Literature DB >> 9438823

A computational fluid dynamic study of hawkmoth hovering

.   

Abstract

A computational fluid dynamic (CFD) modelling approach is used to study the unsteady aerodynamics of the flapping wing of a hovering hawkmoth. We use the geometry of a Manduca sexta-based robotic wing to define the shape of a three-dimensional 'virtual' wing model and 'hover' this wing, mimicking accurately the three-dimensional movements of the wing of a hovering hawkmoth. Our CFD analysis has established an overall understanding of the viscous and unsteady flow around the flapping wing and of the time course of instantaneous force production, which reveals that hovering flight is dominated by the unsteady aerodynamics of both the instantaneous dynamics and also the past history of the wing. <P> A coherent leading-edge vortex with axial flow was detected during translational motions of both the up- and downstrokes. The attached leading-edge vortex causes a negative pressure region and, hence, is responsible for enhancing lift production. The axial flow, which is derived from the spanwise pressure gradient, stabilises the vortex and gives it a characteristic spiral conical shape. <P> The leading-edge vortex created during previous translational motion remains attached during the rotational motions of pronation and supination. This vortex, however, is substantially deformed due to coupling between the translational and rotational motions, develops into a complex structure, and is eventually shed before the subsequent translational motion. <P> Estimation of the forces during one complete flapping cycle shows that lift is produced mainly during the downstroke and the latter half of the upstroke, with little force generated during pronation and supination. The stroke plane angle that satisfies the horizontal force balance of hovering is 23.6 degrees , which shows excellent agreement with observed angles of approximately 20-25 degrees . The time-averaged vertical force is 40 % greater than that needed to support the weight of the hawkmoth.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 9438823     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.201.4.461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  22 in total

Review 1.  Neuromuscular control: introduction and overview.

Authors:  J L van Leeuwen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  The mechanisms of lift enhancement in insect flight.

Authors:  Fritz-Olaf Lehmann
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2004-03-04

3.  Photogrammetric reconstruction of high-resolution surface topographies and deformable wing kinematics of tethered locusts and free-flying hoverflies.

Authors:  Simon M Walker; Adrian L R Thomas; Graham K Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Beyond robins: aerodynamic analyses of animal flight.

Authors:  Anders Hedenström; Geoffrey Spedding
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Aerodynamic performance of a hovering hawkmoth with flexible wings: a computational approach.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Nakata; Hao Liu
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  The power-speed relationship is U-shaped in two free-flying hawkmoths (Manducasexta).

Authors:  Kajsa Warfvinge; Marco KleinHeerenbrink; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Co-option of a motor-to-sensory histaminergic circuit correlates with insect flight biomechanics.

Authors:  Phillip D Chapman; Samual P Bradley; Erica J Haught; Kassandra E Riggs; Mouaz M Haffar; Kevin C Daly; Andrew M Dacks
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Biomechanics: The aerodynamics buzz from mosquitoes.

Authors:  Laura A Miller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The fish tail motion forms an attached leading edge vortex.

Authors:  Iman Borazjani; Mohsen Daghooghi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  The aerodynamic forces and pressure distribution of a revolving pigeon wing.

Authors:  James R Usherwood
Journal:  Exp Fluids       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.480

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.