Literature DB >> 1534725

Newest knowledge of low back pain. A critical look.

A L Nachemson1.   

Abstract

Scientific scrutiny of the low back problem demonstrates its socioeconomic importance in most industrialized societies. Natural history studies reveal that the prognosis for the low back pain patient is excellent; for those with sciatica and painful spondylolisthesis it is good. It is even relatively good for those older patients with symptoms of spinal stenosis. Although today there is a better understanding of pain, the pathomechanism of low back pain is unknown. However, for patients with sciatica, spondylolisthesis, and spinal stenosis, physicians are beginning to get a better perception of what causes the pain. Psychosocial factors, including insurance benefits, have been demonstrated to be more important than biomechanical workload not only for acute but also for chronic low back pain patients who are unable to work. Orthopedic surgeons must recognize this fact when contemplating operations for patients with ill-defined back syndromes. Rarely are diagnoses scientifically valid, nor is the effectiveness of surgery proven by acceptable clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1534725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  54 in total

1.  Prognostic factors and treatment-related changes associated with return to work in the multimodal treatment of chronic back pain.

Authors:  A A Vendrig
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1999-06

2.  Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of a disability prevention model for back pain management: a six year follow up study.

Authors:  P Loisel; J Lemaire; S Poitras; M-J Durand; F Champagne; S Stock; B Diallo; C Tremblay
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 3.  Psychosocial factors at work in relation to low back pain and consequences of low back pain; a systematic, critical review of prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  J Hartvigsen; S Lings; C Leboeuf-Yde; L Bakketeig
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Fear of movement/injury in the general population: factor structure and psychometric properties of an adapted version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia.

Authors:  R M A Houben; M Leeuw; J W S Vlaeyen; L Goubert; H S J Picavet
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2005-09-27

Review 5.  [Functional disorders and functional diseases in the region of the upper cervical spine particularly regarding the cervical joints. Current status and clinical relevance].

Authors:  R Kayser; C E Heyde
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Lumbar-pelvic range and coordination during lifting tasks.

Authors:  A Maduri; B L Pearson; S E Wilson
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 2.368

7.  Compliance: A barrier to occupational rehabilitation?

Authors:  M K Nicholas
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1995-12

8.  Meta-Analysis of Thirty-Four Independent Samples Studied Using PET Reveals a Significantly Attenuated Central Response to Noxious Stimulation in Clinical Pain Patients.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  1999

Review 9.  Anatomy and pathophysiology of the sacroiliac joint.

Authors:  O Calvillo; I Skaribas; J Turnipseed
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  2000

10.  Prevalence and clinical features of lumbar zygapophysial joint pain: a study in an Australian population with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  A C Schwarzer; S C Wang; N Bogduk; P J McNaught; R Laurent
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 19.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.