Literature DB >> 8313885

Compatibility between enhancers and promoters determines the transcriptional specificity of gooseberry and gooseberry neuro in the Drosophila embryo.

X Li1, M Noll.   

Abstract

The two Drosophila genes gooseberry (gsb) and gooseberry neuro (gsbn) are closely apposed and divergently transcribed. While gsb is a segment-polarity gene and mainly expressed in the epidermis, gsbn is expressed in the central nervous system. An intriguing question is how their transcriptional specificity arises. Here we show that different non-overlapping enhancer or upstream control elements drive the specific expression of gsb and gsbn. Specificity of these enhancers for their genes is achieved by their inability to activate transcription in combination with the heterologous promoter of the other gene. These results therefore suggest that compatibility between the enhancer and its cognate promoter is a mechanism ensuring transcriptional specificity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8313885      PMCID: PMC394821          DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06274.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  27 in total

1.  The Drosophila sloppy paired locus encodes two proteins involved in segmentation that show homology to mammalian transcription factors.

Authors:  U Grossniklaus; R K Pearson; W J Gehring
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Every enhancer works with every promoter for all the combinations tested: could new regulatory pathways evolve by enhancer shuffling?

Authors:  M Kermekchiev; M Pettersson; P Matthias; W Schaffner
Journal:  Gene Expr       Date:  1991-04

3.  A position-effect assay for boundaries of higher order chromosomal domains.

Authors:  R Kellum; P Schedl
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-03-08       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Conservation of a large protein domain in the segmentation gene paired and in functionally related genes of Drosophila.

Authors:  D Bopp; M Burri; S Baumgartner; G Frigerio; M Noll
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1986-12-26       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Genetic transformation of Drosophila with transposable element vectors.

Authors:  G M Rubin; A C Spradling
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-10-22       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Promoter specificity of basal transcription factors.

Authors:  J D Parvin; H T Timmers; P A Sharp
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-03-20       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  The gooseberry-zipper region of Drosophila: five genes encode different spatially restricted transcripts in the embryo.

Authors:  S Côté; A Preiss; J Haller; R Schuh; A Kienlin; E Seifert; H Jäckle
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Analysis of the gooseberry locus in Drosophila embryos: gooseberry determines the cuticular pattern and activates gooseberry neuro.

Authors:  T Gutjahr; N H Patel; X Li; C S Goodman; M Noll
Journal:  Development       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  The bluetail transposon: evidence for independent cis-regulatory domains and domain boundaries in the bithorax complex.

Authors:  M Galloni; H Gyurkovics; P Schedl; F Karch
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Separable regulatory elements mediate the establishment and maintenance of cell states by the Drosophila segment-polarity gene gooseberry.

Authors:  X Li; T Gutjahr; M Noll
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  37 in total

1.  Complex organization of promoter and enhancer elements regulate the tissue- and developmental stage-specific expression of the Drosophila melanogaster Gld gene.

Authors:  B L Keplinger; X Guo; J Quine; Y Feng; D R Cavener
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Enhancer-promoter specificity mediated by DPE or TATA core promoter motifs.

Authors:  J E Butler; J T Kadonaga
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Long-range enhancer-promoter interactions in the Scr-Antp interval of the Drosophila Antennapedia complex.

Authors:  Vincent C Calhoun; Michael Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Core promoter elements can regulate transcription on a separate chromosome in trans.

Authors:  J R Morris; P K Geyer; C T Wu
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-02-01       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Different core promoters possess distinct regulatory activities in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  S Ohtsuki; M Levine; H N Cai
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-02-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  The gap protein knirps mediates both quenching and direct repression in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  D N Arnosti; S Gray; S Barolo; J Zhou; M Levine
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Independence and interdependence of the three human aldolase A promoters in transgenic mice.

Authors:  C Moch; A Kahn; D Daegelen
Journal:  Gene Expr       Date:  1996

8.  Promoter shape varies across populations and affects promoter evolution and expression noise.

Authors:  Ignacio E Schor; Jacob F Degner; Dermot Harnett; Enrico Cannavò; Francesco P Casale; Heejung Shim; David A Garfield; Ewan Birney; Matthew Stephens; Oliver Stegle; Eileen E M Furlong
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Novel embryonic regulation of Ca(2+)-activated K+ channel expression in Drosophila.

Authors:  T Thomas; B Wang; R Brenner; N S Atkinson
Journal:  Invert Neurosci       Date:  1997-03

10.  Genomic regulatory blocks underlie extensive microsynteny conservation in insects.

Authors:  Pär G Engström; Shannan J Ho Sui; Oyvind Drivenes; Thomas S Becker; Boris Lenhard
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.