Literature DB >> 9477092

Classification of regional lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma. German Gastric Cancer Study Group.

J D Roder1, K Böttcher, R Busch, C Wittekind, P Hermanek, J R Siewert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Classification of lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma was based on the localization (International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer [UICC/AJCC] 1992). The authors analyzed the data of the German Gastric Cancer Study (GGCS) to determine whether the number of involved lymph nodes related to the prognosis independent of their anatomic localization (UICC/AJCC 1997).
METHODS: For 477 patients of the GGCS resected for cure (UICC/AJCC R0 resection) who had involved regional lymph nodes and no evidence of distant metastases, the 1992 UICC/AJCC classification was compared with the new UICC/AJCC classification (1997) based on the number of involved lymph nodes (ILN).
RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-eight patients (54.1%) had 1-6 ILN, 137 patients (28.7%) had 7-15, and 82 patients (17.2%) had more than 15. When the 1992 and 1997 UICC/AJCC classifications were compared, the prognosis of patients classified as pN1 (n = 187) in the 1992 pN classification was homogeneous, whereas there was a marked lack of homogeneity among the patients classified as pN2 (n = 290). For 103 of 290 patients with 1-6 ILN, the prognosis appeared to be more favorable (5-year survival rate, 45.5%), whereas 137 of 290 patients with 7-15 ILN had an intermediate prognosis (5-year survival rate, 29.7%). Eighty-two of 290 patients had a dismal prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate of 10.4%. There was a highly significant difference in survival (P < 0.0001). Within the groups with 1-6, 7-15, and more than 15 ILN, the localization of ILN did not significantly alter the prognosis.
CONCLUSIONS: The UICC/AJCC classification based on the number of involved regional lymph nodes allows for an estimation of prognosis superior to the 1992 classification. In addition, the new classification can now be applied without methodologic problems and seems more reproducible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9477092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  34 in total

1.  Lymph node staging in gastric cancer: is location more important than Number? An analysis of 1,038 patients.

Authors:  M S Karpeh; L Leon; D Klimstra; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Prognostic impact of metastatic lymph node ratio on gastric cancer after curative distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Chang-Ming Huang; Jian-Xian Lin; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Bi-Juan Lin; Jia-Bin Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Pre-operative lymph node status of gastric cancer evaluated by multidetector computed tomography.

Authors:  Min Wang; Yanwei Ye; Qing Yang; Jingjing Li; Chao Han; Wei Wang; Chunlin Zhao; Jianguo Wen
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

4.  Prognostic impact of metastatic lymph node ratio in advanced gastric cancer from cardia and fundus.

Authors:  Chang-Ming Huang; Bi-Juan Lin; Hui-Shan Lu; Xiang-Fu Zhang; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Usefulness of the log odds of positive lymph nodes to predict and discriminate prognosis in gastric carcinomas.

Authors:  A Calero; J Escrig-Sos; F Mingol; A Arroyo; D Martinez-Ramos; M de Juan; J L Salvador-Sanchis; E Garcia-Granero; R Calpena; F J Lacueva
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Extranodal Extension of Nodal Metastases Is a Poor Prognostic Indicator in Gastric Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicola Veronese; Matteo Fassan; Laura D Wood; Brendon Stubbs; Marco Solmi; Paola Capelli; Antonio Pea; Alessia Nottegar; Giuseppe Sergi; Enzo Manzato; Sara Carraro; Marco Maruzzo; Ivana Cataldo; Fabio Bagante; Mattia Barbareschi; Liang Cheng; Maria Bencivenga; Giovanni de Manzoni; Claudio Luchini
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  The efficacy of gastrectomy for large gastric cancer.

Authors:  Osamu Kobayashi; Akira Tsuburaya; Takaki Yoshikawa; Tomohiko Osaragi; Hitoshi Murakami; Tatsuya Yoshida; Motonori Sairenji
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer: ten-year results of the German Gastric Cancer Study.

Authors:  J R Siewert; K Böttcher; H J Stein; J D Roder
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Metastatic lymph node in gastric cancer; is it a real distant metastasis?

Authors:  Do Hyoung Lim; Hyeong Su Kim; Young Suk Park; Jeeyun Lee; Se Hoon Park; Ho Yeong Lim; Sang Hoon Ji; Min Jae Park; Seong Yoon Yi; Ji Yeong An; Tae Sung Sohn; Jae Hyoung Noh; Jae Moon Bae; Sung Kim; Cheol Keun Park; Won Ki Kang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Gastric carcinoma in China: Current status and future perspectives (Review).

Authors:  Xiaodong Zhu; Jin Li
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.