Literature DB >> 9393709

Genetic requirements and mutational specificity of the Escherichia coli SOS mutator activity.

I J Fijalkowska1, R L Dunn, R M Schaaper.   

Abstract

To better understand the mechanisms of SOS mutagenesis in the bacterium Escherichia coli, we have undertaken a genetic analysis of the SOS mutator activity. The SOS mutator activity results from constitutive expression of the SOS system in strains carrying a constitutively activated RecA protein (RecA730). We show that the SOS mutator activity is not enhanced in strains containing deficiencies in the uvrABC nucleotide excision-repair system or the xth and nfo base excision-repair systems. Further, recA730-induced errors are shown to be corrected by the MutHLS-dependent mismatch-repair system as efficiently as the corresponding errors in the rec+ background. These results suggest that the SOS mutator activity does not reflect mutagenesis at so-called cryptic lesions but instead represents an amplification of normally occurring DNA polymerase errors. Analysis of the base-pair-substitution mutations induced by recA730 in a mismatch repair-deficient background shows that both transition and transversion errors are amplified, although the effect is much larger for transversions than for transitions. Analysis of the mutator effect in various dnaE strains, including dnaE antimutators, as well as in proofreading-deficient dnaQ (mutD) strains suggests that in recA730 strains, two types of replication errors occur in parallel: (i) normal replication errors that are subject to both exonucleolytic proofreading and dnaE antimutator effects and (ii) recA730-specific errors that are not susceptible to either proofreading or dnaE antimutator effects. The combined data are consistent with a model suggesting that in recA730 cells error-prone replication complexes are assembled at sites where DNA polymerization is temporarily stalled, most likely when a normal polymerase insertion error has created a poorly extendable terminal mismatch. The modified complex forces extension of the mismatch largely at the exclusion of proofreading and polymerase dissociation pathways. SOS mutagenesis targeted at replication-blocking DNA lesions likely proceeds in the same manner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9393709      PMCID: PMC179695          DOI: 10.1128/jb.179.23.7435-7445.1997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  74 in total

1.  The Escherichia coli galK2 papillation assay: its specificity and application to seven newly isolated mutator strains.

Authors:  A R Oller; I J Fijalkowska; R M Schaaper
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Base selection, proofreading, and mismatch repair during DNA replication in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  R M Schaaper
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1993-11-15       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Antimutator mutations in the alpha subunit of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III: identification of the responsible mutations and alignment with other DNA polymerases.

Authors:  I J Fijalkowska; R M Schaaper
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The mutational specificity of two Escherichia coli dnaE antimutator alleles as determined from lacI mutation spectra.

Authors:  R M Schaaper
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  SOS mutagenesis.

Authors:  S Murli; G C Walker
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.578

6.  DNA polymerase II of Escherichia coli in the bypass of abasic sites in vivo.

Authors:  I Tessman; M A Kennedy
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Drosophila Rrp1 complements E. coli xth nfo mutants: protection against both oxidative and alkylation-induced DNA damage.

Authors:  L Gu; S M Huang; M Sander
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1993-10-11       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Involvement of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase II in response to oxidative damage and adaptive mutation.

Authors:  M Escarceller; J Hicks; G Gudmundsson; G Trump; D Touati; S Lovett; P L Foster; K McEntee; M F Goodman
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Mutants of Escherichia coli with increased fidelity of DNA replication.

Authors:  I J Fijalkowska; R L Dunn; R M Schaaper
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Effect of single DNA lesions on in vitro replication with DNA polymerase III holoenzyme. Comparison with other polymerases.

Authors:  P Belguise-Valladier; H Maki; M Sekiguchi; R P Fuchs
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1994-02-11       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  62 in total

1.  Intrinsic polymerase activities of UmuD'(2)C and MucA'(2)B are responsible for their different mutagenic properties during bypass of a T-T cis-syn cyclobutane dimer.

Authors:  P I O'Grady; A Borden; D Vandewiele; A Ozgenc; R Woodgate; C W Lawrence
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  The SOS response regulates adaptive mutation.

Authors:  G J McKenzie; R S Harris; P L Lee; S M Rosenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Highly mutagenic replication by DNA polymerase V (UmuC) provides a mechanistic basis for SOS untargeted mutagenesis.

Authors:  A Maor-Shoshani; N B Reuven; G Tomer; Z Livneh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Roles of DNA polymerases V and II in SOS-induced error-prone and error-free repair in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  P Pham; S Rangarajan; R Woodgate; M F Goodman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  DNA replication fidelity in Escherichia coli: a multi-DNA polymerase affair.

Authors:  Iwona J Fijalkowska; Roel M Schaaper; Piotr Jonczyk
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 16.408

6.  Antagonism of ultraviolet-light mutagenesis by the methyl-directed mismatch-repair system of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  H Liu; S R Hewitt; J B Hays
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Lack of strand bias in UV-induced mutagenesis in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Damian Gawel; Magdalena Maliszewska-Tkaczyk; Piotr Jonczyk; Roel M Schaaper; Iwona J Fijalkowska
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Role of DNA polymerase IV in Escherichia coli SOS mutator activity.

Authors:  Wojciech Kuban; Magdalena Banach-Orlowska; Roel M Schaaper; Piotr Jonczyk; Iwona J Fijalkowska
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Roles of YqjH and YqjW, homologs of the Escherichia coli UmuC/DinB or Y superfamily of DNA polymerases, in stationary-phase mutagenesis and UV-induced mutagenesis of Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Huang-Mo Sung; Gabriel Yeamans; Christian A Ross; Ronald E Yasbin
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Novel Escherichia coli umuD' mutants: structure-function insights into SOS mutagenesis.

Authors:  M McLenigan; T S Peat; E G Frank; J P McDonald; M Gonzalez; A S Levine; W A Hendrickson; R Woodgate
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.