Literature DB >> 9479751

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in human newborns and adults. I. Frequency effects.

R E Lasky1.   

Abstract

This study varied stimulus frequency and recorded distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) in human newborns and adults. Because of outer and middle ear acoustics, the same auditory input resulted in higher newborn stimulus sound pressure levels across a broad frequency range in the occluded outer ear canal. Noise levels in the canal were 5-15 dB lower for adults at frequencies less than about 3 kHz. The 2 f1-f2 DPOAE was the most reliably recorded DPOAE except at the lowest frequencies assessed. At the lowest frequencies the 2 f2-f1 DPOAE was more frequently recorded than any other DPOAE. There were no striking developmental differences in the kinds of DPOAEs that were recorded. The amplitudes of consecutively recorded 2 f1-f2 DPOAEs were generally within 1.5 dB of each other for all age groups (slightly better reproducibility for adults than newborns). The phases of consecutively recorded 2 f1-f2 DPOAEs were generally within 15 degrees of each other (often less than 10 and 5 degrees for newborns and adults respectively). At the highest frequencies assessed (f2 = 4.2-9.9 kHz) all subjects had similar amplitude 2 f1-f2 DPOAEs. At lower frequencies adult 2 f1-f2 amplitudes were significantly less than those of newborns. At the lowest frequencies reliably assessed (f2 = 1.5-2.1 kHz) term newborns had significantly larger 2 f1-f2 DPOAEs than preterm newborns. Newborn and adult 2 f1-f2 DPOAE amplitude X f2/f1, functions were quite similar although there were reliable differences. Age related differences in the outer and middle ears may explain some of the differences in DPOAEs that were observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9479751     DOI: 10.1121/1.421215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Comparing the optimal signal conditions for recording cubic and quadratic distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Lin Bian; Shixiong Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  [High-resolution distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: method and clinical applications].

Authors:  T Janssen; A Lodwig; J Müller; H Oswald
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Longitudinal Development of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Infants With Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Lisa L Hunter; Chelsea M Blankenship; Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; David K Brown; Annie McCune; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Li Lin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Optimizing Clinical Interpretation of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Infants.

Authors:  Chelsea M Blankenship; Lisa L Hunter; Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; David K Brown; Annie McCune; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Li Lin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Changes in the DP-gram during the preterm and early postnatal period.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sandra I Oba; Rangasamy Ramanathan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus): parameter optimization.

Authors:  M D Valero; E G Pasanen; D McFadden; R Ratnam
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions: A Tool for Hearing Assessment and Scientific Study.

Authors:  Caroline Abdala; Leslie Visser-Dumont
Journal:  Volta Rev       Date:  2001

8.  Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.

Authors:  Jesyin Lai; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.208

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.