Literature DB >> 9509578

The neighborhood characteristics of malapropisms.

M S Vitevitch1.   

Abstract

This study examined the phonological neighborhood characteristics (frequency, density, and neighborhood frequency) of 138 malapropisms. Malapropisms are whole word substitutions that are phonologically, but not semantically, related. A statistical analysis of a speech error corpus suggests that neighborhood density and word frequency differentially affected the number of malapropisms. Specifically, a greater number of malapropisms were found among high frequency words with dense neighborhoods than with sparse neighborhoods. Exactly the opposite pattern was found among low frequency words. That is, more errors were found among low frequency words with sparse neighborhoods than with dense neighborhoods. More malapropisms resided in low frequency neighborhoods than in high. The average word frequency, average neighborhood density, and average neighborhood frequency of the malapropisms were significantly lower than the same averages computed from randomly sampled control words. Finally, more target words were replaced by error words that had relatively higher frequency than by error words that had relatively lower frequency. The implications of these findings for models of lexical representation and processing are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9509578     DOI: 10.1177/002383099704000301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Speech        ISSN: 0023-8309            Impact factor:   1.500


  36 in total

1.  Constraints upon word substitution speech errors.

Authors:  T A Harley; S B Macandre
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2001-07

2.  The facilitative influence of phonological similarity and neighborhood frequency in speech production in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Mitchell S Sommers
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-06

3.  Naturalistic and experimental analyses of word frequency and neighborhood density effects in slips of the ear.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.500

4.  The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Mrs. Malaprop's Neighborhood: Using Word Errors to Reveal Neighborhood Structure.

Authors:  Matthew Goldrick; Jocelyn R Folk; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  Lexical neighborhood density effects on spoken word recognition and production in healthy aging.

Authors:  Vanessa Taler; Geoffrey P Aaron; Lauren G Steinmetz; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.077

7.  Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Jonna Armbrüster; Tiffany P Hogan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Sensitivity to phonological similarity within and across languages.

Authors:  Viorica Marian; Henrike K Blumenfeld; Olga V Boukrina
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2008-05

9.  The spread of the phonological neighborhood influences spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-01

10.  The influence of the phonological neighborhood clustering coefficient on spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Kit Ying Chan; Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.