Literature DB >> 9384465

Integrated pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of Ro 48-6791, a new benzodiazepine, in comparison with midazolam during first administration to healthy male subjects.

J Dingemanse1, J M van Gerven, R C Schoemaker, G Roncari, J J Oberyé, M F van Oostenbruggen, J Massarella, P Segala, M Zell, A F Cohen.   

Abstract

AIMS: This study was performed to investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ascending doses of Ro 48-6791, compared with midazolam, in healthy subjects during first administration to man studies.
METHODS: The study was double-blind and five-way crossover with treatment on 5 consecutive days (three ascending doses, placebo, fixed midazolam dose) in two sequential groups of five healthy male subjects. Ro 48-6791 was administered as a slow i.v. infusion in doses of 0.1-0.3-1 mg in the first group, and 1-2-3 mg in the second. Midazolam was infused at 0.1 mg kg(-1). The infusions were stopped after 20 min or if sedation became too strong for proper performance of the tests. Consequently, infusion rates (mg min(-1)) differed considerably among doses. Blood samples were collected frequently for pharmacokinetic determinations (two-compartment model). Pharmacodynamics were assessed by recording of saccadic eye movements (saccadic peak velocity) and electroencephalography (beta-power). These parameters were used for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling.
RESULTS: Ro 48-6791 and midazolam were both well tolerated. Most clinical events were dose-dependent central depressant effects. The volume of distribution (V(SS)) and plasma clearance of Ro 48-6791 were on average markedly larger than those of midazolam (171 +/- 65 vs 41 +/- 10 l and 2.2 +/- 0.9 vs 0.42 +/- 0.11 l min(-1), respectively). The doses of Ro 48-6791 leading to loss of saccadic eye movements were on average four times lower than that of midazolam. The corresponding predicted effect compartment concentrations differed by a factor of about six. Doses of Ro 48-6791 and midazolam eliciting similar maximum effects had a comparable onset and duration of action for saccadic peak velocity. Midazolam caused a significantly larger (33%, range 17, 55%) increase in beta-power than Ro 48-6791 at the highest administered dose. Ro 48-6792, a metabolite of Ro 48-6791, showed a considerably longer half-life than the parent compound. Although there were no indications of a discernable effect of Ro 48-6792 in the present study, the effects of possible accumulation during prolonged administration should be investigated further.
CONCLUSIONS: This first study with Ro 48-6791 in humans has shown that this benzodiazepine is approximately four to six times as potent as midazolam, but has a comparable onset and duration of action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9384465      PMCID: PMC2042878          DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1997.t01-1-00612.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  8 in total

1.  Estimating potency for the Emax-model without attaining maximal effects.

Authors:  R C Schoemaker; J M van Gerven; A F Cohen
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1998-10

2.  Scaling of pharmacokinetics across paediatric populations: the lack of interpolative power of allometric models.

Authors:  Massimo Cella; Catherijne Knibbe; Saskia N de Wildt; Joop Van Gerven; Meindert Danhof; Oscar Della Pasqua
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Should we tolerate tolerability as an objective in early drug development?

Authors:  A Cohen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Integrated pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in drug development.

Authors:  Jasper Dingemanse; Silke Appel-Dingemanse
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data to be derived from early-phase drug development: designing informative human pharmacology studies.

Authors:  Adam Cohen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a new highly concentrated intranasal midazolam formulation for conscious sedation.

Authors:  Lenneke Schrier; Rob Zuiker; Frans W H M Merkus; Erica S Klaassen; Zheng Guan; Bert Tuk; Joop M A van Gerven; Ronald van der Geest; Geert Jan Groeneveld
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Prediction of the clearance of eleven drugs and associated variability in neonates, infants and children.

Authors:  Trevor N Johnson; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan; Geoffrey T Tucker
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of central nervous system effects of scopolamine in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Marieke Liem-Moolenaar; Peter de Boer; Maarten Timmers; Rik C Schoemaker; J G Coen van Hasselt; Stephan Schmidt; Joop M A van Gerven
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.335

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.