Literature DB >> 9434301

Dedicated PET scanners for breast imaging.

R Freifelder1, J S Karp.   

Abstract

We have used computer simulations to compare two designs for a PET scanner dedicated to breast imaging with a whole-body PET scanner. The new designs combine high spatial resolution, high sensitivity, and good energy resolution to detect small, low-contrast masses. The detectors are position sensitive NaI(Tl) scintillators. The first design is a ring scanner surrounding the breast and the second consists of two planar detectors placed on opposite sides of the breast. We have employed standard performance measures to compare the different designs: contrast, percentage standard deviation of the background, and signal-to-noise ratios of reconstructed images. The results of the simulations show that both of the proposed designs have better lesion detectability than a whole-body scanner. The results also show that contrast is higher in the ring breast system but that the noise is lower in the planar breast system. Overall, the ring system yields images with the best signal-to-noise ratios, although the planar system offers practical advantages for imaging the breast and axilla.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9434301     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/42/12/012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  15 in total

1.  A generalized reconstruction framework for unconventional PET systems.

Authors:  Aswin John Mathews; Ke Li; Sergey Komarov; Qiang Wang; Bosky Ravindranath; Joseph A O'Sullivan; Yuan-Chuan Tai
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Use of Breast-Specific PET Scanners and Comparison with MR Imaging.

Authors:  Deepa Narayanan; Wendie A Berg
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.266

3.  Molecular Imaging in Breast Cancer - Potential Future Aspects.

Authors:  Katja Pinker; Wolfgang Bogner; Stephan Gruber; Peter Brader; Siegfried Trattnig; Georgios Karanikas; Thomas H Helbich
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Optical mammography: Diffuse optical imaging of breast cancer.

Authors:  Kijoon Lee
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-10

Review 5.  Nuclear imaging of the breast: translating achievements in instrumentation into clinical use.

Authors:  Carrie B Hruska; Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Analog signal multiplexing for PSAPD-based PET detectors: simulation and experimental validation.

Authors:  Frances W Y Lau; Arne Vandenbroucke; Paul D Reynolds; Peter D Olcott; Mark A Horowitz; Craig S Levin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Design study of a high-resolution breast-dedicated PET system built from cadmium zinc telluride detectors.

Authors:  Hao Peng; Craig S Levin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Fourier rebinning and consistency equations for time-of-flight PET planograms.

Authors:  Yusheng Li; Michel Defrise; Samuel Matej; Scott D Metzler
Journal:  Inverse Probl       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.407

Review 9.  Advantages and limitations of FDG PET in the follow-up of breast cancer.

Authors:  Peter Lind; Isabel Igerc; Thomas Beyer; Peter Reinprecht; Klaus Hausegger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Comparison of diffuse optical tomography of human breast with whole-body and breast-only positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Soren D Konecky; Regine Choe; Alper Corlu; Kijoon Lee; Rony Wiener; Shyam M Srinivas; Janet R Saffer; Richard Freifelder; Joel S Karp; Nassim Hajjioui; Fred Azar; Arjun G Yodh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.