INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Consensus on normal translabial ultrasound (TL-US) anal sphincter complex measurements for postpartum women is lacking. We aimed to evaluate normative measurements in 2D and 3D TL-US for the anal sphincter complex (ASC) at 6 months postpartum and compare these measurements in women who had a vaginal birth (VB) and in those who had a Cesarean delivery (CD). METHODS: A large, prospective cohort of primiparous women underwent 2D and 3D TL-US 6 months after their first delivery. For normative sphincter measurements, we excluded women with third- or fourth-degree lacerations or with sphincter interruption on TL-US. Measurements included the sphincter thickness at the 3, 6, 9, and 12 o'clock positions of the external anal sphincter (EAS) and the internal anal sphincter (IAS) at proximal, mid, and distal levels. We also measured the mean coronal diameter of the pubovisceralis muscle (PVM). RESULTS: 696 women consented to participate, and 433 women presented for ultrasound imaging 6 months later. Women who sustained a third- or fourth-degree laceration had significantly thicker EAS measurements at 12 o'clock. Sphincter asymmetry was common (69 %), but was not related to mode of delivery. Only IAS measurements at the proximal and distal 12 o'clock position were significantly thicker for CD patients. There were no significant differences in the EAS or PVM measurements between VB and CD women. CONCLUSIONS: There appear to be few differences in normative sphincter ultrasound measurements between primiparous patients who had VB or CD.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Consensus on normal translabial ultrasound (TL-US) anal sphincter complex measurements for postpartum women is lacking. We aimed to evaluate normative measurements in 2D and 3D TL-US for the anal sphincter complex (ASC) at 6 months postpartum and compare these measurements in women who had a vaginal birth (VB) and in those who had a Cesarean delivery (CD). METHODS: A large, prospective cohort of primiparous women underwent 2D and 3D TL-US 6 months after their first delivery. For normative sphincter measurements, we excluded women with third- or fourth-degree lacerations or with sphincter interruption on TL-US. Measurements included the sphincter thickness at the 3, 6, 9, and 12 o'clock positions of the external anal sphincter (EAS) and the internal anal sphincter (IAS) at proximal, mid, and distal levels. We also measured the mean coronal diameter of the pubovisceralis muscle (PVM). RESULTS: 696 women consented to participate, and 433 women presented for ultrasound imaging 6 months later. Women who sustained a third- or fourth-degree laceration had significantly thicker EAS measurements at 12 o'clock. Sphincter asymmetry was common (69 %), but was not related to mode of delivery. Only IAS measurements at the proximal and distal 12 o'clock position were significantly thicker for CDpatients. There were no significant differences in the EAS or PVM measurements between VB and CDwomen. CONCLUSIONS: There appear to be few differences in normative sphincter ultrasound measurements between primiparous patients who had VB or CD.
Authors: A P Wieczorek; A Stankiewicz; G A Santoro; M M Woźniak; M Bogusiewicz; T Rechberger Journal: World J Urol Date: 2011-06-14 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Rachel L West; Richelle J F Felt-Bersma; Bettina E Hansen; W Rudolf Schouten; Ernst J Kuipers Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Kate V Meriwether; Rebecca J Hall; Lawrence M Leeman; Laura Migliaccio; Clifford Qualls; Rebecca G Rogers Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2014-10-25 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Kate V Meriwether; Rebecca G Rogers; Gena C Dunivan; Jill K Alldredge; Clifford Qualls; Laura Migliaccio; Lawrence Leeman Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2016-02-13 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Kate V Meriwether; Rebecca J Hall; Lawrence M Leeman; Laura Migliaccio; Clifford Qualls; Rebecca G Rogers Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2015-06-18 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Rebecca G Rogers; Cara Ninivaggio; Kelly Gallagher; A Noelle Borders; Clifford Qualls; Lawrence M Leeman Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2017-04-17 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Linda S Burkett; Timothy P Canavan; Stephanie M Glass Clark; Lauren E Giugale; Amanda M Artsen; Pamela A Moalli Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2022-08-17 Impact factor: 1.932