Literature DB >> 22639299

Development of a per-operative procedure for concentrated bone marrow adjunction in postero-lateral lumbar fusion: radiological, biological and clinical assessment.

G A Odri1, A Hami, V Pomero, M Seite, D Heymann, A Bertrand-Vasseur, W Skalli, J Delecrin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Addition of bone marrow to the bone graft in the postero-lateral lumbar arthrodesis is a widely used technique. Bone marrow brings stem cells and growth factors contained in the platelets, favorable for bone growth. Adjunction of concentrated bone marrow should create better conditions and may increase bone growth.
METHODS: Simple blind randomized clinical, prospective, monocentric trial was conducted. Fifteen patients underwent lumbar arthrodesis. During surgery, a fraction of the bone marrow harvested was centrifuged. One side received this concentrate with autologous bone and ceramics; the other side received the same graft with unconcentrated bone marrow. A quantitative study, realised with a volume calculating software on CT-scan images, determined the cortical bone volume in the graft post-operatively and at 3 months. The osteoprogenitor cells, nucleated cells and platelet concentrations were determined.
RESULTS: The biological study found an average concentration of six times for the nucleated cells, 3.5 times for the platelets and 2.2 times for the osteoprogenitor cells. The comparison of the mean cortical bone volumes post-operatively and at 3 months was not significantly different.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the concentration obtained, there was no increase of bone growth by adding concentrated bone marrow. However, the number of stem cells in bone marrow was low and maybe a stronger concentration is needed to obtain a difference. The 3D reconstruction of the graft and the analysis of the graft's volume using a novel software was efficient according to the similarity of the graft's volume post-operatively in all patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22639299      PMCID: PMC3508230          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2375-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  36 in total

1.  Correlation of radiologic assessment of lumbar spine fusions with surgical exploration.

Authors:  A E Brodsky; E S Kovalsky; M A Khalil
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Interobserver variability in grading lumbar fusions.

Authors:  C L Hamill; E D Simmons
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1997-10

3.  Synthetic porous ceramic compared with autograft in scoliosis surgery. A prospective, randomized study of 341 patients.

Authors:  A O Ransford; T Morley; M A Edgar; P Webb; N Passuti; D Chopin; C Morin; F Michel; C Garin; D Pries
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-01

4.  Characterization of cells with osteogenic potential from human marrow.

Authors:  S E Haynesworth; J Goshima; V M Goldberg; A I Caplan
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Involvement of platelets in stimulating osteogenic activity.

Authors:  M Slater; J Patava; K Kingham; R S Mason
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Can lumbar spine radiographs accurately determine fusion in postoperative patients? Correlation of routine radiographs with a second surgical look at lumbar fusions.

Authors:  S L Blumenthal; K Gill
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Aspiration to obtain osteoblast progenitor cells from human bone marrow: the influence of aspiration volume.

Authors:  G F Muschler; C Boehm; K Easley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Morbidity at bone graft donor sites.

Authors:  E M Younger; M W Chapman
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Evaluation of lumbar spine fusion. Plain radiographs versus direct surgical exploration and observation.

Authors:  A P Kant; W J Daum; S M Dean; T Uchida
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  A prospective analysis of autograft versus allograft in posterolateral lumbar fusion in the same patient. A minimum of 1-year follow-up in 144 patients.

Authors:  S S Jorgenson; T G Lowe; J France; J Sabin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  5 in total

1.  Bone graft materials for posterolateral fusion made simple: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthew T Morris; Sandip P Tarpada; Woojin Cho
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Mesenchymal Stem Cells for the Treatment of Spinal Arthrodesis: From Preclinical Research to Clinical Scenario.

Authors:  F Salamanna; M Sartori; G Barbanti Brodano; C Griffoni; L Martini; S Boriani; M Fini
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 5.443

3.  Bone Marrow Aspirate in Spine Surgery: Case Series and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Thomas Noh; Hesham Zakaria; Lara Massie; Christian T Ogasawara; Gunnar A Lee; Mokbel Chedid
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-12-09

4.  Use of Autologous Stem Cells in Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review of Current Clinical Evidence.

Authors:  Zorica Buser; Patrick Hsieh; Hans-Joerg Meisel; Andrea C Skelly; Erika D Brodt; Darrel S Brodke; Jong-Beom Park; S Tim Yoon; Jeffrey Wang
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-11-18

Review 5.  Mesenchymal stromal cell and bone marrow concentrate therapies for musculoskeletal indications: a concise review of current literature.

Authors:  Christian Eder; Katharina Schmidt-Bleek; Sven Geissler; F Andrea Sass; Tazio Maleitzke; Matthias Pumberger; Carsten Perka; Georg N Duda; Tobias Winkler
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.742

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.