Literature DB >> 24182587

Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary changes associated with facemask and rapid maxillary expansion compared with bone anchored maxillary protraction.

Claudia Toyama Hino1, Lucia H S Cevidanes, Tung T Nguyen, Hugo J De Clerck, Lorenzo Franchi, James A McNamara.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Our objectives in this study were to evaluate in 3 dimensions the growth and treatment effects on the midface and the maxillary dentition produced by facemask therapy in association with rapid maxillary expansion (RME/FM) compared with bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP).
METHODS: Forty-six patients with Class III malocclusion were treated with either RME/FM (n = 21) or BAMP (n = 25). Three-dimensional models generated from cone-beam computed tomographic scans, taken before and after approximately 1 year of treatment, were registered on the anterior cranial base and measured using color-coded maps and semitransparent overlays.
RESULTS: The skeletal changes in the maxilla and the right and left zygomas were on average 2.6 mm in the RME/FM group and 3.7 mm in the BAMP group; these were different statistically. Seven RME/FM patients and 4 BAMP patients had a predominantly vertical displacement of the maxilla. The dental changes at the maxillary incisors were on average 3.2 mm in the RME/FM group and 4.3 mm in the BAMP group. Ten RME/FM patients had greater dental compensations than skeletal changes.
CONCLUSIONS: This 3-dimensional study shows that orthopedic changes can be obtained with both RME/FM and BAMP treatments, with protraction of the maxilla and the zygomas. Approximately half of the RME/FM patients had greater dental than skeletal changes, and a third of the RME/FM compared with 17% of the BAMP patients had a predominantly vertical maxillary displacement.
Copyright © 2013 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24182587      PMCID: PMC3972125          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  32 in total

1.  Sagittal changes after maxillary protraction with expansion in class III patients in the primary, mixed, and late mixed dentitions: a longitudinal retrospective study.

Authors:  M Saadia; E Torres
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Degree of stability following experimental alteration of midfacial growth with heavy intermittent force [proceedings].

Authors:  R Cederquist
Journal:  Proc Inst Med Chic       Date:  1978 Jul-Sep

3.  Comparison between traditional 2-dimensional cephalometry and a 3-dimensional approach on human dry skulls.

Authors:  Gregory L Adams; Stuart A Gansky; Arthur J Miller; William E Harrell; David C Hatcher
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Protraction of maxilla in rhesus monkeys by controlled extraoral forces.

Authors:  R Nanda
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1978-08

5.  Orthopedic correction of Class III malocclusion with palatal expansion and custom protraction headgear.

Authors:  P K Turley
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1988-05

6.  An orthopedic approach to the treatment of Class III malocclusion in young patients.

Authors:  J A McNamara
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1987-09

7.  The postnatal development of the palatomaxillary region studied on human autopsy material.

Authors:  B Melsen; F Melsen
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1982-10

8.  Dentofacial changes produced by extraoral forward force in the Macaca irus.

Authors:  T Kambara
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1977-03

9.  Experimental and postexperimental response to anteriorly directed extraoral force in young Macaca nemestrina.

Authors:  G W Jackson; V G Kokich; P A Shapiro
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1979-03

10.  Skeletal changes of maxillary protraction in patients exhibiting skeletal class III malocclusion: a comparison of three skeletal maturation groups.

Authors:  Kyung-Suk Cha
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.079

View more
  19 in total

1.  Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Eman H Elabbassy; Noha E Sabet; Islam T Hassan; Dina H Elghoul; Marwa A Elkassaby
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Zygomaticomaxillary suture maturation: Part II-The influence of sutural maturation on the response to maxillary protraction.

Authors:  F Angelieri; A C Ruellas; M S Yatabe; L H S Cevidanes; L Franchi; C Toyama-Hino; H J De Clerck; T Nguyen; J A McNamara
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Midface Morphology and Growth in Syndromic Craniosynostosis Patients Following Frontofacial Monobloc Distraction.

Authors:  Cristiano Tonello; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Antonio C O Ruellas; Nivaldo Alonso
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb 01       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Reliability of three-dimensional anterior cranial base superimposition methods for assessment of overall hard tissue changes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Cecilia Ponce-Garcia; Manuel Lagravere-Vich; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes; Antonio Carlos de Olivera Ruellas; Jason Carey; Carlos Flores-Mir
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Dental compensation for skeletal Class III malocclusion by isolated extraction of mandibular teeth. Part 1: Occlusal situation 12 years after completion of active treatment.

Authors:  Bernd Zimmer; Sarah Schenk-Kazan
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Comparison of facemask therapy effects using skeletal and tooth-borne anchorage.

Authors:  Hyeon-Jong Lee; Dong-Soon Choi; Insan Jang; Bong-Kuen Cha
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 7.  Bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP): A review.

Authors:  Apoorva Kamath; Shetty Suhani Sudhakar; Greeshma Kannan; Kripal Rai; Athul Sb
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2022-05-04

8.  Compensation of skeletal Class III malocclusion by isolated extraction of mandibular teeth: Part 2: Skeletal, dentoalveolar and soft tissue parameters in comparison with nonextraction Class III therapies.

Authors:  Bernd Zimmer; Sarah Gaida; Henning Dathe
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  Sutural deformation during bone-anchored maxillary protraction.

Authors:  Taylor Rae Vracar; Wanda Claro; Michael Eli Vracar; Randall Stetson Jenkins; Lane Bland; Ayman Al Dayeh
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-05-21

10.  Condylar response to functional therapy with Twin-Block as shown by cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Ersin Yildirim; Seniz Karacay; Mustafa Erkan
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 2.684

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.