M S Karpeh1, L Leon, D Klimstra, M F Brennan. 1. Departments of Surgery, Biostatistics, and Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the impact of staging systems on the survival of 1,038 patients with gastric cancer undergoing resection for cure in a North American center. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: In 1997, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer redefined N stage in gastric cancer. The number of involved nodes rather than their location defines N, and a minimum of 15 examined lymph nodes is recommended for adequate staging. In the 1988 AJCC N-staging system, N1 and N2 node metastases were defined as within 3 cm or more than 3 cm of the primary; the 1997 AJCC N stages were defined as N1 = 1 to 6 positive nodes, N2 = 7 to 15 positive nodes, and N3 = more than 15 positive nodes. METHODS: Between 1985 and 1999, 1,038 patients underwent an R0 resection. Median and 5-year survival rates were compared and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate median survival. RESULTS: The location of positive nodes did not significantly affect median survival when analyzed by the number of positive nodes. In contrast, the number of positive lymph nodes had a profound influence on survival. The new N categories served as a better discriminator of median survival when 15 or more nodes were examined. Survival estimates for stages II, IIIA, and IIIB were significantly influenced by examining 15 or more nodes. CONCLUSION: The number of positive nodes best defines the prognostic influence of metastatic lymph nodes in gastric cancer. Survival estimates based on the number of involved nodes are better represented when at least 15 nodes are examined.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the impact of staging systems on the survival of 1,038 patients with gastric cancer undergoing resection for cure in a North American center. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: In 1997, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer redefined N stage in gastric cancer. The number of involved nodes rather than their location defines N, and a minimum of 15 examined lymph nodes is recommended for adequate staging. In the 1988 AJCC N-staging system, N1 and N2 node metastases were defined as within 3 cm or more than 3 cm of the primary; the 1997 AJCC N stages were defined as N1 = 1 to 6 positive nodes, N2 = 7 to 15 positive nodes, and N3 = more than 15 positive nodes. METHODS: Between 1985 and 1999, 1,038 patients underwent an R0 resection. Median and 5-year survival rates were compared and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate median survival. RESULTS: The location of positive nodes did not significantly affect median survival when analyzed by the number of positive nodes. In contrast, the number of positive lymph nodes had a profound influence on survival. The new N categories served as a better discriminator of median survival when 15 or more nodes were examined. Survival estimates for stages II, IIIA, and IIIB were significantly influenced by examining 15 or more nodes. CONCLUSION: The number of positive nodes best defines the prognostic influence of metastatic lymph nodes in gastric cancer. Survival estimates based on the number of involved nodes are better represented when at least 15 nodes are examined.
Authors: K Fujii; H Isozaki; K Okajima; E Nomura; M Niki; S Sako; N Izumi; H Mabuchi; K Nishiguchi; N Tanigawa Journal: Br J Surg Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: A M Bunt; J Hermans; C J van de Velde; M Sasako; F A Hoefsloot; G Fleuren; J A Bruijn Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1996-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Y Kodera; Y Yamamura; Y Shimizu; A Torii; T Hirai; K Yasui; T Morimoto; T Kato; T Kito Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Johan L Dikken; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Daniel G Coit; Manish A Shah; Marcel Verheij; Annemieke Cats Journal: Therap Adv Gastroenterol Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 4.409
Authors: Johan L Dikken; Johanna W van Sandick; H A Maurits Swellengrebel; Pehr A Lind; Hein Putter; Edwin P M Jansen; Henk Boot; Nicole C T van Grieken; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Marcel Verheij; Annemieke Cats Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2011-08-02 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Andreas Andreou; Sebastian Knitter; Sascha Chopra; Christian Denecke; Moritz Schmelzle; Benjamin Struecker; Ann-Christin Heilmann; Johanna Spenke; Tobias Hofmann; Peter C Thuss-Patience; Marcus Bahra; Johann Pratschke; Matthias Biebl Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2018-10-03 Impact factor: 3.452