Literature DB >> 2714140

Does the intraesophageal pH probe accurately detect acid reflux? Simultaneous recording with two pH probes in humans.

D W Murphy1, Y Yuan, D O Castell.   

Abstract

Little is known about the accuracy of intraesophageal pH monitoring, ie, do false negatives occur? This study was designed based on the assumption that if two pH probes are placed equidistant from a distal acid source, and the probes measure different values, then one probe might miss acid if it were there alone. We performed 24-hr intraesophageal pH monitoring in 10 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, simultaneously placing two pediatric pH probes (probes A and B) 5 cm proximal to the LES in such close proximity that one would expect only small differences in the acid exposure measured by the probes. However, the amount of acid exposure measured by probes A and B differed greatly in some instances. Individual probe performance does not alone account for these differences, since, when pH recordings were reviewed, one probe was as likely to miss acid exposure as the other. These differences would result in a change in the clinical diagnosis in two of 10 patients. Variability in the number of episodes was great and occurred even when there was concordance in percent acid exposure. These data raise questions about the absolute accuracy of the pH probe as the gold standard in the measurement of gastroesophageal reflux.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2714140     DOI: 10.1007/BF01540333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  12 in total

1.  INTRALUMINAL AND JUXTAMUCOSAL DUODENAL PH.

Authors:  J BIRCHER; C V MANN; H C CARLSON; C F CODE; R A ROVELSTAD
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1965-04       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Factors influencing the continuous recording of in situ pH of gastric and duodenal contents.

Authors:  R A ROVELSTAD; C A OWEN; T B MAGATH
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1952-04       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Comparison of stationary vs ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring recording systems.

Authors:  J L Herrera; J K Simpson; C L Maydonovitch; R K Wong
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Electrodes for 24 hours pH monitoring--a comparative study.

Authors:  G McLauchlan; J M Rawlings; M L Lucas; R F McCloy; G P Crean; K E McColl
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. Technology searching for a clinical application.

Authors:  B W Ward; W C Wu; J E Richter; K W Lui; D O Castell
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.062

6.  Effect of sleep on swallowing, esophageal peristalsis, and acid clearance.

Authors:  W C Orr; L F Johnson; M G Robinson
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Effect of esophageal emptying and saliva on clearance of acid from the esophagus.

Authors:  J F Helm; W J Dodds; L R Pelc; D W Palmer; W J Hogan; B C Teeter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-02-02       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Gastroesophageal reflux. Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy.

Authors:  J E Richter; D O Castell
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  pH of the microclimate lining human gastric and duodenal mucosa in vivo. Studies in control subjects and in duodenal ulcer patients.

Authors:  E M Quigley; L A Turnberg
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Limitations of 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring in the hospital setting.

Authors:  P K Schlesinger; P E Donahue; B Schmid; T J Layden
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  21 in total

1.  Functional Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD).

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-08

2.  Dynamic position versus 24-hour pH testing for detection of esophageal acid reflux disease.

Authors:  Carl G Schowengerdt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Variations in results of simultaneous ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring.

Authors:  F J Hampton; U M MacFadyen; J F Mayberry
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Acid reflux event detection using the Bravo wireless versus the Slimline catheter pH systems: why are the numbers so different?

Authors:  J E Pandolfino; Q Zhang; M A Schreiner; S Ghosh; M P Roth; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-05-28       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  [Correct diagnosis for indication in gastroesophageal reflux disease].

Authors:  A H Hölscher; E Bollschweiler; Ch Gutschow; P Malfertheiner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 6.  Diagnosis of reflux disease.

Authors:  N I McDougall
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1996 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  Dynamic effects of acid on Barrett's esophagus. An ex vivo proliferation and differentiation model.

Authors:  R C Fitzgerald; M B Omary; G Triadafilopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Doubt on pH-metry as an absolute gold standard for measuring acid gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  G S Mela; V Savarino
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Validation of a new method of measuring esophageal acid exposure: comparison with 24-hour pH monitoring.

Authors:  J Tack; G Vantrappen; G Huyberechts; D Sifrim; J Janssens; R Van Overstraeten
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Combined ambulatory esophageal manometry and dual-probe pH-metry in evaluation of patients with chronic unexplained cough.

Authors:  W G Paterson; B W Murat
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.