Literature DB >> 9403533

A randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing cefepime plus metronidazole with imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections. Cefepime Intra-abdominal Infection Study Group.

P S Barie1, S B Vogel, E P Dellinger, O D Rotstein, J S Solomkin, J Y Yang, T F Baumgartner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cefepime hydrochloride plus metronidazole vs the combination of imipenem and cilastatin sodium in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adult patients.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study.
SETTING: University-affiliated hospitals in the United States and Canada. PATIENTS: Three hundred twenty-three patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections in whom an operative procedure or percutaneous drainage was required for diagnosis and management. INTERVENTION: Cefepime, 2 g, was administered intravenously every 12 hours (n= 164) in addition to metronidazole, 500 mg (or 7.5 mg/kg) intravenously every 6 hours. Imipenen-cilastatin sodium, 500 mg, was administered intravenously every 6 hours (n= 159). Surgical infection management was determined by the patients' surgeons. MAIN OUTCOME ASSESSMENTS: Clinical cure, defined as elimination of all signs and symptoms relevant to the original infection; and treatment failure, defined as persistence, increase or worsening of signs and symptoms resulting in an antibiotic change, requirement of an additional surgical procedure to cure the infection, or a wound infection with fever.
RESULTS: Of the initial isolates, 84% were susceptible to cefepime and 92% were susceptible to imipenem-cilastatin. Among the 217 protocol-valid patients, those treated with cefepime+metronidizole were deemed clinical cures (88%) more frequently than were imipenem-cilastatin-treated patients (76%) (P=.02). Using multivariate analysis to adjust for identified clinical risk factors for an adverse outcome (severity of presenting illness, isolation of enterococcus, type of infection, and duration of prestudy hospitalization), there was a trend (P=.06) toward a higher cure rate favoring cefepime+metronidazole. Pathogens were eradicated in significantly (P=.01) more patients treated with combined cefepime and metronidazole (89%) than with imipenem-cilastatin (76%).
CONCLUSION: The combination of cefepime plus metronidazole is safe and effective therapy for patients with severe intra-abdominal infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9403533     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430360040008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  21 in total

Review 1.  Use of newer quinolones for the treatment of intraabdominal infections: focus on clinafloxacin.

Authors:  C E Nord
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 2.  New developments and concepts in antimicrobial therapy for intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  Z Younes; D A Johnson
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2000-08

Review 3.  [Antimicrobial and antimycotic therapy of intra-abdominal infections].

Authors:  P Kujath; M Hoffmann; A Rodloff
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Canadian practice guidelines for surgical intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  Anthony W Chow; Gerald A Evans; Avery B Nathens; Chad G Ball; Glen Hansen; Godfrey Km Harding; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Karl Weiss; George G Zhanel
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.471

5.  Prospective randomized trials affect the outcomes of intraabdominal infection.

Authors:  J I Merlino; M A Malangoni; C M Smith; R L Lange
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Cost efficacy of tazobactam/piperacillin versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infection.

Authors:  E S Dietrich; B Schubert; W Ebner; F Daschner
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  [Complicated intra-abdominal infections: pathogens, resistance. Recommendations of the Infectliga on antbiotic therapy].

Authors:  K-F Bodmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 8.  Cefepime: a reappraisal in an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Andrea Endimiani; Federico Perez; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 9.  Comparative review of the carbapenems.

Authors:  George G Zhanel; Ryan Wiebe; Leanne Dilay; Kristjan Thomson; Ethan Rubinstein; Daryl J Hoban; Ayman M Noreddin; James A Karlowsky
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  [Prospective comparative observational study on the antibiotic treatment of secondary peritonitis in Germany -- efficacy and cost analysis].

Authors:  U Mittelkötter; F Endter; H B Reith; H Thielemann; R Schmitz; P Ihle; K-H Kullmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.