Literature DB >> 25480594

Comparative characterization of maxillary expansion and alternate maxillary expansions and constrictions in rats.

Guang-Yao Feng1, Bing-Shuang Zou2, Xiang-Long Zeng3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the cranial and circumaxillary sutures react differently to maxillary expansion (ME) and alternate maxillary expansions and constrictions (Alt-MEC) in a rat model. Twenty-two male Sprague-Dawley rats (6 weeks old) were used and divided into three groups. In ME group (n=9), an expander was activated for 5 days. In Alt-MEC group (9 animals), an alternate expansion and constriction protocol (5-day expansion and 5-day constriction for one cycle) was conducted for 2.5 cycles (25 days total). The control group comprised 4 animals with no appliances used, each of two sacrificed on day 5 and day 25 respectively. Midpalatal suture expansion or constriction levels were assessed qualitatively and quantitatively by bite-wing X-rays and cast models. Distances between two central incisors and two maxillary first molars were measured on cast models after each activation. Circumaxillary sutures (midpalatal, maxillopalatine, premaxillary, zygomaticotemporal and frontonasal suture) in each group were characterized histologically. Results showed that midpalatal suture was widened and restored after each expansion and constriction. At the end of activation, the widths between both central incisors and first molars in Alt-MEC group were significantly larger than those in ME group (P<0.05). Histologically, all five circumaxillary sutures studied were widened in multiple zones in Alt-MEC group. However, only midpalatal suture was expanded with cellular fibrous tissue filling in ME group. Significant osteoclast hyperplasia was observed in all circumaxillary sutures after alternate expansions and constrictions, but osteoclast count increase was only observed in midpalatal suture in ME group. These results suggested that cranial and circumaxillary sutures were actively reconstructed after Alt-MEC, while only midpalatal suture had active reaction after ME.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25480594     DOI: 10.1007/s11596-014-1377-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci        ISSN: 1672-0733


  40 in total

1.  Activation-deactivation rapid palatal expansion and reverse headgear in Class III cases.

Authors:  Devrim Isci; Tamer Turk; Selma Elekdag-Turk
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Effects of rapid maxillary expansion with a memory palatal split screw on the morphology of the maxillary dental arch and nasal airway resistance.

Authors:  Koray Halicioğlu; Nihat Kiliç; İbrahim Yavuz; Bülent Aktan
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  A new protocol for maxillary protraction in cleft patients: repetitive weekly protocol of alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions.

Authors:  Eric Jein-Wein Liou; Wen-Ching Tsai
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2005-03

4.  Opening of circumaxillary sutures by alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions.

Authors:  Yu-Chi Wang; Peter M S Chang; Eric Jein-Wein Liou
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Palatal expansion: just the beginning of dentofacial orthopedics.

Authors:  A J Haas
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1970-03

6.  An orthopedic approach to the treatment of Class III malocclusion in young patients.

Authors:  J A McNamara
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1987-09

7.  Stress distributions in the maxillary complex from orthopedic headgear forces.

Authors:  K Tanne; S Matsubara; M Sakuda
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Anchorage and retentive effects of a bisphosphonate (AHBuBP) on tooth movements in rats.

Authors:  K Igarashi; H Mitani; H Adachi; H Shinoda
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Effects of a bonded rapid maxillary expansion appliance during orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  T U Memikoglu; H Işeri
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Cephalometric and occlusal changes following maxillary expansion and protraction.

Authors:  P Ngan; C Yiu; A Hu; U Hägg; S H Wei; E Gunel
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.