integration is not completed in early processing stages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19345097      PMCID: PMC2692869          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.03.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  32 in total

1.  Effect of binocular rivalry suppression on the motion aftereffect.

Authors:  S W Lehmkuhle; R Fox
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Precise recording of human eye movements.

Authors:  H Collewijn; F van der Mark; T C Jansen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  A METHOD OF MEASURING EYE MOVEMENT USING A SCLERAL SEARCH COIL IN A MAGNETIC FIELD.

Authors:  D A ROBINSON
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1963-10       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Do you see what I am saying? Exploring visual enhancement of speech comprehension in noisy environments.

Authors:  Lars A Ross; Dave Saint-Amour; Victoria M Leavitt; Daniel C Javitt; John J Foxe
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Independent binocular rivalry processes for motion and form.

Authors:  David Alais; Amanda Parker
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Apparent motion can survive binocular rivalry suppression.

Authors:  H Wiesenfelder; R Blake
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Audiovisual gating and the time course of speech perception.

Authors:  K G Munhall; Y Tohkura
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Parieto-occipital approximately 10 Hz activity reflects anticipatory state of visual attention mechanisms.

Authors:  J J Foxe; G V Simpson; S P Ahlfors
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  Binocular rivalry and motion perception.

Authors:  R Blake; K Yu; M Lokey; H Norman
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial orienting.

Authors:  C Spence; J Driver
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-01
View more
  14 in total

1.  Auditory and tactile signals combine to influence vision during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Claudia Lunghi; Maria Concetta Morrone; David Alais
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Multisensory constraints on awareness.

Authors:  Ophelia Deroy; Yi-Chuan Chen; Charles Spence
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Interacting parallel pathways associate sounds with visual identity in auditory cortices.

Authors:  Jyrki Ahveninen; Samantha Huang; Seppo P Ahlfors; Matti Hämäläinen; Stephanie Rossi; Mikko Sams; Iiro P Jääskeläinen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Multistability in perception: binding sensory modalities, an overview.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Schwartz; Nicolas Grimault; Jean-Michel Hupé; Brian C J Moore; Daniel Pressnitzer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  The Complex Interplay Between Multisensory Integration and Perceptual Awareness.

Authors:  O Deroy; N Faivre; C Lunghi; C Spence; M Aller; U Noppeney
Journal:  Multisens Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.286

6.  Speech misperception: speaking and seeing interfere differently with hearing.

Authors:  Takemi Mochida; Toshitaka Kimura; Sadao Hiroya; Norimichi Kitagawa; Hiroaki Gomi; Tadahisa Kondo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Naturalistic stimulus structure determines the integration of audiovisual looming signals in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Verena Conrad; Mario Kleiner; Andreas Bartels; Jessica Hartcher O'Brien; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Uta Noppeney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Hearing (rivaling) lips and seeing voices: how audiovisual interactions modulate perceptual stabilization in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Manuel Vidal; Victor Barrès
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Touch interacts with vision during binocular rivalry with a tight orientation tuning.

Authors:  Claudia Lunghi; David Alais
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Do audio-visual motion cues promote segregation of auditory streams?

Authors:  Lidia Shestopalova; Tamás M Bőhm; Alexandra Bendixen; Andreas G Andreou; Julius Georgiou; Guillaume Garreau; Botond Hajdu; Susan L Denham; István Winkler
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.