Literature DB >> 1534726

The natural course of lumbar spinal stenosis.

K E Johnsson1, I Rosén, A Udén.   

Abstract

The course of 32 untreated patients with spinal stenosis was studied. The mean patient age was 60 years, and the mean period of observation was 49 months. About 75% of the patients had spinal claudication. In the follow-up survey, the same number of patients had claudication, but the symptoms were milder. In estimation by visual analog scale, symptoms in 70% of the cases were unchanged, 15% showed improvement, and 15% worsened. No proof of severe deterioration was found after four years, and expectant observation may be an alternative to surgical treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1534726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  58 in total

1.  [Longterm results of the interspinous spacer X-STOP].

Authors:  A Reinhardt; S Hufnagel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Prediction of long-term clinical outcome in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  B Micankova Adamova; S Vohanka; L Dusek; J Jarkovsky; J Bednarik
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  [Minimally invasive injection therapy in lumbar syndromes].

Authors:  O Linhardt; M Madl; D Boluki; T Renkawitz; J Matussek; U Quint; J Grifka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  The effect of duration of symptoms on standard outcome measures in the surgical treatment of spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Leslie C L Ng; Suhayl Tafazal; Philip Sell
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  [Minimally invasive injection therapy for patients with radicular lumbar spine syndrome. First results of an minimally invasive treatment for patients with lumbar radiculopathy].

Authors:  M Madl; O Linhardt; D Boluki; J Matussek; T Renkawitz; J Grifka
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.107

6.  Chiropractic treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Kent Stuber; Sandy Sajko; Kevyn Kristmanson
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2009-06

7.  A novel method for the quantitative evaluation of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Fengyu Zheng; James C Farmer; Harvinder S Sandhu; Patrick F O'Leary
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2006-09

8.  Decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: long-term results.

Authors:  Ioannis D Gelalis; Kosmas S Stafilas; Anastasios V Korompilias; Konstantinos C Zacharis; Alexandros E Beris; Theodoros A Xenakis
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-11-25       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results.

Authors:  J F Zucherman; K Y Hsu; C A Hartjen; T F Mehalic; D A Implicito; M J Martin; D R Johnson; G A Skidmore; P P Vessa; J W Dwyer; S Puccio; J C Cauthen; R M Ozuna
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Does multilevel lumbar stenosis lead to poorer outcomes?: a subanalysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) lumbar stenosis study.

Authors:  Daniel K Park; Howard S An; Jon D Lurie; Wenyan Zhao; Anna Tosteson; Tor D Tosteson; Harry Herkowitz; Thomas Errico; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.