Literature DB >> 9790335

Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer: ten-year results of the German Gastric Cancer Study.

J R Siewert1, K Böttcher, H J Stein, J D Roder.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In 1986 a prospective multicenter observation trial in patients with resected gastric cancer was initiated in Germany. An analysis of prognostic factors based on the 10-year survival data is now presented. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1654 patients treated for gastric cancer between 1986 and 1989 at 19 centers in Germany and Austria were included. The resected specimen were evaluated histopathologically according to a standardized protocol. The extent of lymphadenectomy was classified after surgery based on the number of removed lymph nodes on histopathologic assessment (25 or fewer removed nodes, D1 or standard lymphadenectomy; >25 removed nodes, D2 or extended lymphadenectomy). Endpoint of the study was death. Follow-up is complete for 97% of the included patients (median follow-up of the surviving patients is 8.4 years). Prognostic factors were assessed by multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: A complete macroscopic and microscopic tumor resection (R0 resection according to the UICC 1997) could be achieved in 1182 of the 1654 patients (71.5%). The calculated 10-year survival rate in the entire patient population was 26.3% +/- 4.7%; it was 36.1% +/- 1.6% after an R0 resection. In the total patient population there was an independent prognostic effect of the ratio between invaded and removed lymph nodes, the residual tumor (R) category, the pT category, the presence of postsurgical complications, and the presence of distant metastases. Multivariate analysis in the subgroup of patients who had a UICC R0 resection confirmed the nodal status, the pT category, and the presence of postsurgical complications as the major independent prognostic factors. The extent of lymph node dissection had a significant and independent effect on the 10-year survival rate in patients with stage II tumors. This effect was present in the subgroups with (pT2N1) and without (pT3N0) lymph node metastases on standard histopathologic assessment. The beneficial effect of extended lymph node dissection for stage II tumors persisted when patients with insufficient lymph node dissection (<15 nodes) were excluded from the analysis. There was no difference in the postsurgical morbidity and mortality rates between patients with standard and extended lymph node dissection.
CONCLUSIONS: Lymph node ratio and lymph node status are the most important prognostic factors in patients with resected gastric cancer. In experienced centers, extended lymph node dissection does not increase the mortality or morbidity rate of resection for gastric cancer but markedly improves long-term survival in patients with stage II tumors. This effect appears to be independent of the phenomenon of stage migration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9790335      PMCID: PMC1191515          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199810000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  27 in total

1.  [Prognostic factors in stomach cancer. Results of a uni- and multivariate analysis].

Authors:  K Böttcher; K Becker; R Busch; J D Roder; J R Siewert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Lymph node metastases of gastric cancer. General pattern in 1931 patients.

Authors:  K Maruyama; P Gunvén; K Okabayashi; M Sasako; T Kinoshita
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Quantitative analysis of nodal involvement with respect to survival rate after curative gastrectomy for carcinoma.

Authors:  T Okusa; Y Nakane; T Boku; H Takada; M Yamamura; K Hioki; M Yamamoto
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1990-06

4.  Results of gastric resection for carcinoma of the stomach: the European experience.

Authors:  G Heberer; R K Teichmann; H J Krämling; B Günther
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Is the prognosis for Japanese and German patients with gastric cancer really different?

Authors:  E Bollschweiler; K Boettcher; A H Hoelscher; M Sasako; T Kinoshita; K Maruyama; J R Siewert
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Prognostic relevance of systematic lymph node dissection in gastric carcinoma. German Gastric Carcinoma Study Group.

Authors:  J R Siewert; K Böttcher; J D Roder; R Busch; P Hermanek; H J Meyer
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Gastric cancer: a 25-year review.

Authors:  W H Allum; D J Powell; C C McConkey; J W Fielding
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Cancer of the stomach. A patient care study by the American College of Surgeons.

Authors:  H J Wanebo; B J Kennedy; J Chmiel; G Steele; D Winchester; R Osteen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Lymphadenectomy in gastric carcinoma. A prospective and prognostic study.

Authors:  J Jaehne; H J Meyer; H Maschek; H Geerlings; E Burns; R Pichlmayr
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1992-03

10.  Lymph node counts in the upper abdomen: anatomical basis for lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer.

Authors:  P K Wagner; A Ramaswamy; J Rüschoff; P Schmitz-Moormann; M Rothmund
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  296 in total

1.  Prognostic factors in gastric cancer.

Authors:  F Pacelli; G B Doglietto; P Caprino
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer.

Authors:  D H Roukos
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Minimally invasive total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a pilot series.

Authors:  Evelyn L Kachikwu; Vijay Trisal; Joseph Kim; Alessio Pigazzi; Joshua D I Ellenhorn
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  [Not Available].

Authors:  K Homayounfar; H Becker
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Prospective, comparative study for the evaluation of lymph node involvement in gastric cancer: Maruyama computer program versus sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Authors:  Dezső Tóth; Miklós Török; Zsolt Kincses; László Damjanovich
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 6.  Updating controversies on the multidisciplinary management of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Javier Lacueva; Javier Gallego; Juan Antonio Díaz-González
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of signet ring cell carcinoma of the stomach.

Authors:  Kyoung-Joo Kwon; Ki-Nam Shim; Eun-Mi Song; Ju-Young Choi; Seong-Eun Kim; Hye-Kyung Jung; Sung-Ae Jung
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 7.370

8.  Results of specialization in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer in Peru.

Authors:  Michel Portanova; Fernando Vargas; Emilio Lombardi; Victor Mena; Ramiro Carbajal; Nestor Palacios; Jorge Orrego
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 9.  Carcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction in Chinese patients.

Authors:  Qin Huang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Alterations in p53 predict response to preoperative high dose chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  F Bataille; P Rümmele; W Dietmaier; D Gaag; F Klebl; A Reichle; P Wild; F Hofstädter; A Hartmann
Journal:  Mol Pathol       Date:  2003-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.