Literature DB >> 1531550

Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Attempted meta-analysis of the literature.

J A Turner1, M Ersek, L Herron, R Deyo.   

Abstract

A meta-analysis was undertaken to determine the effects of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis on pain and disability. Seventy-four journal articles met inclusion criteria and were independently reviewed by two readers. On average, 64% of patients treated surgically for lumbar spinal stenosis were reported to have good-to-excellent outcomes. However, there was wide variation across studies in the percentage with good outcomes. Few patient characteristics were found to predict outcome. Major deficits in study design, analysis, and reporting were common, and these precluded firm conclusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1531550     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199201000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  125 in total

1.  Dural lesions in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: incidence, risk factors and effect on outcome.

Authors:  Fredrik Strömqvist; Bo Jönsson; Björn Strömqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Influence of graded facetectomy and laminectomy on spinal biomechanics.

Authors:  T Zander; A Rohlmann; C Klöckner; G Bergmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  The conservative surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly.

Authors:  Robert Gunzburg; Marek Szpalski
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Users' guide to the surgical literature: how to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohit Bhandari; P J Devereaux; Victor Montori; Claudio Cinà; Ved Tandan; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Dynamic changes in the dural sac cross-sectional area on axial loaded MR imaging: is there a difference between degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis?

Authors:  H Ozawa; H Kanno; Y Koizumi; N Morozumi; T Aizawa; T Kusakabe; Y Ishii; E Itoi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  [Biomechanics of interspinous spacers].

Authors:  H-J Wilke; J Drumm; K Häussler; C Mack; A Kettler
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Prediction of long-term clinical outcome in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  B Micankova Adamova; S Vohanka; L Dusek; J Jarkovsky; J Bednarik
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Clinical outcomes of microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jwo-Luen Pao; Wein-Chin Chen; Po-Quang Chen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results.

Authors:  J F Zucherman; K Y Hsu; C A Hartjen; T F Mehalic; D A Implicito; M J Martin; D R Johnson; G A Skidmore; P P Vessa; J W Dwyer; S Puccio; J C Cauthen; R M Ozuna
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Reliability of the clinical examination in the diagnosis of neurogenic versus vascular claudication.

Authors:  Andrew J Haig; Paul Park; Peter K Henke; Karen S J Yamakawa; Christy Tomkins-Lane; Juan Valdivia; Sierra Loar
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 4.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.