Literature DB >> 9398798

Dual-channel ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring. A useful diagnostic tool?

J M Wo1, J G Hunter, J P Waring.   

Abstract

Ambulatory pH monitoring of the distal esophagus is the most accurate diagnostic study for patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The measurement of proximal esophageal acid exposure time may be useful in patients with atypical reflux symptoms. The aim of this study is to evaluate if proximal esophageal pH monitoring provides useful information beyond that learned with distal esophageal pH monitoring. We routinely performed dual-channel pH monitoring with pH electrodes positioned at 20 and 5 cm above the manometric lower esophageal sphincter from January 1992 to August 1995. All patients scored their esophageal symptoms from zero (none) to four (severe). We compared proximal esophageal reflux (PR) in patients with typical symptoms (i.e., heartburn, regurgitation) and in patients with atypical symptoms (i.e., chest pain, cough, hoarseness, and asthma). We compared symptom profiles between patients with and without PR. We reviewed our experience in patients with abnormal PR, but with a normal amount of distal esophageal reflux (DR). We studied 441 consecutive patients. There were no significant differences in PR between patients with typical and atypical symptoms. There were no differences in symptom profiles between patients with normal and abnormal PR. There were no differences of PR between the different atypical symptoms. PR did not correlate with the severity of the patient's symptoms. PR correlated well only with DR. Twenty-four patients had isolated abnormal PR, but only six patients improved with antireflux therapy. We conclude that routine ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring of the proximal esophagus appears to be of little value. The decision to offer patients an empiric trial of antireflux therapy for suspected GERD should not be based on the presence or absence of PR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9398798     DOI: 10.1023/a:1018802330957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  33 in total

1.  Ambulatory esophageal and hypopharyngeal pH monitoring in patients with hoarseness.

Authors:  P O Katz
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Does the intraesophageal pH probe accurately detect acid reflux? Simultaneous recording with two pH probes in humans.

Authors:  D W Murphy; Y Yuan; D O Castell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  The role of the vague nerve in airway narrowing caused by intraesophageal hydrochloric acid provocation and esophageal distention.

Authors:  L E Mansfield; H H Hameister; H S Spaulding; N J Smith; N Glab
Journal:  Ann Allergy       Date:  1981-12

4.  Esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring in the diagnosis of pulmonary aspiration secondary to gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  M G Patti; H T Debas; C A Pellegrini
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Ambulatory 24-hour pH-metry in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Determination of criteria and relation to endoscopy.

Authors:  A A Masclee; A C de Best; R de Graaf; O J Cluysenaer; J B Jansen
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  Comparison of airway responses following tracheal or esophageal acidification in the cat.

Authors:  D N Tuchman; J T Boyle; A I Pack; J Scwartz; M Kokonos; A R Spitzer; S Cohen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Gastro-oesophageal reflux and triggering of bronchial asthma: a negative report.

Authors:  T Ekström; L Tibbling
Journal:  Eur J Respir Dis       Date:  1987-09

8.  Comparison of medical and surgical therapy for complicated gastroesophageal reflux disease in veterans. The Department of Veterans Affairs Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Study Group.

Authors:  S J Spechler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-03-19       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Frequency and site of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with chest symptoms. Studies using proximal and distal pH monitoring.

Authors:  O L Gastal; J A Castell; D O Castell
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology.

Authors:  K R DeVault; D O Castell
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1995-11-13
View more
  6 in total

1.  A new technique for measurement of pharyngeal pH: normal values and discriminating pH threshold.

Authors:  S Ayazi; J C Lipham; J A Hagen; A L Tang; J Zehetner; J M Leers; A Oezcelik; E Abate; F Banki; S R DeMeester; T R DeMeester
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Diagnosis and management of supra-esophageal complications of reflux disease.

Authors:  T T Nostrant; J C Rabine
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2000-06

3.  Clinical manifestations and role of proton pump inhibitors in the management of laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Authors:  Suhail Amin Patigaroo; S F Hashmi; Syed Abrar Hasan; M R Ajmal; Nazia Mehfooz
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-04-30

4.  Diagnosis of supra-esophageal gastric reflux: correlation of oropharyngeal pH with esophageal impedance monitoring for gastro-esophageal reflux.

Authors:  E Chiou; R Rosen; H Jiang; S Nurko
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Efficacy of laparoscopic fundoplication in patients with chronic cough and gastro-oesophageal reflux.

Authors:  Adam Frankel; Hock Soo Ong; B Mark Smithers; Les K Nathanson; David C Gotley
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 3.671

6.  Proximal sensor data from routine dual-sensor esophageal pH monitoring is often inaccurate.

Authors:  Matt McCollough; Abdul Jabbar; Robert Cacchione; Jeff W Allen; Steve Harrell; John M Wo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.199

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.