Literature DB >> 22300419

Scaling of pharmacokinetics across paediatric populations: the lack of interpolative power of allometric models.

Massimo Cella1, Catherijne Knibbe, Saskia N de Wildt, Joop Van Gerven, Meindert Danhof, Oscar Della Pasqua.   

Abstract

AIM: The objective of this investigation was to assess the performance of an allometric model as the basis for interpolating drug exposure in the context of pharmacokinetic bridging across paediatric subpopulations.
METHODS: Midazolam was selected as a paradigm compound. Two nonlinear mixed effects models were developed to describe midazolam pharmacokinetics in infants, toddlers and adults (model 1) and in children and adolescents (model 2). Subsequently, systemic drug exposure, expressed in terms of the area under the concentration vs. time curve (AUC), in children and adolescents was interpolated based on pharmacokinetic parameter distributions obtained from the model describing infants, toddlers and adults (model 1). Results were compared with the values obtained from modelling of the data in the corresponding population (model 2).
RESULTS: The two pharmacokinetic models accurately described midazolam exposure in the population on which they were built. However, the model based on data from infants, toddlers and adults failed to predict the exposure observed in children and adolescents: the mean difference between the predicted and estimated AUC(0-180) was of -17.8%, with a range of -6.8 to -38.4%.The discrepancy between estimated and interpolated exposure increased proportionally with body weight.
CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicate that irrespective of whether extrapolation or interpolation methods are to be applied during paediatric drug development, model predictions beyond the range of the data used for parameter estimation may be biased. For accurate inter- or extrapolation to different populations, the assumption of identical parameter-covariate correlations across age groups may not be taken for granted.
© 2012 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology © 2012 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22300419      PMCID: PMC3477354          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04206.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  46 in total

Review 1.  Knowledge-driven approaches for the guidance of first-in-children dosing.

Authors:  Andrea N Edginton
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 2.556

2.  Comparison of Bayesian model averaging and stepwise methods for model selection in logistic regression.

Authors:  Duolao Wang; Wenyang Zhang; Ameet Bakhai
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-11-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Use of prior information to stabilize a population data analysis.

Authors:  Per O Gisleskog; Mats O Karlsson; Stuart L Beal
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.745

4.  A size standard for pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  N H Holford
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Integrated pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of Ro 48-8684, a new benzodiazepine, in comparison with midazolam during first administration to healthy male subjects.

Authors:  J M van Gerven; G Roncari; R C Schoemaker; J Massarella; P Keesmaat; H Kooyman; P Heizmann; M Zell; A F Cohen; J Dingemanse
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Systematic evaluation of the descriptive and predictive performance of paediatric morphine population models.

Authors:  Elke H J Krekels; Johan G C van Hasselt; Dick Tibboel; Meindert Danhof; Catherijne A J Knibbe
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  Population pharmacokinetics and metabolism of midazolam in pediatric intensive care patients.

Authors:  S N de Wildt; M de Hoog; A A Vinks; E van der Giesen; J N van den Anker
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 8.  Essentials for starting a pediatric clinical study (1): Pharmacokinetics in children.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Yokoi
Journal:  J Toxicol Sci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.196

9.  Population pharmacokinetics of midazolam administered by target controlled infusion for sedation following coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  K Zomorodi; A Donner; J Somma; J Barr; R Sladen; J Ramsay; E Geller; S L Shafer
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Population pharmacokinetic modeling in very premature infants receiving midazolam during mechanical ventilation: midazolam neonatal pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  T C Lee; B G Charles; G J Harte; P H Gray; P A Steer; V J Flenady
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Applications of mechanistic modelling to clinical and experimental immunology: an emerging technology to accelerate immunotherapeutic discovery and development.

Authors:  L V Brown; E A Gaffney; J Wagg; M C Coles
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Influence of covariate distribution on the predictive performance of pharmacokinetic models in paediatric research.

Authors:  Chiara Piana; Meindert Danhof; Oscar Della Pasqua
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Changes in individual drug-independent system parameters during virtual paediatric pharmacokinetic trials: introducing time-varying physiology into a paediatric PBPK model.

Authors:  Khaled Abduljalil; Masoud Jamei; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan; Trevor N Johnson
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Effect of Age-Related Factors on the Pharmacokinetics of Lamotrigine and Potential Implications for Maintenance Dose Optimisation in Future Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Sven C van Dijkman; Nico C B de Jager; Willem M Rauwé; Meindert Danhof; Oscar Della Pasqua
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  Dosing in children: a critical review of the pharmacokinetic allometric scaling and modelling approaches in paediatric drug development and clinical settings.

Authors:  Iftekhar Mahmood
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  The impact of composite AUC estimates on the prediction of systemic exposure in toxicology experiments.

Authors:  Tarjinder Sahota; Meindert Danhof; Oscar Della Pasqua
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling in Pediatric Drug Development, and the Importance of Standardized Scaling of Clearance.

Authors:  Eva Germovsek; Charlotte I S Barker; Mike Sharland; Joseph F Standing
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 5.577

8.  Improving clinical paediatric research and learning from COVID-19: recommendations by the Conect4Children expert advice group.

Authors:  Athimalaipet V Ramanan; Neena Modi; Saskia N de Wildt
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.953

Review 9.  Prior information for population pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis: overview and guidance with a focus on the NONMEM PRIOR subroutine.

Authors:  Anna H-X P Chan Kwong; Elisa A M Calvier; David Fabre; Florence Gattacceca; Sonia Khier
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 2.745

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.