Literature DB >> 9430762

Role of fundamental frequency differences in the perceptual separation of competing vowel sounds by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss.

K H Arehart1, C A King, K S McLean-Mudgett.   

Abstract

This study compared the ability of listeners with normal hearing and listeners with moderate to moderately-severe sensorineural hearing loss to use fundamental frequency differences (delta F0) in the identification of monotically presented simultaneous vowels. Two psychophysical procedures, double vowel identification and masked vowel identification, were used to measure identification performance as a function of delta F0 (0 through 8 semitones) between simultaneous vowels. Performance in the double vowel identification task was measured by the percentage of trials in which listeners correctly identified both vowels in a double vowel. The masked vowel identification task yielded thresholds representing signal-to-noise ratios at which listeners could just identify target vowels in the presence of a masking vowel. In the double vowel identification task, both listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss showed significant delta F0 benefit: Between 0 and 2 semitones, listeners with normal hearing showed an 18.5% average increase in performance; listeners with hearing loss showed a 16.5% average increase. In the masked vowel identification task, both groups showed significant delta F0 benefit. However, the mean benefit associated with delta F0 differences in the masked vowel task was more than twice as large in listeners with normal hearing (9.4 dB) when compared to listeners with hearing loss (4.4 dB), suggesting less delta F0 benefit in listeners with hearing loss. In both tasks, overall performance of listeners with hearing loss was significantly worse than performance of listeners with normal hearing. Possible reasons for reduced delta F0 benefit and decreased overall performance in listeners with hearing loss include reduced audibility of vowel sounds and deficits in spectro-temporal processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9430762     DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4006.1434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  20 in total

1.  The use of confusion patterns to evaluate the neural basis for concurrent vowel identification.

Authors:  Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  An algorithm to increase intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in the presence of a competing talker.

Authors:  Eric W Healy; Masood Delfarah; Jordan L Vasko; Brittney L Carter; DeLiang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The effect of fundamental frequency contour similarity on multi-talker listening in older and younger adults.

Authors:  Peter A Wasiuk; Mathieu Lavandier; Emily Buss; Jacob Oleson; Lauren Calandruccio
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of age and hearing loss on concurrent vowel identification.

Authors:  Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effect of fundamental-frequency and sentence-onset differences on speech-identification performance of young and older adults in a competing-talker background.

Authors:  Jae Hee Lee; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Abnormal intelligibility of speech in competing speech and in noise in a frequency region where audiometric thresholds are near-normal for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Agnès C Léger; David T Ives; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Computational model predictions of cues for concurrent vowel identification.

Authors:  Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-07-08

8.  Speech masking release in Hybrid cochlear implant users: Roles of spectral and temporal cues in electric-acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Viral D Tejani; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effects of age on concurrent vowel perception in acoustic and simulated electroacoustic hearing.

Authors:  Kathryn H Arehart; Pamela E Souza; Ramesh Kumar Muralimanohar; Christi Wise Miller
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 10.  Pitch, harmonicity and concurrent sound segregation: psychoacoustical and neurophysiological findings.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.