Literature DB >> 9523490

How should we evaluate health status? A comparison of three methods in patients presenting with obstructive sleep apnoea.

C Jenkinson1, J Stradling, S Petersen.   

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to compare three approaches to the measurement of patient-reported health status which produce summary scales of health status: the Patient-generated Index (PGI) is a measure of individual quality of life (QoL), the EuroQol is a measure of QoL the results of which are weighted by utility values gained from community surveys and the SF-36 which produces two summary scales of health status (the physical component summary (PCS) and the mental component summary (MCS) scores). A follow-up interview survey of patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) was conducted. The patients received continuous positive airways pressure therapy (CPAP) between the two administrations of the questionnaires. One hundred patients presenting with OSA and who were suitable for CPAP therapy were asked if they would take part in the study. The results on the PGI, EuroQol EQ-5D utility weighted scores and 'thermometer' scores and SF-36 physical and mental summary scores were measured. Eighty-nine respondents provided sufficient data to calculate PGI and EuroQol scores and 86 patients provided sufficient data to calculate SF-36 summary scores. The PGI indicated substantial improvement after CPAP treatment whereas the EuroQol indicated little or no improvement on either utility weighted or thermometer scores. The SF-36 PCS and MCS scores were lower than those of the general population at baseline, but had improved to the normative levels after treatment. The EuroQol provided a substantially different picture of change to either of the ones gained from the SF-36 or PGI. It is suggested that the EuroQol does not contain questions which relate to important aspects of health and well-being and may not accurately reflect the health state of individuals. Consequently, caution must be exercised to assure that an appropriate instrument has been employed when using health outcomes data to assess or prioritize available health care treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9523490     DOI: 10.1023/a:1008845123907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  16 in total

1.  Is the SF 36 sensitive to sleep disruption? A study in subjects with sleep apnoea.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Sleep Res       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.981

2.  EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Development and testing of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey summary scale scores in the United Kingdom. Results from a large-scale survey and a clinical trial.

Authors:  C Jenkinson; R Layte; K Lawrence
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 5.  Health effects of obstructive sleep apnoea and the effectiveness of continuous positive airways pressure: a systematic review of the research evidence.

Authors:  J Wright; R Johns; I Watt; A Melville; T Sheldon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-03-22

Review 6.  Standards for validating health measures: definition and content.

Authors:  J E Ware
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

7.  A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale.

Authors:  M W Johns
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.849

8.  Evaluation of index and profile measures of health status in a randomized controlled trial. Comparison of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, EuroQol, and disease specific measures.

Authors:  C Jenkinson; A Gray; H Doll; K Lawrence; S Keoghane; R Layte
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Measuring change over time: a comparison of results from a global single item of health status and the multi-dimensional SF-36 health status survey questionnaire in patients presenting with menorrhagia.

Authors:  C Jenkinson; V Peto; A Coulter
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status.

Authors:  L E Kazis; J J Anderson; R F Meenan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  21 in total

1.  Responsiveness of the EuroQol in breast cancer patients undergoing high dose chemotherapy.

Authors:  B Conner-Spady; C Cumming; J M Nabholtz; P Jacobs; D Stewart
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Measuring Quality of Live in Disorders of Sleep and Breathing.

Authors:  Marlene Reimer; W. Ward Flemons
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.816

3.  Visual analogical well-being scale for sleep apnea patients: validity and responsiveness : a test for clinical practice.

Authors:  Juan F Masa; Antonio Jiménez; Joaquín Durán; Carmen Carmona; Carmen Monasterio; Mercedes Mayos; Joaquín Terán; Ferrán Barbé; Manuela Rubio; Inmaculada Failde; Manuel Mota; José M Montserrat
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.816

4.  EQ-5D in a general population survey--a description of the most commonly reported EQ-5D health states using the SF-36.

Authors:  A Nordlund; K Ekberg; M Kristenson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Evaluation of the stages of completion and scoring of the Patient Generated Index (PGI) in patients with rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Andrew M Garratt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Quality of Life: Comparison of the SAQLI, FOSQ, and SF-36 Questionnaires.

Authors:  Graciela E Silva; James L Goodwin; Kimberly D Vana; Stuart F Quan
Journal:  Southwest J Pulm Crit Care       Date:  2016

7.  Impact of continuous positive airway pressure and oxygen on health status in patients with coronary heart disease, cardiovascular risk factors, and obstructive sleep apnea: A Heart Biomarker Evaluation in Apnea Treatment (HEARTBEAT) analysis.

Authors:  Eldrin F Lewis; Rui Wang; Naresh Punjabi; Daniel J Gottlieb; Stuart F Quan; Deepak L Bhatt; Sanjay R Patel; Reena Mehra; Roger S Blumenthal; Jia Weng; Michael Rueschman; Susan Redline
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  In support of an individualized approach to assessing quality of life: comparison between Patient Generated Index and standardized measures across four health conditions.

Authors:  Nancy E Mayo; Ala' Aburub; Marie-Josée Brouillette; Ayse Kuspinar; Carolina Moriello; Ana Maria Rodriguez; Susan Scott
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-12-17       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Performance of two measures of general health-related quality of life, the EQ-5D and the RAND-36 among critically ill patients.

Authors:  Anne Kaarlola; Ville Pettilä; Pertti Kekki
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-11-03       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire.

Authors:  Knut Stavem; Frank N Kjelsberg; Espen A Ruud
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.