J I Merlino1, M A Malangoni, C M Smith, R L Lange. 1. Department of Surgery, MetroHealth Medical Center Campus, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44109, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients with intraabdominal infections enrolled in prospective randomized trials (PRTs) with those of a cohort of patients not enrolled in a trial. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Prospective randomized trials are the gold standard for the evaluation of new treatments. Patients are screened using rigorous eligibility criteria and sometimes are excluded from PRTs because of associated medical conditions or more severe illness. However, the effect that the exclusion of these patients has on the applicability of clinical trial outcomes has not been defined. METHODS: One hundred sixty-eight adults with intraabdominal infection were treated at a single institution during 7 years. Fifty-three patients were enrolled in four PRTs comparing various antibiotic regimens for treatment; 115 were not enrolled. Patient characteristics and outcomes of these two groups were compared. RESULTS: Patients with infections from appendicitis (n = 68) had a low severity of illness and similar outcomes in both groups. These patients and those for whom a concurrent PRT was unavailable were excluded from subsequent analysis. Eighty-eight patients (42 PRT, 46 not enrolled) with serious infection remained for analysis. Patients enrolled in PRTs were younger, had less severe illness, had a decreased length of stay, a lower incidence of antibiotic resistance, and less frequent extraabdominal infections than those not enrolled in a trial. Patients enrolled in PRTs were more likely to be cured and were less likely to die. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that cure was associated with a lower initial severity of illness, absence of antibiotic resistance, and participation in a PRT. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with intraabdominal infection enrolled in PRTs have an increased likelihood of cure and survival. This is due in part to a lower incidence of antibiotic resistance, which may reflect improved drug selection. Patients not enrolled in PRTs are at greater risk for treatment failure and death because of concomitant illness. Outcomes from PRTs may not be applicable to all patients with intraabdominal infections.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients with intraabdominal infections enrolled in prospective randomized trials (PRTs) with those of a cohort of patients not enrolled in a trial. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Prospective randomized trials are the gold standard for the evaluation of new treatments. Patients are screened using rigorous eligibility criteria and sometimes are excluded from PRTs because of associated medical conditions or more severe illness. However, the effect that the exclusion of these patients has on the applicability of clinical trial outcomes has not been defined. METHODS: One hundred sixty-eight adults with intraabdominal infection were treated at a single institution during 7 years. Fifty-three patients were enrolled in four PRTs comparing various antibiotic regimens for treatment; 115 were not enrolled. Patient characteristics and outcomes of these two groups were compared. RESULTS:Patients with infections from appendicitis (n = 68) had a low severity of illness and similar outcomes in both groups. These patients and those for whom a concurrent PRT was unavailable were excluded from subsequent analysis. Eighty-eight patients (42 PRT, 46 not enrolled) with serious infection remained for analysis. Patients enrolled in PRTs were younger, had less severe illness, had a decreased length of stay, a lower incidence of antibiotic resistance, and less frequent extraabdominal infections than those not enrolled in a trial. Patients enrolled in PRTs were more likely to be cured and were less likely to die. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that cure was associated with a lower initial severity of illness, absence of antibiotic resistance, and participation in a PRT. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with intraabdominal infection enrolled in PRTs have an increased likelihood of cure and survival. This is due in part to a lower incidence of antibiotic resistance, which may reflect improved drug selection. Patients not enrolled in PRTs are at greater risk for treatment failure and death because of concomitant illness. Outcomes from PRTs may not be applicable to all patients with intraabdominal infections.
Authors: S Davis; P W Wright; S F Schulman; L D Hill; R D Pinkham; L P Johnson; T W Jones; H B Kellogg; H M Radke; W W Sikkema Journal: Cancer Date: 1985-10-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Anthony W Chow; Gerald A Evans; Avery B Nathens; Chad G Ball; Glen Hansen; Godfrey Km Harding; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Karl Weiss; George G Zhanel Journal: Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol Date: 2010 Impact factor: 2.471
Authors: Massimo Sartelli; Fausto Catena; Salomone Di Saverio; Luca Ansaloni; Mark Malangoni; Ernest E Moore; Frederick A Moore; Rao Ivatury; Raul Coimbra; Ari Leppaniemi; Walter Biffl; Yoram Kluger; Gustavo P Fraga; Carlos A Ordonez; Sanjay Marwah; Igor Gerych; Jae Gil Lee; Cristian Tranà; Federico Coccolini; Francesco Corradetti; James Kirkby-Bott Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2014-03-27 Impact factor: 5.469