Literature DB >> 9501100

Selectivity, sharing and competitive interactions in the regulation of Hoxb genes.

J Sharpe1, S Nonchev, A Gould, J Whiting, R Krumlauf.   

Abstract

The clustered organisation of Hox complexes is highly conserved in vertebrates and the reasons for this are believed to be linked with the regulatory mechanisms governing their expression. In analysis of the Hoxb4-Hoxb6 region of the HoxB complex we identified enhancers which lie in the intergenic region between Hoxb4 and Hoxb5, and which are capable of mediating the correct boundaries of neural and mesodermal expression for Hoxb5. We examined their regulatory properties in the context of the local genomic region spanning the two genes by transgenic analysis, in which each promoter was independently marked with a different reporter, to monitor simultaneously the relative transcriptional read-outs from each gene. Our analysis revealed that within this intergenic region: (i) a limb and a neural enhancer selectively activate Hoxb4 as opposed to Hoxb5; (ii) a separate neural enhancer is able to activate both genes, but expression is dependent upon competition between the two promoters for the enhancer and is influenced by the local genomic context; (iii) mesodermal enhancer activities can be shared between the genes. We found similar types of regulatory interactions between Hoxb5 and Hoxb6. Together these results provide evidence for three separate general mechanisms: selectivity, competition and sharing, that control the balance of cis-regulatory interactions necessary for generating the proper spatial and temporal patterns of Hox gene expression. We suggest that these mechanisms are part of a regulatory basis for maintenance of Hox organisation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9501100      PMCID: PMC1170526          DOI: 10.1093/emboj/17.6.1788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  50 in total

1.  A 3' remote control region is a candidate to modulate Hoxb-8 expression boundaries.

Authors:  I Valarché; W de Graaff; J Deschamps
Journal:  Int J Dev Biol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.203

2.  A conserved retinoic acid response element required for early expression of the homeobox gene Hoxb-1.

Authors:  H Marshall; M Studer; H Pöpperl; S Aparicio; A Kuroiwa; S Brenner; R Krumlauf
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-08-18       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Hox genes in vertebrate development.

Authors:  R Krumlauf
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-07-29       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Role of a conserved retinoic acid response element in rhombomere restriction of Hoxb-1.

Authors:  M Studer; H Pöpperl; H Marshall; A Kuroiwa; R Krumlauf
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Multiple positive and negative regulatory elements in the promoter of the mouse homeobox gene Hoxb-4.

Authors:  A Gutman; J Gilthorpe; P W Rigby
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Analysis of LacZ reporter genes in transgenic embryos suggests the presence of several cis-acting regulatory elements in the murine Hoxb-6 gene.

Authors:  R Eid; H Koseki; K Schughart
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.780

7.  The zinc finger gene Krox20 regulates HoxB2 (Hox2.8) during hindbrain segmentation.

Authors:  M H Sham; C Vesque; S Nonchev; H Marshall; M Frain; R D Gupta; J Whiting; D Wilkinson; P Charnay; R Krumlauf
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-01-29       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Sequences 5' of the homeobox of the Hox-1.4 gene direct tissue-specific expression of lacZ during mouse development.

Authors:  R R Behringer; D A Crotty; V M Tennyson; R L Brinster; R D Palmiter; D J Wolgemuth
Journal:  Development       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  Proximal cis-acting elements cooperate to set Hoxb-7 (Hox-2.3) expression boundaries in transgenic mice.

Authors:  R Vogels; J Charité; W de Graaff; J Deschamps
Journal:  Development       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  Compatibility between enhancers and promoters determines the transcriptional specificity of gooseberry and gooseberry neuro in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  X Li; M Noll
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1994-01-15       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  49 in total

1.  Analysis of a complete homeobox gene repertoire: implications for the evolution of diversity.

Authors:  C Kappen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Zebrafish retinoic acid receptors function as context-dependent transcriptional activators.

Authors:  Joshua S Waxman; Deborah Yelon
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.582

3.  Promoter competition as a mechanism of transcriptional interference mediated by retrotransposons.

Authors:  Caroline Conte; Bernard Dastugue; Chantal Vaury
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Promoter-proximal tethering elements regulate enhancer-promoter specificity in the Drosophila Antennapedia complex.

Authors:  Vincent C Calhoun; Angelike Stathopoulos; Michael Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Randomly inserted and targeted Hox/reporter fusions transcriptionally silenced in Polycomb mutants.

Authors:  Wim d Graaff; Daihachiro Tomotsune; Tony Oosterveen; Yoshihiro Takihara; Haruhiko Koseki; Jacqueline Deschamps
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Enhancer choice in cis and in trans in Drosophila melanogaster: role of the promoter.

Authors:  James R Morris; Dmitri A Petrov; Anne M Lee; Chao-Ting Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Transcriptional activators and activation mechanisms.

Authors:  Jun Ma
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 14.870

8.  A highly conserved enhancer in the Dlx5/Dlx6 intergenic region is the site of cross-regulatory interactions between Dlx genes in the embryonic forebrain.

Authors:  T Zerucha; T Stühmer; G Hatch; B K Park; Q Long; G Yu; A Gambarotta; J R Schultz; J L Rubenstein; M Ekker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Analysis of HSC activity and compensatory Hox gene expression profile in Hoxb cluster mutant fetal liver cells.

Authors:  Janet Bijl; Alexander Thompson; Ramiro Ramirez-Solis; Jana Krosl; David G Grier; H Jeffrey Lawrence; Guy Sauvageau
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 10.  Hox genes and their candidate downstream targets in the developing central nervous system.

Authors:  Z N Akin; A J Nazarali
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.