Literature DB >> 9400949

Phase I and pharmacological study of sequential intravenous topotecan and oral etoposide.

V M Herben1, W W ten Bokkel Huinink, A C Dubbelman, I A Mandjes, Y Groot, D M van Gortel-van Zomeren, J H Beijnen.   

Abstract

We performed a phase I and pharmacological study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of a cytotoxic regimen of the novel topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan in combination with the topoisomerase II inhibitor etoposide, and to investigate the clinical pharmacology of both compounds. Patients with advanced solid tumours were treated at 4-week intervals, receiving topotecan intravenously over 30 min on days 1-5 followed by etoposide given orally twice daily on days 6-12. Topotecan-etoposide dose levels were escalated from 0.5/20 to 1.0/20, 1.0/40, and 1.25/40 (mg m-2 day-1)/(mg bid). After encountering DLT, additional patients were treated at 3-week intervals with the topotecan dose decreased by one level to 1.0 mg m-2 and etoposide administration prolonged from 7 to 10 days to allow further dose intensification. Of 30 patients entered, 29 were assessable for toxicity in the first course and 24 for response. The DLT was neutropenia. At doses of topotecan-etoposide 1.25/40 (mg m-2)/(mg bid) two out of six patients developed neutropenia grade IV that lasted more than 7 days. Reduction of the treatment interval to 3 weeks and prolonging etoposide dosing to 10 days did not permit further dose intensification, as a time delay to retreatment owing to unrecovered bone marrow rapidly emerged as the DLT. Post-infusion total plasma levels of topotecan declined in a biphasic manner with a terminal half-life of 2.1 +/- 0.3 h. Total body clearance was 13.8 +/- 2.7 l h-1 m-2 with a steady-state volume of distribution of 36.7 +/- 6.2 l m-2. N-desmethyltopotecan, a metabolite of topotecan, was detectable in plasma and urine. Mean maximal concentrations ranged from 0.23 to 0.53 nmol l-1, and were reached at 3.4 +/- 1.0 h after infusion. Maximal etoposide plasma concentrations of 0.75 +/- 0.54 and 1.23 +/- 0.57 micromol l-1 were reached at 2.4 +/- 1.2 and 2.3 +/- 1.0 h after ingestion of 20 and 40 mg respectively. The topotecan area under the plasma concentration vs time curve (AUC) correlated with the percentage decrease in white blood cells (WBC) (r2 = 0.70) and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) (r2 = 0.65). A partial response was observed in a patient with metastatic ovarian carcinoma. A total of 64% of the patients had stable disease for at least 4 months. The recommended dose for use in phase II clinical trials is topotecan 1.0 mg m-2 on days 1-5 and etoposide 40 mg bid on days 6-12 every 4 weeks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9400949      PMCID: PMC2228184          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1997.585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  27 in total

Review 1.  Topoisomerase-targeting antitumor drugs.

Authors:  P D'Arpa; L F Liu
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1989-12-17

2.  Nonproductive rearrangement of DNA topoisomerase I and II genes: correlation with resistance to topoisomerase inhibitors.

Authors:  K B Tan; M R Mattern; W K Eng; F L McCabe; R K Johnson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-11-15       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  DNA topoisomerases.

Authors:  J C Wang
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 4.  Kinetics of pharmacologic response.

Authors:  N H Holford; L B Sheiner
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 12.310

5.  Elevated expression of DNA topoisomerase II in camptothecin-resistant human tumor cell lines.

Authors:  Y Sugimoto; S Tsukahara; T Oh-hara; L F Liu; T Tsuruo
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1990-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Involvement of nucleic acid synthesis in cell killing mechanisms of topoisomerase poisons.

Authors:  P D'Arpa; C Beardmore; L F Liu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1990-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Antagonism between camptothecin and topoisomerase II-directed chemotherapeutic agents in a human leukemia cell line.

Authors:  S H Kaufmann
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1991-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  A randomized trial to evaluate the effect of schedule on the activity of etoposide in small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  M L Slevin; P I Clark; S P Joel; S Malik; R J Osborne; W M Gregory; D G Lowe; R H Reznek; P F Wrigley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  High-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of the semisynthetic epipodophyllotoxins teniposide and etoposide using electrochemical detection.

Authors:  J A Sinkule; W E Evans
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 3.534

10.  Effects of CPT-11 in combination with other anti-cancer agents in culture.

Authors:  Y Kano; K Suzuki; M Akutsu; K Suda; Y Inoue; M Yoshida; S Sakamoto; Y Miura
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1992-02-20       Impact factor: 7.396

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetically guided administration of chemotherapeutic agents.

Authors:  H J van den Bongard; R A Mathôt; J H Beijnen; J H Schellens
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Convection-enhanced delivery of a topoisomerase I inhibitor (nanoliposomal topotecan) and a topoisomerase II inhibitor (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin) in intracranial brain tumor xenografts.

Authors:  Yoji Yamashita; Michal T Krauze; Tomohiro Kawaguchi; Charles O Noble; Daryl C Drummond; John W Park; Krystof S Bankiewicz
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 3.  The role of oral etoposide in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  R L Comis; D M Friedland; B C Good
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Topotecan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (TCE) in the treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma. Results of a phase-II trial.

Authors:  Thorsten Simon; Alfred Längler; Urs Harnischmacher; Michael C Frühwald; Norbert Jorch; Alexander Claviez; Frank Berthold; Barbara Hero
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of treatment with oral etoposide.

Authors:  Giuseppe Toffoli; Giuseppe Corona; Barbara Basso; Mauro Boiocchi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Convection-enhanced delivery of nanoliposomal CPT-11 (irinotecan) and PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) in rodent intracranial brain tumor xenografts.

Authors:  Michal T Krauze; Charles O Noble; Tomohiro Kawaguchi; Daryl Drummond; Dmitri B Kirpotin; Yoji Yamashita; Erika Kullberg; John Forsayeth; John W Park; Krystof S Bankiewicz
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 12.300

7.  Effects of the combination of camptothecin and doxorubicin or etoposide on rat glioma cells and camptothecin-resistant variants.

Authors:  V Pavillard; D Kherfellah; S Richard; J Robert; D Montaudon
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Oral topotecan: bioavailablity and effect of food co-administration.

Authors:  V M Herben; H Rosing; W W ten Bokkel Huinink; D M van Zomeren; D Batchelor; E Doyle; F D Beusenberg; J H Beijnen; J H Schellens
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Phase I study of cisplatin, irinotecan, and epirubicin administered every 3 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumours.

Authors:  X Chen; A M Oza; Z Kusenda; Q-L Yi; D Kochman; M J Moore; A J Davis; L L Siu
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-08-18       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  A phase I clinical trial of continual alternating etoposide and topotecan in refractory solid tumours.

Authors:  R T Penson; M V Seiden; U A Matulonis; L J Appleman; A F Fuller; A Goodman; S M Campos; J W Clark; M Roche; J P Eder
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.