Literature DB >> 12648427

Principles and advantages of robotics in urologic surgery.

Antonio Renda1, Guy Vallancien.   

Abstract

Although the available minimally invasive surgical techniques (ie, laparoscopy) have clear advantages, these procedures continue to cause problems for patients. Surgical tools are limited by set axes of movement, restricting the degree of freedom available to the surgeon. In addition, depth perception is lost with the use of two-dimensional viewing systems. As surgeons view a "virtual" target on a television screen, they are hampered by decreased sensory input and a concurrent loss of dexterity. The development of robotic assistance systems in recent years could be the key to overcoming these difficulties. Using robotic systems, surgeons can experience a more natural and ergonomic surgical "feel." Surgical assistance, dexterity and precision enhancement, systems networking, and image-guided therapy are among the benefits offered by surgical robots. In return, the surgeon gains a shorter learning curve, reduced fatigue, and the opportunity to perform complex procedures that would be difficult using conventional laparoscopy. With the development of image-guided technology, robotic systems will become useful tools for surgical training and simulation. Remote surgery is not a routine procedure, but several teams are working on this and experiencing good results. However, economic concerns are the major drawbacks of these systems; before remote surgery becomes routinely feasible, the clinical benefits must be balanced with high investment and running costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12648427     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-003-0037-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   2.862


  23 in total

1.  A review of robotics in surgery.

Authors:  B Davies
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.617

2.  [Planning and simulation of minimally-invasive robotic heart surgery].

Authors:  Eve Coste-Manière; Louaï Adhami; Renault Severac-Bastide; Jean-Daniel Boissonnat; Alain Carpentier
Journal:  C R Biol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.583

3.  Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  Mani Menon; Alok Shrivastava; Ashutosh Tewari; Richard Sarle; Ashok Hemal; James O Peabody; Guy Vallancien
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  The development of a surgeon robot for prostatectomies.

Authors:  B L Davies; R D Hibberd; W S Ng; A G Timoney; J E Wickham
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.617

5.  Telemedicine and surgical robotics: urologic applications.

Authors:  B R Lee; J A Cadeddu; D Stoianovici; L R Kavoussi
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  1999

6.  Computer-enhanced "robotic" cardiac surgery: experience in 148 patients.

Authors:  F W Mohr; V Falk; A Diegeler; T Walther; J F Gummert; J Bucerius; S Jacobs; R Autschbach
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Robot assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Authors:  B Guillonneau; C Jayet; A Tewari; G Vallancien
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study in men.

Authors:  G Pasticier; J B Rietbergen; B Guillonneau; G Fromont; M Menon; G Vallancien
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  The effect of robotic assistance on learning curves for basic laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  Sunil M Prasad; Hersh S Maniar; Nathaniel J Soper; Ralph J Damiano; Mary E Klingensmith
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Comparison of robotic versus human laparoscopic camera control .

Authors:  L R Kavoussi; R G Moore; J B Adams; A W Partin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  2 in total

1.  Lowering gastrointestinal leak rates: a comparative analysis of robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass.

Authors:  Brad E Snyder; Todd Wilson; Terry Scarborough; Sherman Yu; Erik B Wilson
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-09-02

2.  Ergonomics, user comfort, and performance in standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  R H van der Schatte Olivier; C D P Van't Hullenaar; J P Ruurda; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.584

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.