Literature DB >> 12460222

Medical tests: women's reported and preferred decision-making roles and preferences for information on benefits, side-effects and false results.

Heather M Davey1, Alexandra L Barratt, Elizabeth Davey, Phyllis N Butow, Sally Redman, Nehmat Houssami, Glenn P Salkeld.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine women's preferences for and reported experience with medical test decision-making.
DESIGN: Computer-assisted telephone survey. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred and fifty-two women resident in households randomly selected from the New South Wales electronic white pages. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reported and preferred test and treatment (for comparison) decision-making, satisfaction with and anxiety about information on false results and side-effects; and effect of anxiety on desire for such information.
RESULTS: Overall most women preferred to share test (94.6%) and treatment (91.2%) decision-making equally with their doctor, or to take a more active role, with only 5.4-8.9% reporting they wanted the doctor to make these decisions on their behalf. This pattern was consistent across all age groups. In general, women reported experiencing a decision-making role that was consistent with their preference. Women who had a usual doctor were more likely to report experiencing an active role in decision-making. More women reported receiving as much information as they wanted about the benefits of tests and treatment than about the side-effects of tests and treatment. Most women wanted information about the possibility of false test results (91.5%) and test side-effects (95.6%), but many reported the doctor never provided this information (false results = 40.0% and side-effects = 31.3%). A substantial proportion said this information would make them anxious (false results = 56.6% and side-effects = 43.1%), but reported they wanted the information anyway (false results = 77.6% and side-effects = 88.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: Women prefer an active role in test and treatment decision-making. Many women reported receiving inadequate information. If so, this may jeopardize informed decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12460222      PMCID: PMC5142735          DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00194.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  25 in total

1.  Paternalism or partnership? Patients have grown up-and there's no going back.

Authors:  A Coulter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

2.  Reliability and validity of women's recall of mammographic screening.

Authors:  A Barratt; J Cockburn; D Smith; S Redman
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.939

3.  Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients.

Authors:  J Ende; L Kazis; A Ash; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Four models of the physician-patient relationship.

Authors:  E J Emanuel; L L Emanuel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992 Apr 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making.

Authors:  A Coulter
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1997-04

6.  The dynamics of change: cancer patients' preferences for information, involvement and support.

Authors:  P N Butow; M Maclean; S M Dunn; M H Tattersall; M J Boyer
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Mammographic screening: results from the 1996 National Breast Health Survey.

Authors:  A L Barratt; J Cockburn; S Redman; C Paul; J Perkins
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1997-11-17       Impact factor: 7.738

8.  Evidence-informed patient choice. Practical issues of involving patients in decisions about health care technologies.

Authors:  V A Entwistle; T A Sheldon; A Sowden; I S Watt
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.188

9.  Information and decision-making preferences of men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  B J Davison; L F Degner; T R Morgan
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Relationship between preferences for decisional control and illness information among women with breast cancer: a quantitative and qualitative analysis.

Authors:  T F Hack; L F Degner; D G Dyck
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  18 in total

1.  Presentation on websites of possible benefits and harms from screening for breast cancer: cross sectional study.

Authors:  Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-17

2.  Avoiding piecemeal research on participation in cervical cancer screening: the advantages of a social identity framework.

Authors:  Candice Tribe; Janine Webb
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Effect of Health Literacy on Decision-Making Preferences among Medically Underserved Patients.

Authors:  Joann Seo; Melody S Goodman; Mary Politi; Melvin Blanchard; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  The clinical breast exam: a skill that should not be abandoned.

Authors:  Teresa Bryan; Erin Snyder
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Betty Chewning; Carma L Bylund; Bupendra Shah; Neeraj K Arora; Jennifer A Gueguen; Gregory Makoul
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-04-06

6.  A matter of trust--patient's views on decision-making in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Glenn Salkeld; Michael Solomon; Leonie Short; Phyllis N Butow
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Patients' involvement in decisions about medicines: GPs' perceptions of their preferences.

Authors:  Kate Cox; Nicky Britten; Richard Hooper; Patrick White
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Consumer information materials for diagnostic breast tests: women's views on information and their understanding of test results.

Authors:  Heather M Davey; Jacqueline Lim; Phyllis N Butow; Alexandra L Barratt; Nehmat Houssami; Roberta Higginson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Choosing between CT colonography and colonoscopy in the diagnostic context: a qualitative study of influences on patient preferences.

Authors:  Christian von Wagner; Steve Halligan; Wendy S Atkin; Richard J Lilford; Dion Morton; Jane Wardle
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  A community study using specified and unspecified scenarios to investigate men's views about PSA screening.

Authors:  Melina Gattellari; Jeanette E Ward
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.