Literature DB >> 26443329

[SENDS criteria from the diversification of MAST procedures. Implementation of preoperative simulation].

B Rieger1.   

Abstract

CLINICAL ISSUE: Minimal access spinal technologies (MAST) lead to a diversification of surgical procedures, which requires careful selection of the procedure and outcome monitoring. For a rational selection of the procedure simulation, endoscopy, navigation, decompression and stabilization (SENDS) criteria can be derived from the development of the MAST procedures. Preoperative simulation has diagnostic and therapeutic values. The SENDS criteria can be verified indirectly via outcome control. STANDARD TREATMENT: Biomechanically meaningful diagnostic x-rays of the spinal segment to be surgically treated are currently carried out with the patient in inclination and reclination. TREATMENT INNOVATIONS: Software-related preoperative simulation based on these x-ray images facilitates the selection and implementation of the MAST procedure. DIAGNOSTIC WORK-UP: For preoperative simulation motion shots are needed in inclination, neutral position and reclination and the dimensions can be obtained using an x-ray ball or a computed tomography (CT) scan. PERFORMANCE: The SENDS criteria are useful because established procedures based on these criteria reach a comparable outcome. Preoperative simulation appears to be a useful selection criterion. ACHIEVEMENTS: Preoperatively it is necessary to collate patient and segment information in order to provide each patient with individualized treatment. So far there is no evidence for a better outcome after preoperative simulation but a reduction of surgery time and intraoperative radiation exposure could already be demonstrated. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Minimally invasive methods should be preferred if there is a comparable outcome. The establishment of new procedures has to be accompanied by the maintenance of a spine register. Minimally invasive surgical procedures should be individualized for each patient and segment. Mobility X-ray images should be prepared for use with the preoperative simulation as the information content significantly increases with respect to the MAST procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biokinemetrics; Lumbar interbody fusion; Minimal access spinal technology; Preoperative simulation; Spinal navigation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26443329     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-015-0020-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  25 in total

1.  Endoscopic foraminotomy using MED system in cadaveric specimens.

Authors:  S W Roh; D H Kim; A C Cardoso; R G Fessler
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  New percutaneous access method for minimally invasive anterior lumbosacral surgery.

Authors:  Andrew Cragg; Allen Carl; Flavio Casteneda; Curtis Dickman; Lee Guterman; Carlos Oliveira
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2004-02

Review 3.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: indications, technique, and complications.

Authors:  Langston T Holly; James D Schwender; David P Rouben; Kevin T Foley
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 4.047

4.  Posterior cervical foraminotomy for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy.

Authors:  Michael G Fehlings; Randolph J Gray
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2009-04

5.  The learning curve of minimally-invasive lumbar microdiscectomy.

Authors:  Gregory S McLoughlin; Daryl R Fourney
Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.104

6.  The effects of external compression by three different retractors on pressure in the erector spine muscles during and after posterior lumbar spine surgery in humans.

Authors:  J R Styf; J Willén
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Treatment of painful osteoporotic or traumatic vertebral compression fractures by percutaneous vertebral augmentation procedures: a nonrandomized comparison between vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Pasquale De Negri; Tiziana Tirri; Gianluca Paternoster; Pasqualina Modano
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.442

8.  [Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty].

Authors:  P Galibert; H Deramond; P Rosat; D Le Gars
Journal:  Neurochirurgie       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.553

9.  Minimally invasive anterior retroperitoneal approach to the lumbar spine. Emphasis on the lateral BAK.

Authors:  P C McAfee; J J Regan; W P Geis; I L Fedder
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Keyhole approach for posterior cervical discectomy: experience on 84 patients.

Authors:  Y S Cağlar; M Bozkurt; G Kahilogullari; H Tuna; A Bakir; F Torun; H C Ugur
Journal:  Minim Invasive Neurosurg       Date:  2007-02
View more
  1 in total

1.  Prospective surgical solutions in degenerative spine: spinal simulation for optimal choice of implant and targeted device development.

Authors:  Monique Salchow-Gille; Bernhard Rieger; Clemens Reinshagen; Marek Molcanyi; Joschka Lemke; Uta Brautferger; Kerim Hakan Sitoci-Ficici; Witold Polanski; Thomas Pinzer; Gabriele Schackert
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2021-04-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.