Literature DB >> 15164219

Ultrasonic singing by the blue-throated hummingbird: a comparison between production and perception.

Carolyn L Pytte1, Millicent S Ficken, Andrew Moiseff.   

Abstract

Blue-throated hummingbirds produce elaborate songs extending into the ultrasonic frequency range, up to 30 kHz. Ultrasonic song elements include harmonics and extensions of audible notes, non-harmonic components of audible syllables, and sounds produced at frequencies above 20 kHz without corresponding hearing range sound. To determine whether ultrasonic song elements function in intraspecific communication, we tested the hearing range of male and female blue-throated hummingbirds. We measured auditory thresholds for tone pips ranging from 1 kHz to 50 kHz using auditory brainstem responses. Neither male nor female blue-throated hummingbirds appear to be able to hear above 7 kHz. No auditory brainstem responses could be detected between 8 and 50 kHz at 90 dB. This high-frequency cutoff is well within the range reported for other species of birds. These results suggest that high-frequency song elements are not used in intraspecific communication. We propose that the restricted hummingbird hearing range may exemplify a phylogenetic constraint.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15164219     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-004-0525-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  15 in total

1.  High-frequency auditory feedback is not required for adult song maintenance in Bengalese finches.

Authors:  S M Woolley; E W Rubel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Hearing in the FM-bat Phyllostomus discolor: a behavioral audiogram.

Authors:  K H Esser; A Daucher
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 3.  Behavioral and physiological studies of hearing in birds.

Authors:  M B Sachs; J M Sinnott; R D Hienz
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1978-08

4.  Age-related changes in auditory evoked potentials of gerbils. I. Response amplitudes.

Authors:  F A Boettcher; J H Mills; B L Norton
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  The auditory brain stem response in five vertebrate classes.

Authors:  J T Corwin; T H Bullock; J Schweitzer
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-12

6.  Ultrasound detection by clupeiform fishes.

Authors:  D A Mann; D M Higgs; W N Tavolga; M J Souza; A N Popper
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Estimation of the pure-tone audiogram by the auditory brainstem response: a review.

Authors:  D R Stapells; P Oates
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.854

8.  Hearing thresholds in the rabbit. A behavioral and electrophysiological study.

Authors:  E Borg; B Engström
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.494

9.  Auditory sensitivity and song spectrum of the common canary (Serinus canarius).

Authors:  R J Dooling; J A Mulligan; J D Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Development of brainstem auditory pathway in mallard duck embryos and hatchlings.

Authors:  L P Dmitrieva; G Gottlieb
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.836

View more
  9 in total

1.  Thermocron iButton and iBBat temperature dataloggers emit ultrasound.

Authors:  Craig K R Willis; Joel W Jameson; Paul A Faure; Justin G Boyles; Virgil Brack; Tom H Cervone
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Large odorous frogs (Odorrana graminea) produce ultrasonic calls.

Authors:  Jun-Xian Shen; Zhi-Min Xu; Albert S Feng; Peter M Narins
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Tonality over a broad frequency range is linked to vocal learning in birds.

Authors:  Marius Faiß; Tobias Riede; Franz Goller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 5.530

4.  High-frequency hearing in a hummingbird.

Authors:  F G Duque; C A Rodriguez-Saltos; S Uma; I Nasir; M F Monteros; W Wilczynski; L L Carruth
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 14.136

5.  Ultrasonic signalling by a Bornean frog.

Authors:  Victoria S Arch; T Ulmar Grafe; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Auditory performance in bald eagles and red-tailed hawks: a comparative study of hearing in diurnal raptors.

Authors:  JoAnn McGee; Peggy B Nelson; Julia B Ponder; Jeffrey Marr; Patrick Redig; Edward J Walsh
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  The vocal organ of hummingbirds shows convergence with songbirds.

Authors:  Tobias Riede; Christopher R Olson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Pure ultrasonic communication in an endemic Bornean frog.

Authors:  Victoria S Arch; T Ulmar Grafe; Marcos Gridi-Papp; Peter M Narins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  How oscillating aerodynamic forces explain the timbre of the hummingbird's hum and other animals in flapping flight.

Authors:  Ben J Hightower; Patrick Wa Wijnings; Rick Scholte; Rivers Ingersoll; Diana D Chin; Jade Nguyen; Daniel Shorr; David Lentink
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 8.140

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.