Literature DB >> 17221149

Translabial ultrasound assessment of the anal sphincter complex: normal measurements of the internal and external anal sphincters at the proximal, mid-, and distal levels.

Rebecca J Hall1, Rebecca G Rogers, Lori Saiz, C Qualls.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to measure the internal and external anal sphincters using translabial ultrasound (TLU) at the proximal, mid, and distal levels of the anal sphincter complex. The human review committee approval was obtained and all women gave written informed consent. Sixty women presenting for gynecologic ultrasound for symptoms other than pelvic organ prolapse or urinary or anal incontinence underwent TLU. Thirty-six (60%) were asymptomatic and intact, 13 symptomatic and intact, and 11 disrupted. Anterior-posterior diameters of the internal anal sphincter at all levels and the external anal sphincter at the distal level were measured in four quadrants. Mean sphincter measurements are given for symptomatic and asymptomatic intact women and are comparable to previously reported endoanal MRI and ultrasound measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17221149     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-006-0254-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  44 in total

1.  Transperineal ultrasonography: new method to image the anorectal region.

Authors:  H Kleinübing; J F Jannini; O Malafaia; S Brenner; T M Pinho
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Short communication: endoanal ultrasound during contraction of the anal sphincter--improved definition and diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  N A Rieger; P R Downey; D A Wattchow
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Prospective assessment of the clinical value of anorectal investigations.

Authors:  C J Vaizey; M A Kamm
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.216

4.  Effect of second vaginal delivery on anorectal physiology and faecal continence: a prospective study.

Authors:  M Fynes; V Donnelly; M Behan; P R O'Connell; C O'Herlihy
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-09-18       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Anatomy of the anal sphincters. Comparison of anal endosonography to magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  A Schäfer; P Enck; G Fürst; T Kahn; T Frieling; H J Lübke
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Pudendal nerve damage during labour: prospective study before and after childbirth.

Authors:  A H Sultan; M A Kamm; C N Hudson
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1994-01

7.  Accuracy and reliability of transanal ultrasound for anterior anal sphincter injury.

Authors:  S M Sentovich; W D Wong; G J Blatchford
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Transanal ultrasound and manometry in the evaluation of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  P M Falk; G J Blatchford; R L Cali; M A Christensen; A G Thorson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Third-degree obstetric perineal tear: long-term clinical and functional results after primary repair.

Authors:  A C Poen; R J Felt-Bersma; R L Strijers; G A Dekker; M A Cuesta; S G Meuwissen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Anal sphincter defects in fecal incontinence: correlation between endosonography and surgery.

Authors:  C Meyenberger; P Bertschinger; G F Zala; P Buchmann
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 10.093

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound imaging of the anal sphincter complex: a review.

Authors:  Z Abdool; A H Sultan; R Thakar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Correlation between gross anatomical topography, sectional sheet plastination, microscopic anatomy and endoanal sonography of the anal sphincter complex in human males.

Authors:  S Al-Ali; P Blyth; S Beatty; A Duang; B Parry; I P Bissett
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  A simplified method for anal ultrasonography: assessment of patient satisfaction and the simplicity of the procedure.

Authors:  D Castellani; E Antonelli; G Sabatino; V Giuliano; A Morelli; G Bassotti
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 4.  Anorectal morphology and function: analysis of the Shafik legacy.

Authors:  A P Zbar; M Guo; M Pescatori
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  High-resolution three-dimensional endovaginal ultrasonography in the assessment of pelvic floor anatomy: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Giulio Aniello Santoro; Andrzej Paweł Wieczorek; Aleksandra Stankiewicz; Magdalena Maria Woźniak; Michał Bogusiewicz; Tomasz Rechberger
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-06-17

6.  Anal sphincter complex: 2D and 3D endoanal and translabial ultrasound measurement variation in normal postpartum measurements.

Authors:  Kate V Meriwether; Rebecca J Hall; Lawrence M Leeman; Laura Migliaccio; Clifford Qualls; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  The relationship of 3-D translabial ultrasound anal sphincter complex measurements to postpartum anal and fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Kate V Meriwether; Rebecca J Hall; Lawrence M Leeman; Laura Migliaccio; Clifford Qualls; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Postpartum translabial 2D and 3D ultrasound measurements of the anal sphincter complex in primiparous women delivering by vaginal birth versus Cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Kate V Meriwether; Rebecca J Hall; Lawrence M Leeman; Laura Migliaccio; Clifford Qualls; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 9.  Translabial ultrasound in the assessment of pelvic floor and anorectal function in women with defecatory disorders.

Authors:  H P Dietz
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Interobserver agreement in perineal ultrasound measurement of the anovaginal distance: a methodological study.

Authors:  Sofia Pihl; Eva Uustal; Linda Hjertberg; Marie Blomberg
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 2.894

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.