Literature DB >> 10607157

Is the SF 36 sensitive to sleep disruption? A study in subjects with sleep apnoea.

.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to test the sensitivity of the short form 36 health survey questionnaire (SF 36) to sleep disruption in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and assess its use as an outcome measure for treatment with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Two hundred and twenty-three subjects under investigation for snoring and/or daytime somnolence completed the questionnaire at presentation and again after a six month period. Subjects with OSA requiring treatment scored lower on all dimensions of the SF 36 (P < 0.05) than normative scores for the general population. The largest differences were for vitality (24%) and social functioning (27.9%). After six months of treatment with CPAP there was an improvement in all scores and the score for vitality was no longer significantly different from that of the general population. The SF 36 is sensitive to the effects of sleep disruption in subjects with obstructive sleep apnoea, is a useful outcome measure for treatment with CPAP and its value in other sleep disorders should be assessed.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 10607157     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.1995.tb00167.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sleep Res        ISSN: 0962-1105            Impact factor:   3.981


  12 in total

Review 1.  Sleep. 4: Sleepiness, cognitive function, and quality of life in obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome.

Authors:  H M Engleman; N J Douglas
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Functional comorbidity index in sleep apnea.

Authors:  Corinna G Levine; Edward M Weaver
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 3.  Epidemiological aspects of obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  John F Garvey; Martino F Pengo; Panagis Drakatos; Brian D Kent
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Amsterdam positional OSA classification: the AASM 2012 recommended hypopnoea criteria increases the number of positional therapy candidates.

Authors:  Brett Duce; Antti Kulkas; Christian Langton; Juha Töyräs; Craig Hukins
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 2.816

5.  Nasal continuous positive airway pressure improves quality of life in obesity hypoventilation syndrome.

Authors:  Wataru Hida; Shinichi Okabe; Koichiro Tatsumi; Hiroshi Kimura; Tsuneto Akasiba; Kazuo Chin; Motoharu Ohi; Hideaki Nakayama; Makoto Satoh; Takayuki Kuriyama
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.816

6.  How should we evaluate health status? A comparison of three methods in patients presenting with obstructive sleep apnoea.

Authors:  C Jenkinson; J Stradling; S Petersen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Impact of Le-Fort I osteotomy on anatomical and functional aspects of the nasal airway and on quality of life.

Authors:  Karim Zaoui; Reinald Kuehle; Ingo Baumann; Dorothee Laura Schuessler; Oliver Ristow; Michaela Plath; Christian Freudlsperger
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Randomised placebo controlled trial of daytime function after continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy for the sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome.

Authors:  H M Engleman; S E Martin; R N Kingshott; T W Mackay; I J Deary; N J Douglas
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 9.  Pharmacotherapies for obstructive sleep apnoea: where are we now?

Authors:  Ian E Smith; Timothy G Quinnell
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Health status in subjects with suspected obstructive sleep apnea and comparison with a general population.

Authors:  Kornelia K Beiske; Knut Stavem
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.