Literature DB >> 9421787

Comparison of strength and failure mode of seven implant systems: an in vitro test.

L Möllersten1, P Lockowandt, L A Lindén.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The mechanical weakness of implant systems is a problem in the clinical situation.
PURPOSE: This study experimentally evaluated how joint design influences the strength and failure mode of dental implant systems.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The strength tests focused on the systems as a whole. Seven implant systems with different joint design were evaluated.
RESULTS: Strength and failure mode varied significantly between the implant systems and deep joints, in contrast to shallow joints, favored resistance to bending moments. The mean failure force ranged between 138 to 693 Newtons for the various implant systems.
CONCLUSION: In construction of implant systems, joint depth should be taken into consideration.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9421787     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(97)70009-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  12 in total

1.  A technique elucidating the retrieval of an adhered cover screw in a dental implant - a case report.

Authors:  J Bhuvaneswarri; S C Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-10-23

2.  Resistance of three implant-abutment interfaces to fatigue testing.

Authors:  Cleide Gisele Ribeiro; Maria Luiza Cabral Maia; Susanne S Scherrer; Antonio Carlos Cardoso; H W Anselm Wiskott
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  Influence of the connection design and titanium grades of the implant complex on resistance under static loading.

Authors:  Su-Jung Park; Suk-Won Lee; Richard Leesungbok; Su-Jin Ahn
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  The fracture strength by a torsion test at the implant-abutment interface.

Authors:  Fumihiko Watanabe; Kazuhiko Hiroyasu; Kazuhiko Ueda
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2015-10-10

5.  Comparison of fit accuracy and torque maintenance of zirconia and titanium abutments for internal tri-channel and external-hex implant connections.

Authors:  Hakimeh Siadat; Elaheh Beyabanaki; Niloufar Mousavi; Marzieh Alikhasi
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  A Comparative 3D Finite Element Computational Study of Three Connections.

Authors:  Davide Farronato; Mattia Manfredini; Andrea Stevanello; Veronica Campana; Lorenzo Azzi; Marco Farronato
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Noninvasive method for retrieval of broken dental implant abutment screw.

Authors:  Jagadish Reddy Gooty; Sunil Kumar Palakuru; Vikram Reddy Guntakalla; Mahipal Nera
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2014-04

Review 8.  Technical complications of implant-causes and management: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Swati Gupta; Hemant Gupta; Amrit Tandan
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Jun

Review 9.  Complications in implant dentistry.

Authors:  Ayesha Hanif; Saima Qureshi; Zeeshan Sheikh; Haroon Rashid
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

10.  Load-Bearing Capacity and Retention of Newly Developed Micro-Locking Implant Prosthetic System: An In Vitro Pilot Study.

Authors:  Jae-Won Choi; Kyung-Hee Choi; Hee-Jin Chae; Sung-Ki Chae; Eun-Bin Bae; Jin-Ju Lee; So-Hyoun Lee; Chang-Mo Jeong; Jung-Bo Huh
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.