Literature DB >> 9410677

[Intraoperative cholangiography as a routine method? A prospective, controlled, randomized study].

C Nies1, F Bauknecht, C Groth, T Clerici, D Bartsch, J Lange, M Rothmund.   

Abstract

A prospective, controlled, randomized trial was conducted in 275 patients with symptomatic gall stone disease, whose history, laboratory data or sonographical findings did not suggest common bile duct stones. Of these patients, 137 did not undergo intraoperative fluoroscopic cholangiography (IOC), but in the remaining 138 patients IOC was attempted. In 111 cases (80.4%) the biliary system was sufficiently visualized. In 3 patients (2.7%) calculi in the cystic or common bile duct were diagnosed, which would have been overlooked without IOC. IOC was false-positive in one case. One year after the operation the patients were asked to return for a follow-up examination. Three patients in the group without IOC had had symptomatic passage of a stone, and one had a common bile duct stone removed by endoscopic papillotomy. A retained stone was discussed as etiology for a pancreatitis in a fifth patient in this group. No patient sustained long-term sequelae from the retained common bile duct stones. None of the patients in the IOC group had evidence of cholangiolithiasis at follow-up. There was no difference between the study groups concerning the incidence of post-operative complications. The operations with IOC lasted significantly longer (92 +/- 31 min vs 77 +/- 28 min). According to our data and those published earlier, the additional financial and logistic expenditure associated with routine IOC is not justified. Patients with the preoperative suspicion of a common bile duct stone should have endoscopic bile duct clearance (ERCP and EPT) prior to cholecystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9410677     DOI: 10.1007/s001040050290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  10 in total

1.  Improving the safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the routine use of preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiography.

Authors:  C Ausch; G Hochwarter; M Taher; B Holzer; H R Rosen; M Urban; C Sebesta; W Hruby; R Schiessel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Half of the currecnt practice of gastrointestinal surgery is against the evidence: a survery of the French Society of Digestive Surgery.

Authors:  Karen Slim; Yves Panis; Jacques Chipponi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Evidence-based surgical practice in academic medical centers: consistently anecdotal?

Authors:  Marcovalerio Melis; Richard C Karl; Sandra L Wong; Murray F Brennan; Jeffrey B Matthews; Kevin K Roggin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus intraoperative cholangiography for diagnosis of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Vanja Giljaca; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

5.  Role of routine intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Ashwani Kumar; Upasna Kumar; Anand Munghate; Ashvind Bawa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  The standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R Bittner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-05-14       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Results of cholecystectomy without intraoperative cholangiography.

Authors:  John W Lorimer
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 8.  Endoscopic ultrasonography versus other diagnostic modalities in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Spiros N Sgouros; Christina Bergele
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 3.487

9.  Do endosonographers agree on the presence of bile duct sludge and the subsequent need for intervention?

Authors:  Rutger Quispel; Hannah M Schutz; Nora D Hallensleben; Abha Bhalla; Robin Timmer; Jeanin E van Hooft; Niels G Venneman; Nicole S Erler; Bart J Veldt; Lydi M J W van Driel; Marco J Bruno
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-05-27

Review 10.  Routine on-table cholangiography during cholecystectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  M S Sajid; C Leaver; Z Haider; T Worthington; N Karanjia; K K Singh
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.891

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.