Literature DB >> 19421822

A new technique for measurement of pharyngeal pH: normal values and discriminating pH threshold.

S Ayazi1, J C Lipham, J A Hagen, A L Tang, J Zehetner, J M Leers, A Oezcelik, E Abate, F Banki, S R DeMeester, T R DeMeester.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Identifying gastroesophageal reflux disease as the cause of respiratory and laryngeal complaints is difficult and depends largely on the measurements of increased acid exposure in the upper esophagus or ideally the pharynx. The current method of measuring pharyngeal pH environment is inaccurate and problematic due to artifacts. A newly designed pharyngeal pH probe to avoid these artifacts has been introduced. The aim of this study was to use this probe to measure the pharyngeal pH environment in normal subjects and establish pH thresholds to identify abnormality.
METHODS: Asymptomatic volunteers were studied to define the normal pharyngeal pH environment. All subjects underwent esophagram, esophageal manometry, upper and lower esophageal pH monitoring with a dual-channel pH catheter and pharyngeal pH monitoring with the new probe. Analyses were performed at 0.5 pH intervals between pH 4 and 6.5 to identify the best discriminating pH threshold and calculate a composite pH score to identify an abnormal pH environment.
RESULTS: The study population consisted of 55 normal subjects. The pattern of pharyngeal pH environment was significantly different in the upright and supine periods and required different thresholds. The calculated discriminatory pH threshold was 5.5 for upright and 5.0 for supine periods. The 95th percentile values for the composite score were 9.4 for upright and 6.8 for supine.
CONCLUSION: A new pharyngeal pH probe which detects aerosolized and liquid acid overcomes the artifacts that occur in measuring pharyngeal pH with existing catheters. Discriminating pH thresholds were selected and normal values defined to identify patients with an abnormal pharyngeal pH environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19421822     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-009-0915-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  19 in total

1.  Prevalence of reflux in 113 consecutive patients with laryngeal and voice disorders.

Authors:  J A Koufman; M R Amin; M Panetti
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Typical GERD symptoms and esophageal pH monitoring are not enough to diagnose pharyngeal reflux.

Authors:  Brant K Oelschlager; Lily Chang; Charles E Pope; Carlos A Pellegrini
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  Exclusion of pH artifacts is essential for hypopharyngeal pH monitoring.

Authors:  Steven P Harrell; Jennifer Koopman; Scheryl Woosley; John M Wo
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Chronic hoarseness secondary to gastroesophageal reflux disease: documentation with 24-h ambulatory pH monitoring.

Authors:  G J Wiener; J A Koufman; W C Wu; J B Cooper; J E Richter; D O Castell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Spatiotemporal characteristics of physiological gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  B L Weusten; L M Akkermans; G P vanBerge-Henegouwen; A J Smout
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1994-03

6.  Effect of laparoscopic fundoplication on gastroesophageal reflux disease-induced respiratory symptoms.

Authors:  M G Patti; M Arcerito; A Tamburini; U Diener; C V Feo; B Safadi; P Fisichella; L W Way
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Chronic xerostomia increases esophageal acid exposure and is associated with esophageal injury.

Authors:  M A Korsten; A S Rosman; S Fishbein; R D Shlein; H E Goldberg; A Biener
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Characteristics and clinical relevance of proximal esophageal pH monitoring.

Authors:  Mike Cool; Johan Poelmans; Louw Feenstra; Jan Tack
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Proximal esophageal pH-metry in patients with 'reflux laryngitis'.

Authors:  P Jacob; P J Kahrilas; G Herzon
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 10.  The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): a clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury.

Authors:  J A Koufman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  48 in total

1.  [The possibilities of reflux disease diagnosis by the ear, nose and throat specialist].

Authors:  P Jecker
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Gastroesophageal reflux diseases in childhood. Diagnosis and therapy].

Authors:  P Ahrens
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Hypopharyngeal pepsin and Sep70 as diagnostic markers of laryngopharyngeal reflux: preliminary study.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Komatsu; Lori A Kelly; Ali H Zaidi; Christina L Rotoloni; Juliann E Kosovec; Emily J Lloyd; Amina Waheed; Toshitaka Hoppo; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Oropharyngeal Reflux Monitoring and Atypical Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  Dhyanesh A Patel; Ali H Harb; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-03

5.  Relationship between functional endoscopy and impedance-pH measurement.

Authors:  F Michel; T Stroh; R Fritsche; P Ahrens
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  [Relationship between functional endoscopy and impedance-pH measurement. German version].

Authors:  F Michel; T Stroh; R Fritsche; P Ahrens
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: Weak Acid and Weaker Correlations.

Authors:  Steven R DeMeester
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Acidic Pharyngeal Reflux Does Not Correlate with Symptoms and Laryngeal Injury Attributed to Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.

Authors:  Martin Duricek; Peter Banovcin; Tatiana Halickova; Rudolf Hyrdel; Marian Kollarik
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 9.  [Extraesophageal reflux. Overview and discussion of a new method for pH monitoring].

Authors:  M Jungheim; M Ptok
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 10.  Current perspectives on reflux laryngitis.

Authors:  Daisuke Asaoka; Akihito Nagahara; Kenshi Matsumoto; Mariko Hojo; Sumio Watanabe
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.