Literature DB >> 15759179

Improving the safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the routine use of preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiography.

C Ausch1, G Hochwarter, M Taher, B Holzer, H R Rosen, M Urban, C Sebesta, W Hruby, R Schiessel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the value of routinely performed preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) in detecting common bile duct (CBD) stones in patients stated to undergo elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In addition, we used MRC to investigate possible variants of the cystic duct.
METHODS: Magnetic resonance cholangiography was performed preoperatively in 773 patients (311 male and 462 female; median age 55 years, range 16-91) who had no clinical signs of cholestasis prior to undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In cases where the MRC was positive for CBD stones, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatiography (ERCP) was then performed. A total of 532 patients were available for continuous postoperatively follow-up (median 54 months, range 36-85). In 462 patients (247 female, and 215 male), MR images were also reviewed for variants of the cystic duct.
RESULTS: In 705 patients (91%), MRC was negative for CBD stones. In 64 patients (9%) MRC was positive. Of these patients, 47 (6%) had CBD stones on ERCP. In 12 patients (2%), MRC was false positive. In five cases (0.6%), ERCP had an inconclusive result postoperative follow-up (532 patients, or 69%) revealed evidence of CBD stones in three patients (10.4%) despite a preoperative negative MRC result. Anatomical variants in the course of the cystic duct and its confluence with the common bile duct were found in 27 of 462 patients (6%).
CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance cholangiography proved to be a reliable screening technique in the preoperative evaluation of patients with silent CBD stones. Imaging of the course of the cystic duct is possible in a high percentage of cases. Therefore, MRC can be recommended as a screening technique before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15759179     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-9093-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  30 in total

1.  Routine intraoperative cholangiogram.

Authors:  A Kitahama; M D Kerstein; J L Overby; M D Kappelman; W R Webb
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1986-04

2.  Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic cholecystectomy without routine intraoperative cholangiography.

Authors:  I Braghetto; A Debandi; O Korn; J Bastias
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1998-10

Review 3.  Surgical management of benign lesions of the bile ducts.

Authors:  R K Tompkins; H A Pitt
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  The value of routine peroperative cholangiography--a report of 4000 cholecystectomies.

Authors:  P J Doyle; J N Ward-McQuaid; A M Smith
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Choledocholithiasis and bile duct stenosis: diagnostic accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  C D Becker; M Grossholz; M Becker; G Mentha; R de Peyer; F Terrier
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  F V Coakley; L H Schwartz
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects.

Authors:  A S Fulcher; M A Turner; G W Capps; A M Zfass; K M Baker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  J A Soto; M A Barish; E K Yucel; D Siegenberg; J T Ferrucci; R Chuttani
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Laparoscopic cholangiography. Results and indications.

Authors:  J L Flowers; K A Zucker; S M Graham; W A Scovill; A L Imbembo; R W Bailey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  The standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R Bittner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-05-14       Impact factor: 3.445

View more
  20 in total

1.  Laparoendoscopic rendezvous: an effective alternative to a failed preoperative ERCP in patients with cholecystocholedocholithiasis.

Authors:  George Tzovaras; Ioannis Baloyiannis; Andreas Kapsoritakis; Athanassios Psychos; George Paroutoglou; Spyros Potamianos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The "inside approach of the gallbladder" is an alternative to the classic Calot's triangle dissection for a safe operation in severe cholecystitis.

Authors:  Catherine Hubert; Laurence Annet; Bernard E van Beers; Jean-François Gigot
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus laparoendoscopic rendezvous in patients with gallbladder and bile duct stones.

Authors:  Mario Morino; Filippo Baracchi; Claudio Miglietta; Niccolò Furlan; Riccardo Ragona; Aldo Garbarini
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Is routine MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) justified prior to cholecystectomy?

Authors:  C A Nebiker; S A Baierlein; S Beck; M von Flüe; C Ackermann; R Peterli
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Surgery for common bile duct stones--a lost surgical skill; still worthwhile in the minimally invasive century?

Authors:  Harald Puhalla; Nathan Flint; Nicholas O'Rourke
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Preoperative evaluation of the cystic duct for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of navigator-gated prospective acquisition correction- and conventional respiratory-triggered techniques at free-breathing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Ryo Itatani; Tomohiro Namimoto; Hiroo Kajihara; Akira Yoshimura; Kazuhiro Katahira; Jiro Nasu; Ikuo Matsushita; Fumi Sakamoto; Masafumi Kidoh; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Inpatient magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: does it increase the efficiency in emergency hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery services?

Authors:  J A Milburn; J A Bailey; Wk Dunn; I C Cameron; D S Gomez
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Low conjunction of the cystic duct with the common bile duct: does it correlate with the formation of common bile duct stones?

Authors:  I Tsitouridis; G Lazaraki; C Papastergiou; E Pagalos; G Germanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  ENBD tube placement prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy may reduce the rate of complications in cases with predictably complicating biliary anomalies.

Authors:  Takehiro Noji; Fumitaka Nakamura; Toru Nakamura; Kentaro Kato; On Suzuki; Yoshiyasu Ambo; Akihiro Kishida; Hiroyuki Maguchi; Satoshi Kondo; Nobuichi Kashimura
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 7.527

10.  Intrahepatic biliary duct branching patterns, cystic duct anomalies, and pancreas divisum in a tertiary referral center: A magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticographic study.

Authors:  Ankur Gupta; Praveer Rai; Vivek Singh; Rakesh Kumar Gupta; Vivek Anand Saraswat
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.