Literature DB >> 16533171

Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery -- CAOS.

Enes M Kanlić1, Fabian Delarosa, Miguel Pirela-Cruz.   

Abstract

The use of computer navigation in orthopedic surgery allows for real time intraoperative feedback resulting in higher precision of bone cuts, better alignment of implants and extremities, easier fracture reductions, less radiation and better documentation than what is possible in classical orthopaedic procedures. There is no need for direct and repeated visualization of many anatomical landmarks (classical method) in order to have good intraoperative orientation. Navigation technology depicts anatomy and position of "smart tools" on the screen allowing for high surgical precision (smaller number of outliers from desired goal) and with less soft tissue dissection (minimally invasive surgery - MIS). As a result, there are more happy patients with less pain, faster recovery, better functional outcome and well positioned, long lasting implants. In general, navigation cases are longer on the average 10 to 20 minutes, special training is required and equipment is relatively expensive. CAOS applications in knee and hip joint replacement are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16533171      PMCID: PMC7192684          DOI: 10.17305/bjbms.2006.3202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci        ISSN: 1512-8601            Impact factor:   3.363


  20 in total

1.  The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 Press Fit Condylar posterior cruciate-sacrificing total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  J Mahaluxmivala; M J Bankes; P Nicolai; C H Aldam; P W Allen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 2.  Activities of daily living in non-Western cultures: range of motion requirements for hip and knee joint implants.

Authors:  S J Mulholland; U P Wyss
Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.479

3.  Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial.

Authors:  S K Chauhan; R G Scott; W Breidahl; R J Beaver
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-04

4.  A comparison of the midvastus and paramedian approaches for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  D F Dalury; W A Jiranek
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  T L Petersen; G A Engh
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R L Barrack; T Schrader; A J Bertot; M W Wolfe; L Myers
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Variations of pelvic anteversion in the lying and standing positions: analysis of 24 control subjects and implications for CT measurement of position of a prosthetic cup.

Authors:  T A Eddine; H Migaud; C Chantelot; A Cotten; C Fontaine; A Duquennoy
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.246

8.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  G E Lewinnek; J L Lewis; R Tarr; C L Compere; J R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 9.  Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: the effect of orientation of the acetabular component.

Authors:  R Biedermann; A Tonin; M Krismer; F Rachbauer; G Eibl; B Stöckl
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-06

10.  Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J A Rand; M B Coventry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  5 in total

1.  Influence of multi-angle input of intraoperative fluoroscopic images on the spatial positioning accuracy of the C-arm calibration-based algorithm of a CAOS system.

Authors:  Xiangqian Chen; Yu Wang; Gang Zhu; Weijun Zhang; Gang Zhou; Yubo Fan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Interlaboratory comparison of femur surface reconstruction from CT data compared to reference optical 3D scan.

Authors:  Ehsan Soodmand; Daniel Kluess; Patrick A Varady; Robert Cichon; Michael Schwarze; Dominic Gehweiler; Frank Niemeyer; Dieter Pahr; Matthias Woiczinski
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.819

3.  Robotics-assisted versus conventional manual approaches for total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Peng-Fei Han; Cheng-Long Chen; Zhi-Liang Zhang; Yi-Chen Han; Lei Wei; Peng-Cui Li; Xiao-Chun Wei
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 2.547

4.  Comparison of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing designs in high flexion total knee arthroplasty: using a navigation system.

Authors:  Tae Wan Kim; Shi Hwan Park; Jeung Tak Suh
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2012-02-28

Review 5.  Recent Trends, Technical Concepts and Components of Computer-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Systems: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Jan Kubicek; Filip Tomanec; Martin Cerny; Dominik Vilimek; Martina Kalova; David Oczka
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.