Literature DB >> 19293297

A theory-based approach to understanding follow-up of abnormal Pap tests.

Carmen Radecki Breitkopf1, Heidi C Pearson.   

Abstract

We applied a general theoretical framework to understand intentions to attend recommended follow-up for abnormal Pap results. Participants were 338 women attending university-affiliated clinics. Intention was associated with favorable attitudes toward follow-up (OR = 5.3); perceiving attending follow-up as consistent with one's self-concept (OR = 3.0); self-efficacy (OR = 1.8); and believing one would be told exactly what is wrong (OR = 1.3). Intention was negatively associated with believing the problem could be avoided by not returning for follow-up (OR = 0.75). Beliefs, affect and attitudes differed by race and ethnicity (all p < .05). Attendance at follow-up was related to attitude and self-concept (both p < .05). Results have implications for theory development and patient education.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19293297      PMCID: PMC2658744          DOI: 10.1177/1359105308101674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Psychol        ISSN: 1359-1053


  28 in total

1.  Hispanic adults' beliefs, attitudes, and intentions regarding the female condom.

Authors:  L M Bogart; H Cecil; S D Pinkerton
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2000-04

2.  Inadequate follow-up for abnormal Pap smears in an urban population.

Authors:  Neeraja B Peterson; Jini Han; Karen M Freund
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Adherence to recommendations for follow-up to abnormal Pap tests.

Authors:  Katherine S Eggleston; Ann L Coker; Kathryn J Luchok; Tamra E Meyer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Screening for squamous cervical cancer: duration of low risk after negative results of cervical cytology and its implication for screening policies. IARC Working Group on evaluation of cervical cancer screening programmes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-09-13

Review 5.  Methodological issues in adherence to cancer control regimens.

Authors:  E R Gritz; M R DiMatteo; R D Hays
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Cervical cancer mortality trends in Australia--an update.

Authors:  C D Holman; B K Armstrong
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1987-04-20       Impact factor: 7.738

7.  Noncompliance in screening follow-up among family planning clinic patients with cervical dysplasia.

Authors:  R Michielutte; R A Diseker; L D Young; W J May
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Persistent area socioeconomic disparities in U.S. incidence of cervical cancer, mortality, stage, and survival, 1975-2000.

Authors:  Gopal K Singh; Barry A Miller; Benjamin F Hankey; Brenda K Edwards
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Meta-analysis of social inequality and the risk of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Seema Parikh; Paul Brennan; Paolo Boffetta
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2003-07-10       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Adverse psychologic consequences of positive cytologic cervical screening.

Authors:  C Lerman; S M Miller; R Scarborough; P Hanjani; S Nolte; D Smith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  4 in total

1.  Predictors of adherence to follow-up recommendations after an abnormal Pap smear among underserved inner-city women.

Authors:  Suzanne M Miller; Erin K Tagai; Kuang-Yi Wen; Minsun Lee; Siu-Kuen Azor Hui; Deirdre Kurtz; John Scarpato; Enrique Hernandez
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2017-01-31

2.  Passive smoke exposure and abnormal cervical cytology in a predominantly Hispanic population.

Authors:  Kristy K Ward; Abbey B Berenson; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Intervention to improve follow-up for abnormal Papanicolaou tests: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Lauren Dawson; James J Grady; Daniel M Breitkopf; Carolyn Nelson-Becker; Russell R Snyder
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  The role of family history of cancer on cervical cancer screening behavior in a population-based survey of women in the Southeastern United States.

Authors:  Jessica D Bellinger; Heather M Brandt; James W Hardin; Shalanda A Bynum; Patricia A Sharpe; Dawnyéa Jackson
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2013-05-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.