Literature DB >> 9418621

Tibial insert undersurface as a contributing source of polyethylene wear debris.

R C Wasielewski1, N Parks, I Williams, H Surprenant, J P Collier, G Engh.   

Abstract

Sixty-seven ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene tibial inserts from cementless total knee arthroplasties were retrieved at autopsy and revision surgery and analyzed for evidence of articular and nonarticular surface wear after a mean implantation time of 62.8 months (range, 4-131 months). Polyethylene cold flow and abrasive wear on the nonarticular insert surface (undersurface) were assigned a wear severity score (Grade 0-4). The severity of articular wear was assessed quantitatively and graded. Corresponding prerevision radiographs were evaluated for evidence of tibial metaphyseal osteolysis and osteolysis around tibial fixation screws. Exact nonparametric conditional inference methods were used to establish correlations between different variables and the occurrence of tibial metaphyseal osteolysis. Severe Grade 4 wear of the tibial insert undersurface was associated with tibial metaphyseal osteolysis or osteolysis around fixation screws. Time in situ statistically was related to Grade 4 undersurface wear and tibial metaphyseal osteolysis. The occurrence of tibial osteolysis was not related statistically to articular wear severity, insert thickness, or implant type. The main articulation between the femoral implant and ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene insert has been assumed to be the primary source of polyethylene debris contributing to osteolysis and total knee arthroplasty implant failure. The undersurface of the insert is an additional source of polyethylene debris contributing to tibial metaphyseal osteolysis. To lessen polyethylene debris produced at this modular interface, the tibial implant locking mechanism should fix the insert firmly to the metal backing to decrease relative micromotion. Because motion between the insert and metal backing may be inevitable, the wear characteristics of the inner tray surface should be optimized to minimize wear debris production at this other articulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9418621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  25 in total

1.  Knee wear measured in retrievals: a polished tray reduces insert wear.

Authors:  Daniel J Berry; John H Currier; Michael B Mayor; John P Collier
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Surface damage versus tibial polyethylene insert conformity: a retrieval study.

Authors:  Markus A Wimmer; Michel P Laurent; Jeannie D Haman; Joshua J Jacobs; Jorge O Galante
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Finite element analysis: a comparison of an all-polyethylene tibial implant and its metal-backed equivalent.

Authors:  S M Thompson; D Yohuno; W N Bradley; A D Crocombe
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  International multi-centre survivorship analysis of mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  James B Stiehl; Karel J Hamelynck; Paul E Voorhorst
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Hybrid total knee arthroplasty: 13-year survivorship of AGC total knee systems with average 7 years followup.

Authors:  Philip M Faris; E Michael Keating; Alex Farris; John B Meding; Merrill A Ritter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Comparison among total knee arthroplasties with a mobile bearing: menisci versus rotating platform versus AP glide platform.

Authors:  Giuseppe Solarino; Andrea Luca; Luigi Marzo; Lorenzo Scialpi; Giovanni B Solarino
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2008-06-27

7.  Long-term outcome of low contact stress total knee arthroplasty with different mobile bearing designs.

Authors:  Giuseppe Solarino; Antonio Spinarelli; Massimiliano Carrozzo; Andrea Piazzolla; Giovanni Vicenti; Biagio Moretti
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2014-08-01

8.  Changes in surface topography at the TKA backside articulation following in vivo service: a retrieval analysis.

Authors:  Richard J Holleyman; Susan C Scholes; David Weir; Simon S Jameson; Jim Holland; Tom J Joyce; David J Deehan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Polished trays reduce backside wear independent of post location in posterior-stabilized TKAs.

Authors:  Matthew P Abdel; Mark W Gesell; Christen W Hoedt; Kathleen N Meyers; Timothy M Wright; Steven B Haas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Current Total Knee Designs: Does Baseplate Roughness or Locking Mechanism Design Affect Polyethylene Backside Wear?

Authors:  Zachary W Sisko; Matthew G Teeter; Brent A Lanting; James L Howard; Richard W McCalden; Douglas D Naudie; Steven J MacDonald; Edward M Vasarhelyi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.