Literature DB >> 9460945

Synthetic porous ceramic compared with autograft in scoliosis surgery. A prospective, randomized study of 341 patients.

A O Ransford1, T Morley, M A Edgar, P Webb, N Passuti, D Chopin, C Morin, F Michel, C Garin, D Pries.   

Abstract

We have evaluated the use of a synthetic porous ceramic (Triosite) as a substitute for bone graft in posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. In a prospective, randomised study 341 patients at five hospitals in the UK and France were randomly allocated either to autograft from the iliac crest or rib segments (171) or to receive Triosite blocks (170). All patients were assessed after operation and at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months. The two groups were similar with regard to all demographic and baseline variables, but the 184 treated in France (54%) had Cotrel-Dubouset instrumentation and the 157 treated in the UK usually had Harrington-Luque implants. In the Triosite group the average Cobb angle of the upper curve was 56 degrees, corrected to 24 degrees (57%). At 18 months, the average was 26 degrees (3% loss). In the autograft group the average preoperative upper curve of 53 degrees was corrected to 21 degrees (60%). At 18 months the mean curve was 25 degrees (8% loss). Pain levels after operation were similar in the two groups, being mild in most cases. In the Triosite group only three patients had problems of wound healing, but in the autograft group, 14 patients had delayed healing, infection or haematoma in the spinal wound. In addition, 15 autograft patients had pain at the donor site at three months. Seven had infections, two had haematoma and four had delayed healing. The haematological and serum biochemistry results showed no abnormal trends and no significant differences between the groups. There were no adverse events related to the graft material and no evidence of allergenicity. Our results suggest that Triosite synthetic porous ceramic is a safe and effective substitute for autograft in these patients. Histological findings on biopsy indicate that Triosite provides a favourable scaffolding for the formation of new bone and is gradually incorporated into the fusion mass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9460945     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b1.7276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  30 in total

1.  Development of a per-operative procedure for concentrated bone marrow adjunction in postero-lateral lumbar fusion: radiological, biological and clinical assessment.

Authors:  G A Odri; A Hami; V Pomero; M Seite; D Heymann; A Bertrand-Vasseur; W Skalli; J Delecrin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  [Bone substitutes in scoliosis surgery].

Authors:  T Lerner; H Griefingholt; U Liljenqvist
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  An update on bone substitutes for spinal fusion.

Authors:  Masashi Miyazaki; Hiroshi Tsumura; Jeffrey C Wang; Ahmet Alanay
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  2011 AOA Symposium: Tissue Engineering and Tissue Regeneration: AOA critical issues.

Authors:  Scott A Rodeo; Scott D Boden; Martha M Murray; Thomas A Einhorn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 5.  Bone graft substitutes for spine fusion: A brief review.

Authors:  Ashim Gupta; Nitin Kukkar; Kevin Sharif; Benjamin J Main; Christine E Albers; Saadiq F El-Amin Iii
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-07-18

Review 6.  A systematic review of comparative studies on bone graft alternatives for common spine fusion procedures.

Authors:  Charla R Fischer; Ryan Cassilly; Winifred Cantor; Emmanuel Edusei; Qusai Hammouri; Thomas Errico
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Electrospun hydroxyapatite-containing chitosan nanofibers crosslinked with genipin for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Michael E Frohbergh; Anna Katsman; Gregory P Botta; Phillip Lazarovici; Caroline L Schauer; Ulrike G K Wegst; Peter I Lelkes
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Periodontal regeneration in experimentally-induced alveolar bone dehiscence by an improved porous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic in beagle dogs.

Authors:  Han Shi; Jia Ma; Ning Zhao; Yangxi Chen; Yunmao Liao
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  A level-1 pilot study to evaluate of ultraporous beta-tricalcium phosphate as a graft extender in the posterior correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Thomas Lerner; Viola Bullmann; Tobias L Schulte; Marc Schneider; Ulf Liljenqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Impaction bone grafting of the acetabulum at hip revision using a mix of bone chips and a biphasic porous ceramic bone graft substitute.

Authors:  Ashley W Blom; Vikki Wylde; Christine Livesey; Michael R Whitehouse; Steve Eastaugh-Waring; Gordon C Bannister; Ian D Learmonth
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.