J O Delancey1, M R Toglia, D Perucchini. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, USA. delancey@umich.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the anatomy of the internal and external anal sphincters in the area of midline obstetric lacerations, to gain insight into sphincter damage and repair. METHODS: The length, craniocaudal extent, and overlap of the internal and external anal sphincters in the perineal body were measured in 17 cadavers. Further anatomic observations were made in four sets of whole pelvis cross-sections taken in the sagittal, coronal, and transverse planes. During the repair of 20 acute fourth-degree lacerations, observations were made to determine the internal sphincter visibility following birth. RESULTS: The external and internal and sphincters overlap by 17.0 mm (standard deviation [SD] 6.9), with the internal sphincter lying between the external sphincter and the anal canal. The internal sphincter extends an additional 12.2 mm (SD 5.9) cranial to the proximal extent of the external sphincter, whereas the caudal margin of the internal sphincter lies 3.7 mm (SD 7.2) cranial to the distal margin of the external sphincter. In pregnant women who sustained a fourth-degree laceration, we found that the internal sphincter can be identified as a rubbery white layer adjacent to the anal submucosa lying between the external sphincter and the anal canal. CONCLUSION: The internal anal sphincter lies between the anal mucosa and the external anal sphincter and extends more than a centimeter above the cranial margin of the external sphincter, a region where it is disrupted when a fourth-degree obstetric laceration has occurred.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the anatomy of the internal and external anal sphincters in the area of midline obstetric lacerations, to gain insight into sphincter damage and repair. METHODS: The length, craniocaudal extent, and overlap of the internal and external anal sphincters in the perineal body were measured in 17 cadavers. Further anatomic observations were made in four sets of whole pelvis cross-sections taken in the sagittal, coronal, and transverse planes. During the repair of 20 acute fourth-degree lacerations, observations were made to determine the internal sphincter visibility following birth. RESULTS: The external and internal and sphincters overlap by 17.0 mm (standard deviation [SD] 6.9), with the internal sphincter lying between the external sphincter and the anal canal. The internal sphincter extends an additional 12.2 mm (SD 5.9) cranial to the proximal extent of the external sphincter, whereas the caudal margin of the internal sphincter lies 3.7 mm (SD 7.2) cranial to the distal margin of the external sphincter. In pregnant women who sustained a fourth-degree laceration, we found that the internal sphincter can be identified as a rubbery white layer adjacent to the anal submucosa lying between the external sphincter and the anal canal. CONCLUSION: The internal anal sphincter lies between the anal mucosa and the external anal sphincter and extends more than a centimeter above the cranial margin of the external sphincter, a region where it is disrupted when a fourth-degree obstetric laceration has occurred.
Authors: Kate V Meriwether; Rebecca J Hall; Lawrence M Leeman; Laura Migliaccio; Clifford Qualls; Rebecca G Rogers Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2014-10-25 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Kate V Meriwether; Mark E Lockhart; Isuzu Meyer; Holly E Richter Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Date: 2019 Jan/Feb Impact factor: 2.091
Authors: Kate V Meriwether; Rebecca J Hall; Lawrence M Leeman; Laura Migliaccio; Clifford Qualls; Rebecca G Rogers Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2015-06-18 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Holly E Richter; Charles W Nager; Kathryn L Burgio; Ryan Whitworth; Alison C Weidner; Joseph Schaffer; Halina M Zyczynski; Peggy Norton; John Eric Jelovsek; Susan F Meikle; Cathie Spino; Marie Gantz; Scott Graziano; Linda Brubaker Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Date: 2015 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.091
Authors: Kate V Meriwether; Rebecca J Hall; Lawrence M Leeman; Laura Migliaccio; Clifford Qualls; Rebecca G Rogers Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2013-10-09 Impact factor: 2.894