Literature DB >> 9491792

Use of an ex vivo ATP luminescence assay to direct chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer.

C M Kurbacher1, I A Cree, H W Bruckner, U Brenne, J A Kurbacher, K Müller, T Ackermann, T J Gilster, L M Wilhelm, H Engel, P K Mallmann, P E Andreotti.   

Abstract

Chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian carcinoma (ROC) produces response rates of 10-80% depending on the prevalence of platinum resistance. Most patients relapse within 1 year and median progression-free survival (PFS) is generally no more than 6 months. Previous pretherapeutic chemosensitivity assays mostly failed to improve the outcome of patients with ROC. Newly developed ATP assays show promising retrospective correlation with clinical outcome. We report here the first results of ATP assay-directed chemotherapy in patients with ROC. Therapy was selected by the ATP tumor chemosensitivity assay (ATP-TCA) in a prospective open-label pilot trial for ROC. Objective response rate (ORR), PFS and overall survival (OAS) of the first 25 evaluable patients were retrospectively compared with those of 30 others having similar characteristics who were treated empirically within the same period. The actuarial median observation times were 80 weeks for the ATP-TCA group and 83.5 weeks for the control group, respectively. In the control group, a 37% ORR [two complete responses (CR) and nine partial responses (PR)] was followed by a median PFS of 20 weeks and a median OAS of 69 weeks, mainly related to the use of single-agent chemotherapy. The ORR in the ATP-TCA group was 64% (eight CR and eight PR) (p=0.04) with the majority of responses (11 of 16) achieved with novel combinations. The median PFS in this group was 50 weeks (p=0.003) and the median OAS was 97 weeks (p=0.145). Survival of responding patients was similar in both groups. Chemotherapy guided by the ATP-TCA produced a greater benefit with regard to both ORR and PFS in platinum-refractory patients. ATP-TCA-directed chemotherapy for ROC compares favorably with chemotherapy chosen by a clinician and often leads to the choice of novel drug combinations. These promising results now warrant confirmation by prospective randomized trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9491792     DOI: 10.1097/00001813-199801000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Drugs        ISSN: 0959-4973            Impact factor:   2.248


  27 in total

1.  Heterogeneity of chemosensitivity in esophageal cancer using ATP-tumor chemosensitivity assay.

Authors:  Zhi-qiang Ling; Chun-jian Qi; Xiao-xiao Lu; Li-juan Qian; Lin-hui Gu; Zhi-guo Zheng; Qiang Zhao; Shi Wang; Xian-hua Fang; Zhi-xing Yang; Jian Yin; Wei-min Mao
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  Cytotoxicity of the new antimetabolite-bisphosphonate (5-FdU-alendronate) in comparison to standard therapeutics on breast and ovarian cancer cell lines in the ATP tumor chemosensitivity assay.

Authors:  Sarah Schott; Markus Wallwiener; Beate Kootz; Harald Seeger; Tanja Fehm; Hans Neubauer
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  ATP chemosensitivity testing of new antitumor duplex drugs linking 3`-C-ethynylycytidine (ECyd) and 2´-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5-FdU) in comparison to standard cytostatica and combinations thereof.

Authors:  Sarah Schott; Markus Wallwiener; Beate Kootz; Harald Seeger; Tanja Fehm; Hans Neubauer
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  On chip two-photon metabolic imaging for drug toxicity testing.

Authors:  Fang Yu; Shuangmu Zhuo; Yinghua Qu; Deepak Choudhury; Zhiping Wang; Ciprian Iliescu; Hanry Yu
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 2.800

5.  Assay-based response evaluation in head and neck oncology: requirements for better decision making.

Authors:  Andreas Dietz; Andreas Boehm; Iris-Susanne Horn; Pierre Kruber; Ingo Bechmann; Wojciech Golusinski; Dietger Niederwieser; Ralph Dollner; Torsten W Remmerbach; Christian Wittekind; Stephan Dietzsch; Guido Hildebrandt; Gunnar Wichmann
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Individualized tumor response testing for prediction of response to Paclitaxel and Cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jee Hyun Kim; Keun-Wook Lee; Yeul Hong Kim; Kyung Hee Lee; Do Youn Oh; Joonhee Kim; Sung Hyun Yang; Seock-Ah Im; Sung Ho Choi; Yung-Jue Bang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Molecular basis of chemosensitivity of platinum pre-treated ovarian cancer to chemotherapy.

Authors:  S Glaysher; F G Gabriel; P Johnson; M Polak; L A Knight; K Parker; M Poole; A Narayanan; I A Cree
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  The relationships between the chemosensitivity of human gastric cancer to paclitaxel and the expressions of class III β-tubulin, MAPT, and survivin.

Authors:  Wenting He; Dachuan Zhang; Jingting Jiang; Ping Liu; Changping Wu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 3.064

9.  DNA damage induced by cis- and carboplatin as indicator for in vitro sensitivity of ovarian carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Florian T Unger; Hermann A Klasen; Garri Tchartchian; Rudy L de Wilde; Irene Witte
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-10-10       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Resistance gene expression determines the in vitro chemosensitivity of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Authors:  Sharon Glaysher; Dennis Yiannakis; Francis G Gabriel; Penny Johnson; Marta E Polak; Louise A Knight; Zoe Goldthorpe; Katharine Peregrin; Mya Gyi; Paul Modi; Joe Rahamim; Mark E Smith; Khalid Amer; Bruce Addis; Matthew Poole; Ajit Narayanan; Tim J Gulliford; Peter E Andreotti; Ian A Cree
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.