Literature DB >> 17488146

Comparative review of the carbapenems.

George G Zhanel1, Ryan Wiebe, Leanne Dilay, Kristjan Thomson, Ethan Rubinstein, Daryl J Hoban, Ayman M Noreddin, James A Karlowsky.   

Abstract

The carbapenems are beta-lactam antimicrobial agents with an exceptionally broad spectrum of activity. Older carbapenems, such as imipenem, were often susceptible to degradation by the enzyme dehydropeptidase-1 (DHP-1) located in renal tubules and required co-administration with a DHP-1 inhibitor such as cilastatin. Later additions to the class such as meropenem, ertapenem and doripenem demonstrated increased stability to DHP-1 and are administered without a DHP-1 inhibitor. Like all beta-lactam antimicrobial agents, carbapenems act by inhibiting bacterial cell wall synthesis by binding to and inactivating penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs). Carbapenems are stable to most beta-lactamases including AmpC beta-lactamases and extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. Resistance to carbapenems develops when bacteria acquire or develop structural changes within their PBPs, when they acquire metallo-beta-lactamases that are capable of rapidly degrading carbapenems, or when changes in membrane permeability arise as a result of loss of specific outer membrane porins. Carbapenems (imipenem, meropenem, doripenem) possess broad-spectrum in vitro activity, which includes activity against many Gram-positive, Gram-negative and anaerobic bacteria; carbapenems lack activity against Enterococcus faecium, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Compared with imipenem, meropenem and doripenem, the spectrum of activity of ertapenem is more limited primarily because it lacks activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterococcus spp. Imipenem, meropenem and doripenem have in vivo half lives of approximately 1 hour, while ertapenem has a half-life of approximately 4 hours making it suitable for once-daily administration. As with other beta-lactam antimicrobial agents, the most important pharmacodynamic parameter predicting in vivo efficacy is the time that the plasma drug concentration is maintained above the minimum inhibitory concentration (T>MIC). Imipenem/cilastatin and meropenem have been studied in comparative clinical trials establishing their efficacy in the treatment of a variety of infections including complicated intra-abdominal infections, skin and skin structure infections, community-acquired pneumonia, nosocomial pneumonia, complicated urinary tract infections, meningitis (meropenem only) and febrile neutropenia. The current role for imipenem/cilastatin and meropenem in therapy remains for use in moderate to severe nosocomial and polymicrobial infections. The unique antimicrobial spectrum and pharmacokinetic properties of ertapenem make it more suited to treatment of community-acquired infections and outpatient intravenous antimicrobial therapy than for the treatment of nosocomial infections. Doripenem is a promising new carbapenem with similar properties to those of meropenem, although it appears to have more potent in vitro activity against P. aeruginosa than meropenem. Clinical trials are required to establish the efficacy and safety of doripenem in moderate to severe infections, including nosocomial infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17488146     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200767070-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  105 in total

1.  Neurotoxicity of carbapenem antibiotics: consequences for their use in bacterial meningitis.

Authors:  S R Norrby
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  In vitro activities of ertapenem (MK-0826) against recent clinical bacteria collected in Europe and Australia.

Authors:  D M Livermore; M W Carter; S Bagel; B Wiedemann; F Baquero; E Loza; H P Endtz; N van Den Braak; C J Fernandes; L Fernandes; N Frimodt-Moller; L S Rasmussen; H Giamarellou; E Giamarellos-Bourboulis; V Jarlier; J Nguyen; C E Nord; M J Struelens; C Nonhoff; J Turnidge; J Bell; R Zbinden; S Pfister; L Mixson; D L Shungu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Intraabdominal tissue concentration of ertapenem.

Authors:  M Wittau; E Wagner; V Kaever; T Koal; D Henne-Bruns; R Isenmann
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  In vitro antianaerobic activity of ertapenem (MK-0826) compared to seven other compounds.

Authors:  Dianne B Hoellman; Linda M Kelly; Kim Credito; Lauren Anthony; Lois M Ednie; Michael R Jacobs; Peter C Appelbaum
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Meropenem versus ceftazidime in the treatment of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia: a randomized, double-blind trial.

Authors:  R Feld; B DePauw; S Berman; A Keating; W Ho
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Penetration of ertapenem into different pulmonary compartments of patients undergoing lung surgery.

Authors:  Olaf Burkhardt; Jolanta Majcher-Peszynska; Klaus Borner; Ralf Mundkowski; Bernd Drewelow; Hartmut Derendorf; Tobias Welte
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.126

7.  The pharmacokinetics of meropenem in volunteers.

Authors:  R P Bax; W Bastain; A Featherstone; D M Wilkinson; M Hutchison; S J Haworth
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  Comparative activity of doripenem and three other carbapenems tested against Gram-negative bacilli with various beta-lactamase resistance mechanisms.

Authors:  Ronald N Jones; Helio S Sader; Thomas R Fritsche
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.803

9.  General microbiology and in vitro susceptibility of anaerobes isolated from complicated skin and skin-structure infections in patients enrolled in a comparative trial of ertapenem versus piperacillin-tazobactam.

Authors:  Ellie J C Goldstein; Diane M Citron; C Vreni Merriam; Yumi Warren; Kerin L Tyrrell; Richard M Gesser
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 10.  Ertapenem: a review of its use in the management of bacterial infections.

Authors:  Monique Curran; Dene Simpson; Caroline Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

View more
  98 in total

Review 1.  Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections: The Old Antimicrobials and the New Players.

Authors:  Young R Lee; Danni McMahan; Catherine McCall; Gregory K Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Comparison of the pharmacodynamics of biapenem in bronchial epithelial lining fluid in healthy volunteers given half-hour and three-hour intravenous infusions.

Authors:  Eiki Kikuchi; Junko Kikuchi; Yasuyuki Nasuhara; Satoshi Oizumi; Akitoshi Ishizaka; Masaharu Nishimura
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Detection of biofilm production of Yersinia enterocolitica strains isolated from infected children and comparative antimicrobial susceptibility of biofilm versus planktonic forms.

Authors:  A Ioannidis; A Kyratsa; V Ioannidou; S Bersimis; S Chatzipanagiotou
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.074

4.  Canadian practice guidelines for surgical intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  Anthony W Chow; Gerald A Evans; Avery B Nathens; Chad G Ball; Glen Hansen; Godfrey Km Harding; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Karl Weiss; George G Zhanel
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 5.  Adaptation to Adversity: the Intermingling of Stress Tolerance and Pathogenesis in Enterococci.

Authors:  Anthony O Gaca; José A Lemos
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 11.056

6.  Dosing nomograms for attaining optimum concentrations of meropenem by continuous infusion in critically ill patients with severe gram-negative infections: a pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics-based approach.

Authors:  Federico Pea; Pierluigi Viale; Piergiorgio Cojutti; Mario Furlanut
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of meropenem and biapenem in bile and dosing considerations for biliary tract infections based on site-specific pharmacodynamic target attainment.

Authors:  Kazuro Ikawa; Akira Nakashima; Norifumi Morikawa; Kayo Ikeda; Yoshiaki Murakami; Hiroki Ohge; Hartmut Derendorf; Taijiro Sueda
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  A systematic review and meta-analyses show that carbapenem use and medical devices are the leading risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Anne F Voor In 't Holt; Juliëtte A Severin; Emmanuel M E H Lesaffre; Margreet C Vos
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Comparative in vitro activity of Meropenem, Imipenem and Piperacillin/tazobactam against 1071 clinical isolates using 2 different methods: a French multicentre study.

Authors:  Marie-Laure Joly-Guillou; Marie Kempf; Jean-Didier Cavallo; Monique Chomarat; Luc Dubreuil; Jeanne Maugein; Claudette Muller-Serieys; Micheline Roussel-Delvallez
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  Characteristics of doripenem: a new broad-spectrum antibiotic.

Authors:  Francisco Alvarez-Lerma; Santiago Grau; Olivia Ferrández
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 4.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.