Literature DB >> 9507625

The effects of external compression by three different retractors on pressure in the erector spine muscles during and after posterior lumbar spine surgery in humans.

J R Styf1, J Willén.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: An experimental study on patients undergoing posterior lumbar spine surgery.
OBJECTIVES: To study the relation between external compression and muscle strain induced by spinal retractors and intramuscular pressure in the dorsolumbar compartment during posterior spinal surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pressures were studied as a function of the distance between the retractor blades during surgery.
METHODS: Intramuscular pressure was measured bilaterally in the erector spinae muscle with intermittent microcapillary infusion technique in 12 patients undergoing posterior lumbar spine surgery during 271 (range 90-420) minutes. Three self-retaining retractors were tested; the McCulloch, the Viking, and the Richard retractors.
RESULTS: Intramuscular pressure was 7.7 mm Hg before surgery. It varied between 35 mm Hg and 69 mm Hg during surgical exposure of the laminas and facet joints. Intramuscular pressure varied between 61 mm Hg and 158 mm Hg depending on which retractor was used and on the distance between the retractor blades. Intramuscular pressure never exceeded 30 mm Hg at rest after the operation.
CONCLUSIONS: External compression and muscle strain from retractor blades during surgery increased intramuscular pressure in the paravertebral muscles to levels that, according to other studies, induce ischemia in the muscles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9507625     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199802010-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  45 in total

1.  Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Yue Zhou; Zheng Feng Zhang; Chang Qing Li; Wen Jie Zheng; Jie Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  [SENDS criteria from the diversification of MAST procedures. Implementation of preoperative simulation].

Authors:  B Rieger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Percutaneous pars interarticularis screw fixation: a technical note.

Authors:  Lester Wilson; Farhaan Altaf; Philippa Tyler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Intraoperative measurement of pharynx/esophagus retraction during anterior cervical surgery. Part I: pressure.

Authors:  Oliver Heese; Frank Schröder; Manfred Westphal; Luca Papavero
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  [Pain therapy after spinal surgery].

Authors:  F Geiger; P Kessler; M Rauschmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  A minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spine instabilities.

Authors:  C A Logroscino; L Proietti; E Pola; L Scaramuzzo; F C Tamburrelli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Comparison of superior-level facet joint violations during open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Ranjith Babu; Jong G Park; Ankit I Mehta; Tony Shan; Peter M Grossi; Christopher R Brown; William J Richardson; Robert E Isaacs; Carlos A Bagley; Maragatha Kuchibhatla; Oren N Gottfried
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  The quantitative analysis of back muscle degeneration after posterior lumbar fusion: comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open surgery.

Authors:  Sang-Hyuk Min; Myung-Ho Kim; Joong-Bae Seo; Jee-Young Lee; Dae-Hee Lee
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2009-12-31

9.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Alan T Villavicencio; Sigita Burneikiene; Cassandra M Roeca; E Lee Nelson; Alexander Mason
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2010-05-31

10.  Propofol inhibits pressure-stimulated macrophage phagocytosis via the GABAA receptor and dysregulation of p130cas phosphorylation.

Authors:  Hiroe Shiratsuchi; Yasser Kouatli; Guang Xiang Yu; Harold M Marsh; Marc D Basson
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 4.249

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.