Literature DB >> 20213210

Evidence-based surgical practice in academic medical centers: consistently anecdotal?

Marcovalerio Melis1, Richard C Karl, Sandra L Wong, Murray F Brennan, Jeffrey B Matthews, Kevin K Roggin.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Randomized trials, meta-analyses, and guidelines form the basis of clinical decision making. We queried a small sample of surgeons at three academic medical centers to determine whether key elements of surgical practice were concordant with available evidence.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A French Society of Digestive Surgery (FSDS) questionnaire was submitted to general surgery trainees and faculty at the University of South Florida and University of Chicago and to surgical oncology fellows at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Participants were asked to respond "never," "rarely," "often," or "always" to 13 questions involving different aspects of gastrointestinal surgery. For each question, a correct evidence-based answer was available from published studies. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: One hundred ten surgeons (79% of eligible participants) completed the survey. Only 60% of the answers were concordant with existing data. The percentages of correct answers did not differ significantly according to institution or level of experience of participants. The low frequency of correct responses in our subjects paralleled the findings from the 2004 FSDS study. Variability in the quality of evidence and ambiguity in the survey questions may have influenced the responses, but evidence-based medicine does not appear to uniformly influence clinical decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20213210     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-010-1175-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  38 in total

1.  Practitioners of evidence based care. Not all clinicians need to appraise evidence from scratch but all need some skills.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; M O Meade; R Z Jaeschke; D J Cook; R B Haynes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-08

Review 2.  Evidence-based surgery.

Authors:  Jonathan L Meakins
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Handsewn vs. stapled anastomoses in colon and rectal surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  H M MacRae; R S McLeod
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Nasogastric decompression following elective colorectal surgery: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  N J Petrelli; J P Stulc; M Rodriguez-Bigas; L Blumenson
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 0.688

5.  Abdominal wound closure comparing the proximate stapler with sutures.

Authors:  D Lubowski; D Hunt
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1985-08

6.  Prospective randomized trial comparing Nissen to Nissen-Rossetti technique for laparoscopic fundoplication.

Authors:  E Chrysos; A Tzortzinis; J Tsiaoussis; H Athanasakis; J Vasssilakis; E Xynos
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Routine cholangiography is not warranted during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  D G Clair; D L Carr-Locke; J M Becker; D C Brooks
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1993-05

8.  Closure of laparotomy wounds: skin staples versus sutures.

Authors:  C J Ranaboldo; D C Rowe-Jones
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 9.  Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses.

Authors:  P Y G Choy; I P Bissett; J G Docherty; B R Parry; A E H Merrie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-07-18

10.  A meta-analysis of selective versus routine nasogastric decompression after elective laparotomy.

Authors:  M L Cheatham; W C Chapman; S P Key; J L Sawyers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  3 in total

1.  Does surgeon experience affect outcomes in pathologic stage I lung cancer?

Authors:  Paul J Scheel; Traves D Crabtree; Jennifer M Bell; Christine Frederiksen; Stephen R Broderick; A Sasha Krupnick; Daniel Kreisel; G Alexander Patterson; Bryan F Meyers; Varun Puri
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Overuse of surgery in patients with pancreatic cancer. A nationwide analysis in Italy.

Authors:  Gianpaolo Balzano; Giovanni Capretti; Giuditta Callea; Elena Cantù; Flavia Carle; Raffaele Pezzilli
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  The Effect of the Diffusion of the Surgical Robot on the Hospital-level Utilization of Partial Nephrectomy.

Authors:  Ganesh Sivarajan; Glen B Taksler; Dawn Walter; Cary P Gross; Raul E Sosa; Danil V Makarov
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.983

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.