Literature DB >> 20052589

Assay-based response evaluation in head and neck oncology: requirements for better decision making.

Andreas Dietz1, Andreas Boehm, Iris-Susanne Horn, Pierre Kruber, Ingo Bechmann, Wojciech Golusinski, Dietger Niederwieser, Ralph Dollner, Torsten W Remmerbach, Christian Wittekind, Stephan Dietzsch, Guido Hildebrandt, Gunnar Wichmann.   

Abstract

This article gives an overview on different current strategies of assay-based response evaluation in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) and critically summarizes their role and needs for future clinical evaluation. Due to a growing amount of data of phase III clinical trials of multimodality treatment options for HNSCC, treatment planning in regard to optimal outcome is becoming an interdisciplinary challenge. New concepts such as induction chemotherapy with bi- or ternary combinations of chemotherapeutics, integration of targeted therapies, concurrent and sequential chemoradiation concepts, and multimodality-based organ preservation strategies strongly compete with traditional definitive surgical procedures. Moreover, the outcome is difficult to predict due to heterogeneity of a tumor's response, impaired late functional outcome, and increased late toxicity if simultaneously applied to radiation. Retrospectively looking at non-responders with tumors classified as resectable, primary surgery is very likely to have achieved better results, since chemoradiation causes a high degree of early and late toxicities leading to extremely complicated terms and conditions in surgery following current multimodal therapeutic strategies. Unfortunately, predictive information on response characteristics of a given tumor before starting the therapy is not available in daily routine, although heterogeneity in response of a given tumor entity to treatments has been known for decades. Therefore, current therapy strategies for HNSCC still have to ignore this fact, creating an urgent need for the development of proper predictive assays. There are interesting clinical observations showing that response on induction chemotherapy may predict the outcome after radiotherapy. Some trials use this empiric phenomenon to pre-select non-responders for primary surgical treatment avoiding severe salvage complications after failure of complete chemoradiation treatment. Moving one step further, recent literature and our own investigations implicate that response evaluation of the individual patient's HNSCC in a suitable ex vivo assay just before starting the treatment is mature for clinical research. To this end, essential needs and hints are addressed and discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20052589     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-009-1191-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  77 in total

1.  Highly specific prediction of antineoplastic drug resistance with an in vitro assay using suprapharmacologic drug exposures.

Authors:  D H Kern; L M Weisenthal
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1990-04-04       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Chemosensitivity of advanced larynx carcinoma cells in vitro and significance of multidrug resistance markers in these tumors.

Authors:  A S Juvekar; A J Amonkar; A K D'cruz; T Saikaia; S Pradhan
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.099

3.  Combined analysis of HPV-DNA, p16 and EGFR expression to predict prognosis in oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Niklas Reimers; Hans U Kasper; Soenke J Weissenborn; Hartmut Stützer; Simon F Preuss; Thomas K Hoffmann; Ernst Jan M Speel; Hans P Dienes; Herbert J Pfister; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius; Jens P Klussmann
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Development of a miniaturized, improved nucleic acid precursor incorporation assay for chemosensitivity testing of human solid tumors.

Authors:  D H Kern; C R Drogemuller; M C Kennedy; S U Hildebrand-Zanki; N Tanigawa; V K Sondak
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  Tailoring targeted therapy to individual patients: lessons to be learnt from the development of mitomycin C.

Authors:  Milène Volpato; Roger M Phillips
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.069

6.  A uniform residual tumor (R) classification: integration of the R classification and the circumferential margin status.

Authors:  Christian Wittekind; Carolyn Compton; Phil Quirke; Iris Nagtegaal; Susanne Merkel; Paul Hermanek; Leslie H Sobin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Current aspects of targeted therapy in head and neck tumors.

Authors:  Andreas Dietz; Andreas Boehm; Christian Mozet; Gunnar Wichmann; Athanassios Giannis
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Riboflavin-mediated photosensitization of Vinca alkaloids distorts drug sensitivity assays.

Authors:  C Granzow; M Kopun; T Kröber
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1995-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Fibroblast-derived MT1-MMP promotes tumor progression in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Wenyue Zhang; Lynn M Matrisian; Kenn Holmbeck; Catherine C Vick; Eben L Rosenthal
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Ex vivo chemosensitivity testing and gene expression profiling predict response towards adjuvant gemcitabine treatment in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  C W Michalski; M Erkan; D Sauliunaite; T Giese; R Stratmann; C Sartori; N A Giese; H Friess; J Kleeff
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  14 in total

1.  [Multimodal laryngeal preservation: current data-based opinion].

Authors:  A Dietz; A Boehm; G Wichmann; D Niederwieser; S Dietzsch; M Fuchs
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Therapeutic options for treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Kathrin Gessner; Gunnar Wichmann; Andreas Boehm; Anett Reiche; Julia Bertolini; Johannes Brus; Ina Sterker; Stefan Dietzsch; Andreas Dietz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Response evaluation in head and neck oncology.

Authors:  Robert Mandic; Jochen A Werner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  [Pharmacological characterization of head and neck cancer in ex-vivo tests].

Authors:  G Wichmann; A Dietz
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 5.  [Translational research in head and neck cancer. Biological characteristics and general aspects].

Authors:  A Dietz; G Wichmann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 6.  [Current therapy options in recurrent head and neck cancer].

Authors:  A Boehm; G Wichmann; C Mozet; A Dietz
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 7.  [Preclinical models to establish innovative therapy strategies : Ex‑vivo assessment of head and neck tumor chemo- and immune responses].

Authors:  G Wichmann; A Dietz
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 8.  Effects of tumour stage, comorbidity and therapy on survival of laryngeal cancer patients: a systematic review and a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elisabeth Rudolph; Gerhard Dyckhoff; Heiko Becher; Andreas Dietz; Heribert Ramroth
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Surgical options in radiotherapy-failed early glottic cancer.

Authors:  Roberto Santoro; Giuseppe Meccariello; Giuditta Mannelli; Belinda Bini; Fabiola Paiar; Oreste Gallo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Systemic therapy strategies for head-neck carcinomas: Current status.

Authors:  Thomas K Hoffmann
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-12-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.