Literature DB >> 15702530

Half of the currecnt practice of gastrointestinal surgery is against the evidence: a survery of the French Society of Digestive Surgery.

Karen Slim1, Yves Panis, Jacques Chipponi.   

Abstract

The French Society of Digestive Surgery conducted a survey among its members to assess whether or not the routine practice of gastrointestinal surgery is evidence based. The questionnaire included 13 questions focusing on several aspects of gastrointestinal surgery and for which strong evidence exists. The participants (n = 379) were asked to respond according to their usual practice. The response rate was 75%. Only 57% +/- 15% of the responses were in accordance with the evidence. That rate of evidence-based responses did not differ according to the age of participants but was higher at university hospitals (P = 0.05).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15702530     DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2004.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  32 in total

Review 1.  [Mechanical sutures in digestive surgery. Guidelines of the French Society of Digestive Surgery].

Authors:  K Slim; Y Panis; T Perniceni; J Escat
Journal:  J Chir (Paris)       Date:  2000-02

2.  Handsewn vs. stapled anastomoses in colon and rectal surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  H M MacRae; R S McLeod
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Nasogastric decompression following elective colorectal surgery: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  N J Petrelli; J P Stulc; M Rodriguez-Bigas; L Blumenson
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  Abdominal wound closure comparing the proximate stapler with sutures.

Authors:  D Lubowski; D Hunt
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1985-08

5.  Closure of the abdominal midline fascia: meta-analysis delineates the optimal technique.

Authors:  J Rucinski; M Margolis; G Panagopoulos; L Wise
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  Prospective randomized trial comparing Nissen to Nissen-Rossetti technique for laparoscopic fundoplication.

Authors:  E Chrysos; A Tzortzinis; J Tsiaoussis; H Athanasakis; J Vasssilakis; E Xynos
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Routine cholangiography is not warranted during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  D G Clair; D L Carr-Locke; J M Becker; D C Brooks
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1993-05

8.  Closure of laparotomy wounds: skin staples versus sutures.

Authors:  C J Ranaboldo; D C Rowe-Jones
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  What is the role of mechanical bowel preparation in patients undergoing colorectal surgery?

Authors:  C Platell; J Hall
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  A meta-analysis of selective versus routine nasogastric decompression after elective laparotomy.

Authors:  M L Cheatham; W C Chapman; S P Key; J L Sawyers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  9 in total

1.  Evidence-based medicine--from best research evidence to a better surgical practice and health care.

Authors:  G Antes; S Sauerland; C M Seiler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  How surgeons make decisions: authority and evidence.

Authors:  Huug Obertop
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Massimiliano Greco; Giovanni Capretti; Luigi Beretta; Marco Gemma; Nicolò Pecorelli; Marco Braga
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Perioperative protocols in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Mia Debarros; Scott R Steele
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-09

5.  Overuse of surgery in patients with pancreatic cancer. A nationwide analysis in Italy.

Authors:  Gianpaolo Balzano; Giovanni Capretti; Giuditta Callea; Elena Cantù; Flavia Carle; Raffaele Pezzilli
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Evidence-based surgical practice in academic medical centers: consistently anecdotal?

Authors:  Marcovalerio Melis; Richard C Karl; Sandra L Wong; Murray F Brennan; Jeffrey B Matthews; Kevin K Roggin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Comparison of Internal Medicine and General Surgery Residents' Assessments of Risk of Postsurgical Complications in Surgically Complex Patients.

Authors:  James M. Healy; Kimberly A. Davis; Kevin Y. Pei
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 14.766

8.  International preoperative rectal cancer management: staging, neoadjuvant treatment, and impact of multidisciplinary teams.

Authors:  Knut M Augestad; Rolv-Ole Lindsetmo; Jonah Stulberg; Harry Reynolds; Anthony Senagore; Brad Champagne; Alexander G Heriot; Fabien Leblanc; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Proceedings of the first international summit on intestinal anastomotic leak, Chicago, Illinois, October 4-5, 2012.

Authors:  Benjamin D Shogan; Gary C An; Hans M Schardey; Jeffrey B Matthews; Konstantin Umanskiy; James W Fleshman; Jens Hoeppner; Donald E Fry; Eduardo Garcia-Granereo; Hans Jeekel; Harry van Goor; E Patchen Dellinger; Vani Konda; Jack A Gilbert; Gregory W Auner; John C Alverdy
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 2.150

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.