Literature DB >> 29068801

Anal Sphincter Anatomy Prepregnancy to Postdelivery Among the Same Primiparous Women on Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Kate V Meriwether, Mark E Lockhart1, Isuzu Meyer2, Holly E Richter2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The authors used 2-dimensional images from pelvic 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to characterize changes in the internal anal sphincter (IAS) and external anal sphincter (EAS) from prepregnancy to postdelivery in the same cohort.
METHODS: This secondary analysis studied a prospective cohort of women undergoing 3 T MRI before their first pregnancy and 6 or more months after delivery. Radial thickness was measured at 12, 3, 9, and 6 o'clock from axial proximal and mid views and oblique distal views of the IAS, and at 3 and 9 o'clock from oblique views of the EAS. Measurements were compared prepregnancy to postdelivery; 10 women had 80% power (α = 0.05) to detect a 0.85-mm change.
RESULTS: Nineteen women completed initial 3 T MRI, 15 achieved pregnancy and birth, and 10 completed postdelivery MRI (4 vaginal birth and 6 Cesarean delivery). Mean change in measurement from prepregnancy to postdelivery was -0.01 mm ± 1.03 mm for the distal 12 o'clock IAS (P = 0.98) and +0.19 ± 0.64 mm for the lateral EAS (P = 0.32). All prepregnancy and postdelivery women had discontinuous EA sphincters at 6 and 12 o'clock. There were no statistically significant changes from prepregnancy to postdelivery in any IAS or EAS location (all >0.05) for the entire cohort, those with vaginal birth, or after Cesarean.
CONCLUSIONS: Anal sphincter measurements on MRI did not change significantly in nulliparous women prepregnancy to postdelivery at any location, and the EAS was not measurable at 12 o'clock in any women at either time point, challenging classic concepts of EAS anatomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29068801      PMCID: PMC5916743          DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 2151-8378            Impact factor:   2.091


  24 in total

1.  Normal female anal sphincter: difficulties in interpretation explained.

Authors:  R C Bollard; A Gardiner; S Lindow; K Phillips; G S Duthie
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Anal canal anatomy showed by three-dimensional anorectal ultrasonography.

Authors:  F Sergio P Regadas; Sthela M Murad-Regadas; Doryane M R Lima; Flavio R Silva; Rosilma G L Barreto; Marcellus H L P Souza; F Sergio P Regadas Filho
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The diagnostic accuracy of endovaginal and transperineal ultrasound for detecting anal sphincter defects: The PREDICT study.

Authors:  A-M Roos; Z Abdool; A H Sultan; R Thakar
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 2.350

5.  Outcome of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in terms of persisting endoanal ultrasonographic defects and defecatory symptoms.

Authors:  Eefje J Oude Lohuis; Ellen Everhardt
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.561

6.  Transperineal three-dimensional ultrasound imaging for detection of anatomic defects in the anal sphincter complex muscles.

Authors:  Milena M Weinstein; Dolores H Pretorius; Sung-Ai Jung; Charles W Nager; Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 11.382

7.  Contribution of the second stage of labour to pelvic floor dysfunction: a prospective cohort comparison of nulliparous women.

Authors:  R G Rogers; L M Leeman; N Borders; C Qualls; A M Fullilove; D Teaf; R J Hall; E Bedrick; L L Albers
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  Ten-year outcome after anal sphincter repair for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Massarat Zutshi; Tracy Hull Tracey; Jane Bast; Amy Halverson; Jeanie Na
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery.

Authors:  A H Sultan; M A Kamm; C N Hudson; J M Thomas; C I Bartram
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-23       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Anal incontinence, urinary incontinence and sexual problems in primiparous women - a comparison between women with episiotomy only and women with episiotomy and obstetric anal sphincter injury.

Authors:  Mona Stedenfeldt; Jouko Pirhonen; Ellen Blix; Tom Wilsgaard; Barthold Vonen; Pål Øian
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 2.809

View more
  2 in total

1.  Finite element modeling of maximum stress in pelvic floor structures during the head expulsion (FINESSE) study.

Authors:  Hana Cechova; Vladimir Kalis; Linda Havelkova; Zdenek Rusavy; Pavel Fiala; Martina Rybarova; Ludek Hyncik; Ladislav Krofta; Khaled M Ismail
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Ultrasound imaging of maternal birth trauma.

Authors:  Hans Peter Dietz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.894

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.