Literature DB >> 24105408

Postpartum translabial 2D and 3D ultrasound measurements of the anal sphincter complex in primiparous women delivering by vaginal birth versus Cesarean delivery.

Kate V Meriwether1, Rebecca J Hall, Lawrence M Leeman, Laura Migliaccio, Clifford Qualls, Rebecca G Rogers.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Consensus on normal translabial ultrasound (TL-US) anal sphincter complex measurements for postpartum women is lacking. We aimed to evaluate normative measurements in 2D and 3D TL-US for the anal sphincter complex (ASC) at 6 months postpartum and compare these measurements in women who had a vaginal birth (VB) and in those who had a Cesarean delivery (CD).
METHODS: A large, prospective cohort of primiparous women underwent 2D and 3D TL-US 6 months after their first delivery. For normative sphincter measurements, we excluded women with third- or fourth-degree lacerations or with sphincter interruption on TL-US. Measurements included the sphincter thickness at the 3, 6, 9, and 12 o'clock positions of the external anal sphincter (EAS) and the internal anal sphincter (IAS) at proximal, mid, and distal levels. We also measured the mean coronal diameter of the pubovisceralis muscle (PVM).
RESULTS: 696 women consented to participate, and 433 women presented for ultrasound imaging 6 months later. Women who sustained a third- or fourth-degree laceration had significantly thicker EAS measurements at 12 o'clock. Sphincter asymmetry was common (69 %), but was not related to mode of delivery. Only IAS measurements at the proximal and distal 12 o'clock position were significantly thicker for CD patients. There were no significant differences in the EAS or PVM measurements between VB and CD women.
CONCLUSIONS: There appear to be few differences in normative sphincter ultrasound measurements between primiparous patients who had VB or CD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24105408      PMCID: PMC4574689          DOI: 10.1007/s00192-013-2215-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  31 in total

1.  Internal and external anal sphincter anatomy as it relates to midline obstetric lacerations.

Authors:  J O Delancey; M R Toglia; D Perucchini
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Pelvic floor disorders: role of new ultrasonographic techniques.

Authors:  A P Wieczorek; A Stankiewicz; G A Santoro; M M Woźniak; M Bogusiewicz; T Rechberger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Obstetric anal sphincter injury: prospective evaluation of incidence.

Authors:  A Varma; J Gunn; A Gardiner; S W Lindow; G S Duthie
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  High-resolution endoluminal sonography of the anal sphincter complex.

Authors:  A A Alexander; L S Miller; J B Liu; R I Feld; B B Goldberg
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Normal anal sphincter anatomy and age- and sex-related variations at high-spatial-resolution endoanal MR imaging.

Authors:  E Rociu; J Stoker; M J Eijkemans; J S Laméris
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Endosonography of the anal sphincter in women of different ages and parity.

Authors:  M Starck; M Bohe; B Fortling; L Valentin
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.299

7.  Volume measurements of the anal sphincter complex in healthy controls and fecal-incontinent patients with a three-dimensional reconstruction of endoanal ultrasonography images.

Authors:  Rachel L West; Richelle J F Felt-Bersma; Bettina E Hansen; W Rudolf Schouten; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Meta-analysis to determine the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter damage.

Authors:  M Oberwalder; J Connor; S D Wexner
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair.

Authors:  A H Sultan; M A Kamm; C N Hudson; C I Bartram
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-04-02

10.  Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery.

Authors:  A H Sultan; M A Kamm; C N Hudson; J M Thomas; C I Bartram
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-23       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  8 in total

1.  Anal sphincter complex: 2D and 3D endoanal and translabial ultrasound measurement variation in normal postpartum measurements.

Authors:  Kate V Meriwether; Rebecca J Hall; Lawrence M Leeman; Laura Migliaccio; Clifford Qualls; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  The Effect of Perineal Lacerations on Pelvic Floor Function and Anatomy at 6 Months Postpartum in a Prospective Cohort of Nulliparous Women.

Authors:  Lawrence Leeman; Rebecca Rogers; Noelle Borders; Dusty Teaf; Clifford Qualls
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 3.689

3.  Perineal body stretch during labor does not predict perineal laceration, postpartum incontinence, or postpartum sexual function: a cohort study.

Authors:  Kate V Meriwether; Rebecca G Rogers; Gena C Dunivan; Jill K Alldredge; Clifford Qualls; Laura Migliaccio; Lawrence Leeman
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Fecal incontinence: the role of the urologist.

Authors:  C A Unger; H B Goldman; J E Jelovsek
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  The relationship of 3-D translabial ultrasound anal sphincter complex measurements to postpartum anal and fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Kate V Meriwether; Rebecca J Hall; Lawrence M Leeman; Laura Migliaccio; Clifford Qualls; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Pelvic floor symptoms and quality of life changes during first pregnancy: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Rebecca G Rogers; Cara Ninivaggio; Kelly Gallagher; A Noelle Borders; Clifford Qualls; Lawrence M Leeman
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  The immediate effect of vaginal and caesarean delivery on anal sphincter measurements.

Authors:  Deniz Karcaaltincaba; Salim Erkaya; Hatice Isik; Ali Haberal
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 1.671

8.  Reducing pelvic floor injury by induction of labor.

Authors:  Linda S Burkett; Timothy P Canavan; Stephanie M Glass Clark; Lauren E Giugale; Amanda M Artsen; Pamela A Moalli
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 1.932

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.