Literature DB >> 14673536

[Prospective comparative observational study on the antibiotic treatment of secondary peritonitis in Germany -- efficacy and cost analysis].

U Mittelkötter1, F Endter, H B Reith, H Thielemann, R Schmitz, P Ihle, K-H Kullmann.   

Abstract

AIMS: Cephalosporins and broad-spectrum penicillins in combination with metronidazole are suitable for treatment of secondary peritonitis. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and bacteriological efficacy, length of hospital stay (LOS), treatment costs of ceftriaxone (CRO) in combination with metronidazole vs standard regimens (SR) 1 and 2.
METHODS: Patient data were subjected to matched-pairs analysis according to four different categories of the Mannheim peritonitis index. RESULTS. From January 1998 to March 2000, a total of 365 patients from 59 surgical wards in German hospitals were included. Clinical efficacy was 90.2% vs 70.4% ( P=0.004) for CRO/SR 1 and 78.3% vs 82.6% for CRO/SR 2. Bacteriological efficacy was comparable. Antibiotic treatment costs were 593/539 Euros for CRO/SR 1 and 466/750 Euros for CRO/SR 2, i.e., costs for CRO were 37.9% lower than with SR 2.
CONCLUSION: Based on clinical, bacteriological, and pharmacoeconomic results, ceftriaxone in combination with metronidazole can be regarded as a first-line antimicrobial treatment of secondary peritonitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14673536     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-003-0721-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  8 in total

Review 1.  American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference: definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  [Diffusion of ceftriaxone in healthy and infected peritoneal tissue].

Authors:  Y Rio; F Bur; J Didion; F Jurin
Journal:  Pathol Biol (Paris)       Date:  1989-05

3.  Ceftriaxone/metronidazole is more effective than ampicillin/netilmicin/metronidazole in the treatment of bacterial peritonitis.

Authors:  M Luke; J Iversen; J Søndergaard; E Kvist; P Lund; F Andersen; L Naver; P N Larsen; B Clausen; J Prag
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1991 Jun-Jul

4.  Risk factors associated with intraabdominal infections: a prospective multicenter study. Peritonitis Study Group.

Authors:  H Wacha; T Hau; R Dittmer; C Ohmann
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  A randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing cefepime plus metronidazole with imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections. Cefepime Intra-abdominal Infection Study Group.

Authors:  P S Barie; S B Vogel; E P Dellinger; O D Rotstein; J S Solomkin; J Y Yang; T F Baumgartner
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1997-12

Review 6.  [Therapy of peritonitis today. Surgical management and adjuvant therapy strategies].

Authors:  H B Reith
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1997

7.  [1996 pathogen incidence and resistance status in peritonitis].

Authors:  J Focht; K Nösner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1997

8.  [Comparative study of the cost-effectiveness of initial therapy with imipenem/cilastatin in secondary peritonitis].

Authors:  A C Rodloff; P Kujath; B Lünstedt; W Gaus
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 0.955

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Which cause of diffuse peritonitis is the deadliest in the tropics? A retrospective analysis of 305 cases from the South-West Region of Cameroon.

Authors:  Alain Chichom-Mefire; Tabe Alain Fon; Marcelin Ngowe-Ngowe
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 5.469

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.